platelets at 217,000?....2.1 for WBC
Posted By: could be correct - is this a chemo patient?..nm on 2007-07-13
In Reply to: trouble with ESL and lab results... - sm
Subject: platelets at 217,000?....2.1 for WBC
Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old. To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
Platelets ? ...sm
Subject: Platelets ? ...sm
I am confused on the below.
States "platelets, which were (s/l 480 2000 ).
TIA
platelets
Subject: platelets
Her sister said that the family has a history of s/l cathcy? platelets and she has noticed that she has always bruised easily. Thank you
It is done concerning platelets, so therefore
Subject: It is done concerning platelets, so therefore
it is pertinent to surgical risk.
CVA as a risk of low platelets?
Subject: CVA as a risk of low platelets?
Could doc have repeated the word "of" ?
ESL doc: Transfuse one "button" of platelets.
Subject: ESL doc: Transfuse one "button" of platelets.
i can't find in AAMT BOS how to transcribe platelets... yes to 0's or no to 0's
Subject: i can't find in AAMT BOS how to transcribe platelets... yes to 0's or no to 0's
xx
I have heard sporadic platelets with AML. Hope it helps. nm.
Subject: I have heard sporadic platelets with AML. Hope it helps. nm.
x
LABS: hemoglobin 13.2, platelets 237, amylose 18 and lipase 5, TSH 0.6, S/L?charcoal slides 168?
Subject: LABS: hemoglobin 13.2, platelets 237, amylose 18 and lipase 5, TSH 0.6, S/L?charcoal slides 168?
NM
S/L * Rea * for peripheral smear shows slightly decreased platelets. No clumps. Normal white cells
Subject: S/L * Rea * for peripheral smear shows slightly decreased platelets. No clumps. Normal white cells and red cells.
The patient has idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Thanks again.
white count might be 5.3 thousand? platelets in the thousands (K, i.e thousand?)
Subject: white count might be 5.3 thousand? platelets in the thousands (K, i.e thousand?)
|