she's posting confidential info that her employer would

• Hey Newbie MT - Milton's Red Stapler
  • Re: NewbiwMT - Janie
  • SM - anon
    • If I don't mind helping her, then you shouldn't either. sm - CL
      • If I wanted to help, I would. SM - anon
        • I meant, "then you shouldn't mind my helping her, either." Geeze! nm - CL
      • You are not developing her research skills - Milton's Red Stapler
        • SHE'S BEEN AN MT FOR ONLY 6 MONTHS!! SM - CL
          • Sten-Tel obviously has low standards! She insults real MTs when she calls herself one. - typingplayer
          • Moron. If her employer found out she was doing that she'd - be fired in a second and should.
            • Name calling is not allowed on MT Stars. Where's our moderator now? Where RU??? Yoo-hoo! (N - NM
          • Okay, here is my real response - Milton's Red Stapler
          • Who me, win? - Milton's Red Stapler
            • Very funny CL!! - NewbieMT
              • That was so clever - NOT! - Milton's Red Stapler
                • Very creepy!!! - GI MT
          • she's posting confidential info that her employer would - croak if they saw it
      • Thanks for the response. - NewbieMT
        • Helping hand is one thing... - sirpercy
        • Newbie posting reports - Janie
        • Do not post reports for QA purposes on this board. (SM) - Goldbird (Moderator)
        • To Newbie (sm) - txmt
          • Appreciate your response sm - NewbieMT
            • what no appreciation to the moderator - Milton's Red Stapler
              • W-H-A-T??? - txmt
          • NewbieMT has only had 6 months on the job! Thanks!!!! nm - CL
        • Like I said below, I remember how terrifying this is sm - CL
    • Reports - NewbieMT
      • Newbie's reports - QAQueen
  • Milton Red Stapler - NewbieMT
    • Milton's advice - BookerT
      • What's a smary-pants? - and the MGs
    • I*'m just wondering why all this - Milton's Red Stapler
      • clarifications - George Catuogno
        • Re: clarifications - NC MT
          • No I didn't mind - Milton's Red Stapler
            • Cool. - NC MT
      • Yesterday in this very same post you spelled sm - Amused and Watching
        • umm, methinks you need glasses now - Milton's Red Stapler
          • LOL! Perhaps I printed yesterday's thread. - A&W
            • Please return to your regularly scheduled - Milton's Red Stapler
      • Newbie works for Sten-Tel - see msg
        • Well that explains a lot - Milton's Red Stapler
        • Hope they are not paying her more than 2 cents a line, which is about what her skill level is worth! - oldMT
          • She even bashes them - sm
      • You may not be a newbie, but you "pubically stated"??? - txmt

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Apparently BOS states both ways.  Ex.  X-rays, 2 views, blah, blah, blah.. or X-rays, two views, blah, blah, blah....  Same would apply with 1st and first.  I've had experiences where the client dictates which way they'd like it, and both are correct depending on which BOS you go by.  Hope this helps. 

I go like so

Axis   I

          xxxxx

          xxxxx

          xxxxx

Axis   II

Axis  III

Axis   IV

Axis   V

I got this straight from the horse's mouth so to speak. Actually from the Peds Urologist whose work I do. He lives in Arizona.

A bladder augmentation with the small bowel ileum (ileocystoplasty) and the creation of a continent catheterizable channel using the small bowel and reconfiguring that into a short tube or channel that is implanted into the bladder.  That allows the patient to catheterize from the abdomen (often the belly button) rather than having to cath through the urethra since after the augmentation they usually can not void enough to empty the enlarged bladder.  It was described by a physician named Montie (I think at the Univ of Miami) and is now often called a Montie catheterizable channel.  Both are an attempt to make a small bladder (eg neurogenic bladder) bigger to hold more urine and avoid urinary incontinence.  Essentially trading an enlarged bladder with the need for catheterization to maintain continence for too small a bladder and incontinence.

It's a minor annoyance....but when you go to the verification page, do you have to click in the box to put in the letter/number combination?

On the other boards, the cursor is already there. I can't tell you how many times I have glanced at the code, entered it without looking at the screen, then hit "enter", only to get an error message and have to enter a new code. I finally started paying attention and as far as I can tell, this is the only board that does that.

As I said, minor but annoying.....wanted to see if anyone else has experienced that.

This can be very crippling disease.  I have a friend who is only 33 and cannot even scratch her own nose.  She cannot turn over in bed or do anything for herself.  It is a progressive illness.  When she was little, she could walk and do everything a normal child could and by the time she was a teenager she was in a wheelchair.  Now she is completely disabled.

.