yeah I cannot believe Steadmans was wrong..nm
Posted By: in this case I think Steadman's is wrong... on 2006-01-24
In Reply to: Must be why I could find sm - Txczech
Subject: yeah I cannot believe Steadmans was wrong..nm
x
Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old. To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
actually in Steadmans radiology and oncology
Subject: actually in Steadmans radiology and oncology
it is listed as mass effect. affect/effect is the most irritating thing about this job I'm sure. No matter how many times I'm told I can NEVER get it right!!!!
Steadmans has bivalved cast...any chance of that?
Subject: Steadmans has bivalved cast...any chance of that?
You are correct, doc either gave wrong dosage or wrong drug, would "flag" this for your QA dep
Subject: You are correct, doc either gave wrong dosage or wrong drug, would "flag" this for your QA dept if you have one.
Was this in wrong spot before? We had a slew of responses, all wrong! nm
Subject: Was this in wrong spot before? We had a slew of responses, all wrong! nm
s
Yeah, there are. But
Subject: Yeah, there are. But
"Are you kidding? Does not deserve an answer." sounds more like specific question related rather than too many posts related.
yeah, could have been PET
Subject: yeah, could have been PET
sure did s/l pan though! I didn't think pan CT made any sense and couldn't find a reference, but I wanted to be sure.
Thanks so much, I really appreciate the help!
OHH yeah that does help. She did say
Subject: OHH yeah that does help. She did say
pt is scheduled for a "colectomy takedown and reanastomosis" I guess I'll leave it as she says it. I thought maybe she could have been using the wrong term and meant "colostomy takedown" or it could have been "colectomy, takedown, and reanastomosis" like the pt was going to have another colectomy.
Thanks so much for the help! And just in time, too, I'm just about to send in the report. Much appreciated!
well yeah, sure....if it is an ESL....*LOL*
Subject: well yeah, sure....if it is an ESL....*LOL*
too funny!!! You're correct!!!!
Of course, I was just taking *a guess* - because I don't know a *y* - and I just based my response on the 2a the OP typed.....but thanks for adding to the helping fun part of all this
And oh yeah...
Subject: And oh yeah...
Does anyone know where a good psych eval template is??? Preferably one with samples. TY again.
yeah, yeah, that's it!
Subject: yeah, yeah, that's it!
THANKS! :)
Ha, yeah I know about the
Subject: Ha, yeah I know about the
no "v". I have several ESLs!
yeah, maybe...
Subject: yeah, maybe...
Maybe that does look better.
I wish we could find this documented in some reference book!
Uh, yeah, that should be
Subject: Uh, yeah, that should be
malformation. Both times. Yikes! lol I think I need to go to bed.
LOL, yeah maybe!
Subject: LOL, yeah maybe!
nm
yeah..
Subject: yeah..
That is what I knew to do, I am just second guessing everything tonight! Thanks!
yeah!!!
Subject: yeah!!!
Thanks guys. Yes the patient had kydney stones.
YEAH!
Subject: YEAH!
I love it when you look and look and then find it.
Yeah....FDL
Subject: Yeah....FDL
got it earlier while searching for correct word.....thnx for your time....
Yeah...
Subject: Yeah...
Yeah. I know. 21 of the 25 doctors I routinely transcribe are ESL. It's challenging, to say the least. I was just hoping that someone would recognize the sounds. (I know that sometimes I can, even when reading what someone else heard.)
I blanked it. Will report back if anyone cares.
yeah
Subject: yeah
yeah it is technetium sorry rushing while writting the post. Thanks
Yeah! Thank you!
Subject: Yeah! Thank you!
I was getting so frustrated by that one. Thanks for helping me!
Yeah thats it! Thank you!
Subject: Yeah thats it! Thank you!
Oh yeah...
Subject: Oh yeah...
I know how that is. It's weird that some docs expect you to go against common rules. The BOS says use of actual numbers should be used exclusively but at times to use your own judgement. But, even common English rules say not to spell out numbers above 10. Now, capitalizing generic medicines is just plain crazy. But you do what they ask, no matter how ignorant. :-) Been there, done that.
oh, yeah that's it.!? Thanks nm
Subject: oh, yeah that's it.!? Thanks nm
x
Yeah, I know how that is. I don't use printed
Subject: Yeah, I know how that is. I don't use printed
references anymore. They are just not current.
Yeah, I know, I just hate...
Subject: Yeah, I know, I just hate...
to leave a blank. I just picked up for someone on vacation and I hate to have a blank on the first dictation ...ah well. Thanks anyhow!
Yeah, I just found that also...
Subject: Yeah, I just found that also...
Not sure if it is correct or not though...oh well. Thanks for you help.
Yeah, laparoscopy
Subject: Yeah, laparoscopy
That's what I'd go with.
yeah LOL but we need to cut her some slack..
Subject: yeah LOL but we need to cut her some slack..
Oh yeah....I hear you
Subject: Oh yeah....I hear you
I call those my "brain no workee" days.
yeah! Glad I could help! nm
Subject: yeah! Glad I could help! nm
xx
Yeah, now tell that to my family :)
Subject: Yeah, now tell that to my family :)
Yeah, that could be a good s/l
Subject: Yeah, that could be a good s/l
too. Hey, desperado and catzgonewild havin' a great ole time on a Friday night... Don't know why, this just struck me funny!
Yeah I was hoping... :-)
Subject: Yeah I was hoping... :-)
Yeah, I don't see how it's an abdl CT
Subject: Yeah, I don't see how it's an abdl CT
and it's showing the sacrum, so I wonder if it's really a CT of the pelvis. Docs can be really sloppy about dictating the names of procedures, which can make it harder on billing.
uh yeah, I guess you would be.
Subject: uh yeah, I guess you would be.
I just googled it.
Yeah -Fubar was in the 80s/90s
Subject: Yeah -Fubar was in the 80s/90s
Yeah, sorry. He says it clearly twice, but can't document. Thx.
Subject: Yeah, sorry. He says it clearly twice, but can't document. Thx.
yeah, saw that, might use that and flag it -- thanks so much
Subject: yeah, saw that, might use that and flag it -- thanks so much
x
yeah, skin. nm
Subject: yeah, skin. nm
xx
Yeah!!! It is amphiphysin. Thanks for your help.
Subject: Yeah!!! It is amphiphysin. Thanks for your help.
Got it - parabola - yeah !!
Subject: Got it - parabola - yeah !!
yeah, I'm with you - this is confusing...
Subject: yeah, I'm with you - this is confusing...
I can't put the haptic as being "captured" and in the "sulcus," just that the optic is "captured" and the "haptic" in the sulcus...I think my brain hurts now.
oh yeah right. NewbieMT was the instigator
Subject: oh yeah right. NewbieMT was the instigator
go find some work to do today
lol
Yeah, but I believe the OP did mention that research had been done...sm
Subject: Yeah, but I believe the OP did mention that research had been done...sm
The OP had used Google and found instances of both words being used. Sounds more like the OP was looking for some help with the proper usage of the word in the context of a report. I don't see why she (or he) caught any grief for asking for opinions on the proper term to use.
YEAH! Thank you! I feel so DUMB!
Subject: YEAH! Thank you! I feel so DUMB!
nm
yeah - I've noticed!
Subject: yeah - I've noticed!
I've already found myself either sticking up for others, or myself, during my few days on this board - some people can really be out of line. I am looking forward to helping though - especially the new MTs - if they do well and look good, we (American MTs) in turn look good as a group. I would like to dedicate some of my time each day to just browse by and see if any help is needed out there - believe me - I have plenty of time with all the standby during the final days at Heartland :) Anyhow, Thank you for helping me focus my efforts in the right direction!
yeah...like hyperflexibility. It is not a word either--sm
Subject: yeah...like hyperflexibility. It is not a word either--sm
but used a lot. I hear subluxation, and subluxing all the time, but I have never heard any of my ortho docs say subluxability, but I suppose it could be accepted.
yeah, but based on the sentence I don't think
Subject: yeah, but based on the sentence I don't think
the doc is referring to a particular drug, just a class of drug.
Yeah, I found that when I googled it, but
Subject: Yeah, I found that when I googled it, but
I'm sure that is not it. I found something else that relates to nuclear medicine, but nothing that states what UPPI stands for. Thanks for the help, though!
Oh yeah I guess you're right
Subject: Oh yeah I guess you're right
didn't think of that! I guess he is saying Viagra though.
|