re-x-ray is correct, but I usually change it to x-ray again. I think it looks and sounds better.
Posted By: MissouriMT on 2006-11-11
In Reply to: re-x-ray? - Jai
Subject: re-x-ray is correct, but I usually change it to x-ray again. I think it looks and sounds better.
x
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
- re-x-ray? - Jai
- re-x-ray is correct, but I usually change it to x-ray again. I think it looks and sounds better. - MissouriMT
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
aliquot is the correct term - I'd change it. nm
Subject: aliquot is the correct term - I'd change it. nm
x
That's correct. Meaning being tibiofemoral area maintained with no change, i.e.
Subject: That's correct. Meaning being tibiofemoral area maintained with no change, i.e.
definition of stasis "indicating the maintenance of (or maintaining) a constant level, preventing increase or multiplication."
moderate change? I'd drop the "got" and go with has. (not gramatically correct)nm
Subject: moderate change? I'd drop the "got" and go with has. (not gramatically correct)nm
That sounds correct. thanks.
Subject: That sounds correct. thanks.
Sounds correct to me
Subject: Sounds correct to me
From Dorlands: Sinus: An abnormal channel or fistula permitting the escape of pus.
I'd say sounds like is correct
Subject: I'd say sounds like is correct
sounds is correct
Subject: sounds is correct
That sounds correct
Subject: That sounds correct
Breaking the word down into it's parts colpo=vagina; procto=anus; gram=study
that sounds correct to me
Subject: that sounds correct to me
Veress sounds correct! nm
Subject: Veress sounds correct! nm
x
proper sounds correct. sm
Subject: proper sounds correct. sm
Think in this case proper means:
4 : strictly limited to a specified thing *the city proper*
friable sounds correct here. nm
Subject: friable sounds correct here. nm
x
sounds correct . . see inside
Subject: sounds correct . . see inside
According to this web site - SWAT is a Swallowing Action Team for dysphagia
http://lshss.asha.org/cgi/content/abstract/31/1/62
never heard of it til this, always good to learn something
Caduet sounds correct
Subject: Caduet sounds correct
according the the dosage that exactly could be the drug he is referring to. Thanks
Sounds is correct--it is an instrument.
Subject: Sounds is correct--it is an instrument.
x
That sounds correct, tho' strangely worded
NM
bandpass sounds right; MT50 is correct.
Subject: bandpass sounds right; MT50 is correct.
I read your other post on this.
What he is dictating is the range of frequencies that they're testing within the entire bandwidth, and the intervals.
Sort of like, your car can go from 0-120 mph (bandwidth). We're looking at the gas mileage between 40-60 mph (bandpass), at 5 mph intervals.
Probably a bad analogy, but hopefully it helps. LOL
yes sounds correct. i would myocardial ischemia
Subject: yes sounds correct. i would myocardial ischemia
then the other test (EGD) was neg for erosive ischemia
correct spelling of what sounds like "Duradex" i believe this is an antibiotic
Subject: correct spelling of what sounds like "Duradex" i believe this is an antibiotic
thanks tons.
yes, is correct, plural form sounds like long I
Subject: yes, is correct, plural form sounds like long I
nm
sounds like "airline" lung disease? Is this correct?
Subject: sounds like "airline" lung disease? Is this correct?
word help sounds like or but that doesn't sound correct
Subject: word help sounds like or but that doesn't sound correct
X-rays taken today indicate the prosthesis to be in good alignment. There is no evidence of loosening s/l or___ radiolucency. There is some calcification noted at the femur and the acetabulum, but the joint space is well maintained.
spasticity is correct. She isn't saying skin turgor. Still sounds like turgurous, but that isn
Subject: spasticity is correct. She isn't saying skin turgor. Still sounds like turgurous, but that isn't a word.
s/l Bez or all in change
Subject: s/l Bez or all in change
shows the patient in sinus mechanism 66 beats per minute, normal intervals, normal axis. Voltage criteria for LVH and s/l Bezoiorall is change in comparison to prior EKG dated
Thanks so much to both of you. I will change to 6, 90, and -1. nm
Subject: Thanks so much to both of you. I will change to 6, 90, and -1. nm
I change that to:
Subject: I change that to:
I change elicitable (which to my knowledge has never been a "real word" to "able to be elicited." My doctor dictator thanked me for this once (I was suprised that he noticed). I checked this out with several transcripitionists that I have worked with who have lots of experience and are CMTs and they also edit this word to "able to be elicited."
I'm not CMT and I change that the same way...nm
Subject: I'm not CMT and I change that the same way...nm
 
cc to mL - do you change cc to mL
Subject: cc to mL - do you change cc to mL
according to AAMT or do you type cc
Thanks
Would you change this...
Would you change CT head to say head CT? The doctor says CT head.
Thanx
VR change
Subject: VR change
He should point it out to his supervisor because it is wrong. I don't care what QA says unless they can show me a resource where they got their information and it checks out. I would also point out to the client this fact. If they don't want to have their transcription correct and concise then I don't want their work. Right is right, wrong is wrong. I am really strong on this especially since the "new AAMT" has made all their "changes" and believe their BOS is the bible. It is not. Many of their "rules" are correct. Many of the are not. Research some of their changes and you will see just how over the top they have gone (it seems to be a control issue and they WILL cram it down your throat). I say that we all research on our own and go to reliable trusted sources that have been proven over time to be correct. The "New AAMT" definitely has not proven itself over time and incidentally they are not there for Americans anymore, they are there for the "overseas community." Humbug on them! Anyone know who could take the place of AAMT for American transcriptionits? After all, we are all Americans here and the language is English.
I would change it to this
Subject: I would change it to this
patients blood pressure readings at home daily have been 90 percent plus. Would leave as is or change........looks wrong.
Patient's daily at home blood pressure readings have been 90%+.
they can change...
Subject: they can change...
depends on what the MD hears on auscultation; that being said, it usually is 3/6, 2-3/6...etc... six is the prime as there are standard 6 heart sounds and the first number being how many of the 6 they hear.
When did p.r.n. change to p.R.n. and why?
Subject: When did p.r.n. change to p.R.n. and why?
nm
I would change it to (sm)
Subject: I would change it to (sm)
CPKs as it appears these labs were done multiple times if they are dictating MBs. I hope I'm making sense.
I'd put, CPKs were high but his MBs were normal.
I would change it to
Subject: I would change it to
Mrs. Smith is a patient on whom I performed rhinoplasty. but that is just me.
Just like you have it, why change anything?
Subject: Just like you have it, why change anything?
x
I always change that to *in regard*..sm
Subject: I always change that to *in regard*..sm
as for toward/towards, afterward/afterwards......both are acceptable as you said per the dictionary......so it depends on the MD I'm working for...I have one that is a stickler so I give him afterwards and towards as he says them.
Exactly, that is why I don't understand, QA does the same with H&H, they change it H and H. Nm
Subject: Exactly, that is why I don't understand, QA does the same with H&H, they change it H and H. Nm
x
...or 'otherwise no overall change"..??? nm
Subject: ...or 'otherwise no overall change"..??? nm
s
I would change it to ൜ mEq K/L" sm
Subject: I would change it to ൜ mEq K/L" sm
The dictator is "slanging" the order. Since what they're ordering is K (potassium) and that is measured in mEq, and since it has a unit of measurement (mEq), then the "/liter" needs to be abbreviated to /L... imho (wouldn't it be nice if they dictated PROPER medication orders?) :)
I'd change to "mg," as well, but (sm)
Subject: I'd change to "mg," as well, but (sm)
the manufacturer's site would seem to indicate it should be hyphenated, as you originally had it.
http://www.jnj.com/index.jsp?content=product/brands/NEUTRA_PHOS.htm
"Prior" change? nm
Subject: "Prior" change? nm
m
yes, but change it to "are"
Subject: yes, but change it to "are"
nm
it looks weird to me too...I always change it to...
Subject: it looks weird to me too...I always change it to...
it's not necessarily correct - but I think about pussy cats and so the *eye is crusty and has pus* is what I'd put. 
Would you change this sentence?
Subject: Would you change this sentence?
His eye contact was intermittent; most of the time his gaze was fixed on whatever toy he was playing with.
...most of the time his gaze was fixed on whatever toy with which he was playing?
Not a verbatim account.
TIA
No, I wouldn't change it because
Subject: No, I wouldn't change it because
it is a myth that there is a problem with that sentence structure.
Do I change it when he dictates cc? nm
Subject: Do I change it when he dictates cc? nm
!
I would change it since account not
Subject: I would change it since account not
verbatim. LOL "hook up with"
Doctors are so funny.
If you are safe to change it, do it.
Subject: If you are safe to change it, do it.
nm
Personally, I'd change it to, I was able to
Subject: Personally, I'd change it to, I was able to
get in touch with the patient's daughter, as I am my own QA. My doc lets me spritz up his letters all the time.
unless you change sentence
Subject: unless you change sentence
I'd leave it because he obviously means that patient had no precipitating symptoms of the chest pain, etc.
|
