possibly - I am sending for review
Posted By: as I am not 100% sure -tx for the help on 2007-11-18
In Reply to: Maybe epiphyseal or growth plate region? nm - wandering
Subject: possibly - I am sending for review
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
Disregard - I am sending for review
Subject: Disregard - I am sending for review
It is Review of Systems and not Review of Symptoms.
Subject: It is Review of Systems and not Review of Symptoms.
thanks -- sending it....
Subject: thanks -- sending it....
that is what I ended up sending
Subject: that is what I ended up sending
THANKS!!
tx for help, I am sending it, too much time
Subject: tx for help, I am sending it, too much time
x
Sending this through with query
Subject: Sending this through with query
Yes...chaz...tuh...zal :) I'm sending for QA, thanks tho!!
Subject: Yes...chaz...tuh...zal :) I'm sending for QA, thanks tho!!
x
prob has something to do with sending it thru like an IV, or Cath or
Subject: prob has something to do with sending it thru like an IV, or Cath or
something. do have you any more info on the patient?
Giving up...sending it back
Subject: Giving up...sending it back
with the blank... Thank you for your suggestions. ;-)
Sending to QA but the full sentance was:
Subject: Sending to QA but the full sentance was:
We will restart his BiPAP nocturnally and bronchodilators ____ q.i.d.
It may be a legitimate word, but I'm sending to QA.
Subject: It may be a legitimate word, but I'm sending to QA.
Thanks but QA keeps sending it back as steri strips
I ended up sending to QA, hope they can figure it out (nm)
Subject: I ended up sending to QA, hope they can figure it out (nm)
I am sending the report in with a blank. Do not worry about it. Thanks anyway. nm
Subject: I am sending the report in with a blank. Do not worry about it. Thanks anyway. nm
ss
Found proper spelling before sending job
Subject: Found proper spelling before sending job
Just to let you all know, I did double check the spelling and found Lisfranc before I sent the report. Wouldn't have found it before because that "K" was messing with my research.
Found confirmation *after* sending it in, but thank you so much for your response. (nm)
Subject: Found confirmation *after* sending it in, but thank you so much for your response. (nm)
x
Anglea, stop sending me emails...sm
Subject: Anglea, stop sending me emails...sm
on every board there is on top of the questions on the right side a little box with 'search', there you can get information about companies.
Thanks you hit it dead on I'm marking and sending through so he can fix it..Teach him how to dict
Subject: Thanks you hit it dead on I'm marking and sending through so he can fix it..Teach him how to dictate..Thanks
Patient with headaches. Sending for s/l uninfused cranial CT scan.
Subject: Patient with headaches. Sending for s/l uninfused cranial CT scan.
Pt with severe headache - will obtain s/l F E axis before sending to hospital. nm
Subject: Pt with severe headache - will obtain s/l F E axis before sending to hospital. nm
X-Ray Review help
Subject: X-Ray Review help
X-RAYS: Review of her x-rays today show that she has a three-part fracture of her proximal humerus with head rotated and the (something ending with) 'osity' displaced. 
Thanks
Thats all in Review of systems.
Subject: Thats all in Review of systems.
Thanks though!
Under review of systems...
Subject: Under review of systems...
Sounds like dictator is saying:
Abdomen: Soft. Flat. Obese. Pressure: Soft. Obese. No point of splenomegaly was noted.
However, it doesn't seem to me that this would fit. He may be saying another heading instead of pressure but it is too jumbled to tell.
Also this may be: No signs of [something] or splenomegally is noted.
Thanks in advance!
Review of Systems
On Review of Systems, he's saying . . ."@#$#&*&(" : No recent skin rash. and then something else "@#$#$" : No anemia or lymph gland problems. Psychiatric - No recent depression. Can anyone tell me what these headings could possibly be? I can't even get enough to give you a "sounds like".
In Review of Systems
Subject: In Review of Systems
There is no history of diabetes, polyuria, polydipsia, seizure, stroke, TIA, loss of strength or sensation, or DVT s/l pulmonary mesin around level bleeding.
It might be 'pulmonary embolism' but I might just be wanting to hear that, it's kind of a stretch. But the rest...
Any ideas??? Thanks.
Record Review: S/L
Subject: Record Review: S/L
'gluteus piriformis intentious fascia lata'
Review of systems
Subject: Review of systems
Review of systems include shortness of breath and s/l ricacaria?? Anyone ...help???
Q in Review of Systems
Subject: Q in Review of Systems
When the doc says - Rest of systems: Negative. do we write it that way or list the systems with Negative next to them all?
Doc doing review. Any ideas? sm
Subject: Doc doing review. Any ideas? sm
Available for review is a s/l “fair-row” seven page typewritten report.
Do you want to know was ROS is? Review of systems.
Subject: Do you want to know was ROS is? Review of systems.
review of systems twice
Subject: review of systems twice
The doc says his normal ROS. At the end of his thought he pauses for a LONG TIME and then says "ROS, on the line, otherwise negative."
So should I do it like I have below or what are your suggestions?
REVIEW OF SYSTEMS: blah blah blah.
A review of systems is otherwise negative.
In review of systems he says,
Subject: In review of systems he says,
"no fevers, chills or sweat s/l size-or-trizer?
Review of Systems
Subject: Review of Systems
Of course...You are correct. I was typing too fast. :-)
Review of Systems
Subject: Review of Systems
I knew that is what you meant.
It is indeed "is"....as review is single.
Subject: It is indeed "is"....as review is single.
 Boy, if that don't make sense, nuthin' does! I fried my brain years ago though...a product called White-Out...hey, it was the 80's and what else was there to do in typin' class?
Ever heard of this? Xray review
Subject: Ever heard of this? Xray review
Review of his x-rays today show no evidence of any s/l 'ab-lateral compartmental arthritis.
wasn't sure if this was an actual word (short for something) or if he possibly tumbled over his words and just meant to say lateral compartmental . . .
thanks for the help.
Disregard - I marked for QA to review.
Subject: Disregard - I marked for QA to review.
Not saying ROS of review of systems is negative? nm
Subject: Not saying ROS of review of systems is negative? nm
s/l taw-tur-tile CRP. Lipid lab review.
Subject: s/l taw-tur-tile CRP. Lipid lab review.
 One of those days when I can't understand anyone!
Other review of systems showed s/l OS negative
Subject: Other review of systems showed s/l OS negative
Other "review of systems" ____ showed s/l "OS" negative.
Review of systems: See HPI (History of Present Illness.)
Subject: Review of systems: See HPI (History of Present Illness.)
Good post for newbies and a review for us oldies who have sm
Subject: Good post for newbies and a review for us oldies who have sm
been transcribing these studies since they were first initiated years ago.
review of systems is "pan positive" with a lot of problems. Is this right? nm
Subject: review of systems is "pan positive" with a lot of problems. Is this right? nm
Is this right "A "ten part" review of systems reveal?
Subject: Is this right "A "ten part" review of systems reveal?
n/t
"Female: Negative" under a male's Review of Systems?
Subject: "Female: Negative" under a male's Review of Systems?
This is the only doc i have ever seen do this... can someone explain? I'm confused.
Psychiatry. Pt with depression and positive s/l "Siggy Capps" review. nm TIA.
Subject: Psychiatry. Pt with depression and positive s/l "Siggy Capps" review. nm TIA.
nm
Review of systems: Chills, night sweats,*commerfid*
Subject: Review of systems: Chills, night sweats,*commerfid*
TIA!
Thanks everyone. I ended up going with edematous paretic, but flagged for review just in case...
Subject: Thanks everyone. I ended up going with edematous paretic, but flagged for review just in case...
nm
14 point review of systems was done s/l weighted, dated and placed in chart. Is that right?
Subject: 14 point review of systems was done s/l weighted, dated and placed in chart. Is that right?
n/t
Pt with migraines with aura, in review of systems, episodic visual s/l C D O's. nm
Subject: Pt with migraines with aura, in review of systems, episodic visual s/l C D O's. nm
doc reviewing a record. Any ideas? Available for review is a s/l “fair-row” seven page typewritten
|
