waste some more bandwidth why don't you

Posted By: get over yourself on 2007-05-17
In Reply to: wow, the other poster simply asked for a resource - who is the nasty one? n/m

Subject: waste some more bandwidth why don't you

x

Complete Discussion Below:

marks the location of current message within thread

how do you transcribe q 6 h for a prescription? - k
- actually, it is q.4h. (with the 2 periods) - - no message
  - acutally it's q.6 h. (space between 6 and h) - n/m
    - it is q.4h. with no space - why not back up what you say with a resource?
      - I'm the poster and I'll back it up...SM - n/m
        wow, the other poster simply asked for a resource - who is the nasty one? n/m
        post was nasty, challenging and saying..nm - the poster was wrong & to back it up w/a resource
        waste some more bandwidth why don't you - get over yourself
      - WRONG! It is q.6 h. WITH A SPACE. - lot to learn
        thanks for confirming/backing some of us up!! *S* - n/m
        thanks Lilly - I found the same info *S*.. - n/m
      - Drug terminology - Lilly
        oops, should've posted that here - thanks Lilly!! *S* - n/m
        Dosing - Lilly
  - I mean q.6h. (per AAMT) - under Drug Terminology- no message
    - used to be no space; Second Addition AAMT changed to a space - -explained without just saying its WRONG - NM
      - You know what they can do with their 2nd edition (and their 135th if they get that far?) - Anon
        WOW-really don't need MTs like U w/that attitude! - n/m
        It's not that I have a bad attitude, really, it's just (sm) - Please don't shoot me
        hehe....or, why not just say -- - every 6 hours- no message
    - WRONG. It is q.6 h. WITH A SPACE - lot to learn
    - okay...thanks a lot! - k
      - you're welcome; you can make a macro for it - no message
- q.6h - nm
- q.6 h. - mt
  - thank you very much. - k

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Other related messages found in our database

wasting bandwidth......NM
Subject: wasting bandwidth......NM

z

If unsure blank it and don't waste your
Subject: If unsure blank it and don't waste your

x

Oooh, so sorry to waste your precious time, but
Subject: Oooh, so sorry to waste your precious time, but

the object of my post was to get the OP to hint that she should first read up on the drug before assuming anything. So then somebody came along and announced what the drug actually was. I'm thinking, is this the OP saying it was an antifungal, and that's practically the same thing. I've heard this argument before, but since there are so many antibiotics, I would not suggest anybody categorize antifungals in with antibiotics if they expect to logic out a drug name. Or was it somebody who just had to give away what the drug was, which means she might not need to research because, tada, this is what it is?? So to me the wasted post was somebody saying, "oh, it's an antifungal!" That's all I'm saying.

wasted bandwidth - poster only capped LAP-BAND
Subject: wasted bandwidth - poster only capped LAP-BAND

@@