s/l "fashus" (long a sound) versus ischemic etiology
Posted By: Tracy on 2009-01-22
In Reply to:
Subject: s/l "fashus" (long a sound) versus ischemic etiology
Can anyone help with this? It sounds like "fashus"
Cecal inflammatory change, consideration of ________ versus ischemic etiology, potential for neoplastic infiltration of the cecum should be considered
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
long shot, but ischemic ulcer? see message
Subject: long shot, but ischemic ulcer? see message
A recent hypothesis proposed that in venous ulceration, trapped leucocytes occlude capillaries, thereby resulting in cutaneous ischaemia.30
kind of lost on this one. I would still opt for venous ulcer though, too.
Hi - thanks for trying. I should have clarified the s/l is long "i" sound - as in my.
Subject: Hi - thanks for trying. I should have clarified the s/l is long "i" sound - as in my.
nm
No, it's definitely "modic" or "motic", with a long o sound.
Subject: No, it's definitely "modic" or "motic", with a long o sound.
I suspect it's maybe a radiology term. I'm buying a radiology word book, but, wouldn't you know it, it won't be here for another week or so.
do you have a dose? long i sound? more info helps. nm
Subject: do you have a dose? long i sound? more info helps. nm
x
It's when it has a short vowel sound rather than a long vowel sound.
Subject: It's when it has a short vowel sound rather than a long vowel sound.
x
ESL possibly saying "lab exams" with a long 'e' sound (s/ EEksams)? nm
Subject: ESL possibly saying "lab exams" with a long 'e' sound (s/ EEksams)? nm
S/L? SG ETIOLOGY?
Subject: S/L? SG ETIOLOGY?
At the end of this H&P doc says a heading S/L "ST ETIOLOGY" or "SG ETIOLOGY" or "HISTORY ETIOLOGY" Any ideas? It is the last section of the report after IMPRESSION and includes his recommendations. The patient is complaining of gaseous indigestion.
S/L? ETIOLOGY?
Subject: S/L? ETIOLOGY?
Thanks, I'll listen again. ETIOLOGY is part of a heading. S/L "ST ETIOLOGY"
etiology?...nm
Subject: etiology?...nm
xx
Just a guess, etiology? nm
Subject: Just a guess, etiology? nm
!
etiology? morphology?
Subject: etiology? morphology?
x
Pig etiology ?? Please see message
Subject: Pig etiology ?? Please see message
Has coronary artery disease with single bypass. Has pacemaker. Patient has a prosthetic aortic valve, s/l pig etiology.
Thanks for replying. Would they say pig etiology?
Subject: Thanks for replying. Would they say pig etiology?
brain etiology? WAG here. nm
Subject: brain etiology? WAG here. nm
Not a typical heading, but how about "question etiology." nm
Subject: Not a typical heading, but how about "question etiology." nm
x
Etiology of his end stage renal disease
Subject: Etiology of his end stage renal disease
Etiology of his end stage renal disease, vasculopathy, is not entirely clear from the charting of s/l "al boo".
? ischemic toe ulcer. (nm)
Subject: ? ischemic toe ulcer. (nm)
x
Ischemic colon?
Subject: Ischemic colon?
Etiology of hematemesis is due to peptic ulcer disease or ***.
Subject: Etiology of hematemesis is due to peptic ulcer disease or ***.
He's mumbling it and I can only hear *losum* at the end. I think it's some sort of bacteria. TIA!!!!!!
TIA - transient ischemic attack....
Subject: TIA - transient ischemic attack....
x
probably cold ischemic time
Subject: probably cold ischemic time
etc.
Ischemic white matter changes? nm
Subject: Ischemic white matter changes? nm
.
Transient ischemic dilatation (TID)
Subject: Transient ischemic dilatation (TID)
reversible ischemic neurological deficit. See ref.
Subject: reversible ischemic neurological deficit. See ref.
Patients with reversible ischemic neurological deficit (RIND) have ...
Fifteen patients with amaurosis fugax (AF), 37 with hemispheric TIA and 35 with reversible ischemic ...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve& db=PubMed&list_uids=3290358&dopt=Abstract - Similar pages |
MRI of the brain with any obvious ischemic event, but did have a s/l..
Subject: MRI of the brain with any obvious ischemic event, but did have a s/l..
call-lar-e one malformation.. Thank you
TIA=transient ischemic attack or thanks in advance?
Subject: TIA=transient ischemic attack or thanks in advance?
Maybe RIND - reversible ischemic neurologic deficit (nm)
Subject: Maybe RIND - reversible ischemic neurologic deficit (nm)
x
Probably RIND - reversible ischemic neurologic defect.
Subject: Probably RIND - reversible ischemic neurologic defect.
x
atrophy and advanced small vessel ischemic change?
Subject: atrophy and advanced small vessel ischemic change?
awwww thanks Jai - was long long ago *hugs*....nm
Subject: awwww thanks Jai - was long long ago *hugs*....nm
on colonoscopy fragments with superficial ischemic type injury with fibro s/l vinocrotical base
Subject: on colonoscopy fragments with superficial ischemic type injury with fibro s/l vinocrotical base
Thanks if you can help!!!!
Patient with diarrhea. Labs: s/l ESR 3 but sound is a bit distorted. Does that sound low for ESR?
Subject: Patient with diarrhea. Labs: s/l ESR 3 but sound is a bit distorted. Does that sound low for ESR?
no, I definitely hear a p sound at the start and an f sound at the end
Subject: no, I definitely hear a p sound at the start and an f sound at the end
nm
longstanding, long-standing, or long standing?
x
I am a dork! Definitely a "V" sound not "B" sound. nm
Subject: I am a dork! Definitely a "V" sound not "B" sound. nm
No, she said there was a for sure "K" sound. Hespan does not have a "K" sound. nm
Subject: No, she said there was a for sure "K" sound. Hespan does not have a "K" sound. nm
.
lay versus lie
Subject: lay versus lie
Use "lied down" for self, but "layed down" when putting something down. "Lied" takes no object in the sentence, but "layed" takes an object, like "layed a book down". Got this from an English grammar discussion group.
lay versus lie
Subject: lay versus lie
Use "lied down" for self, but "layed down" when putting something down. "Lied" takes no object in the sentence, but "layed" takes an object, like "layed a book down". Got this from an English grammar discussion group.
4 versus four?
Subject: 4 versus four?
x
cc versus mL
Subject: cc versus mL
Have worked on 3 accounts that want it changed. Only one account wanted it to be typed cc as dictated. Think it is per account specific requirements. Most want mL.
was versus were
Subject: was versus were
I believe "was" is correct in this case, as it also would be for medication dosages, i.e., 10 mg was given.
was versus were
Subject: was versus were
Can someone please clarify the correct word - Approximately 10 cc of fluid were/was aspirated. Thanks!
was versus were
Subject: was versus were
Thanks!
un versus non
Subject: un versus non
As QA staff, I would not correct that. It's okay either way...unlikely the client would notice/care about something so minute as that. QA sometimes gets narrowed thinking, so much detail work. Have to see/QA outside the box. 
2x versus x2?
Subject: 2x versus x2?
Not sure of the BOS stance on this, but QA has told me that x2 is acceptable but 2x is not. I would think they would basically be the same, but had my hand slapped for typing 2x.
use of MD versus Dr.
Subject: use of MD versus Dr.
How would you correctly type this sentence?
Dr. John Smith / John Smith, MD performed an appendectomy following the first procedure.
EMG versus ENG
Subject: EMG versus ENG
Pt with leg paresthesias. Doctor is ordering either EMG or ENG and s/l CS. Which would it be, and what would the CS stand for? TIA
CT versus CAT
I remember seeing something in the BOS regarding a preference to use CT versus CAT even if CAT is dictated. Does any one know which BOS and on what page or where this information is coming from? Thank you.
IM versus I.M. versus i.m.
Subject: IM versus I.M. versus i.m.
I've always used IM but Stedmans has it as I.M. or i.m.
What's the right way?
g versus gm
Subject: g versus gm
g versus gm are both correct, but agree with other post that accounts may prevail. I type for an account who wants it as simply g
whom versus who
Subject: whom versus who
Recast the sentence to determine the correct usage.
This is a patient whom I have been seeing. I have been seeing him (so you would use whom).
This is a patient who came to see me. He came to see me (so you would use who).
|
