oh, now I'm confused...just read your post again...
Posted By: vn on 2009-06-28
In Reply to: I think the optic is "captured.." and the haptic... - vn
Subject: oh, now I'm confused...just read your post again...
I think I'll have to research that.
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
Is this correct- motor strength is 4+/5-. The more I read the BOS the more confused I am. TIA nm
Subject: Is this correct- motor strength is 4+/5-. The more I read the BOS the more confused I am. TIA nm
nm
Sorry. Just read your post over and
Subject: Sorry. Just read your post over and
realized you were correcting yourself after what you had found on the internet.
Scary that the internet is giving wrong info too, and a lot of people go by what is on there without double checking.
Again Sorry.
Read the post!
Subject: Read the post!
xx
Now that I read your post
Subject: Now that I read your post
I'm sure in the feet it would be peripheral vascular disease.
Didn't you read my post?
Subject: Didn't you read my post?
Yes, my Stedman's and several other books spell it Kitner. And several other perfectly reputable sources spell it Kittner.
WHICH IS WHY I ASKED 'PLEASE DON'T JUST TELL ME HOW YOUR BOOK SPELLS IT!'
Please, does anyone actually have credible reference as to the person who these tools are named after?
Thank you.
I re-read the initial post
Subject: I re-read the initial post
I misunderstood the original question, so you are probably right.
THANK YOU! I saw I had typed that and not at when I read my post nm
Subject: THANK YOU! I saw I had typed that and not at when I read my post nm
my bad.
sorry, did nto read inside your post. NM
Subject: sorry, did nto read inside your post. NM
x
post malfunctioned...should read " 0 Ti-Cron " nm
Subject: post malfunctioned...should read " 0 Ti-Cron " nm
see message, sorry so late, just read your post
Subject: see message, sorry so late, just read your post
in·a·ni·tion Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[in-uh-nish-uhn] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun 1. exhaustion from lack of nourishment; starvation.
2. lack of vigor; lethargy.
whoops, sorry didn't read your other post....nm
Subject: whoops, sorry didn't read your other post....nm
read her explaining post below charlie
Subject: read her explaining post below charlie
nm
Oops - didn't read your whole post, guess not! nm
Subject: Oops - didn't read your whole post, guess not! nm
x
Thanks. I figured that out after I re-read your post and the differences between the two. Glad you
Subject: Thanks. I figured that out after I re-read your post and the differences between the two. Glad you got it right.
whoops! I didn't read the whole post...not cervicalgia....nm
Subject: whoops! I didn't read the whole post...not cervicalgia....nm
xx
"Didn't you read my post?" and screaming at someone in all caps is RUDE. It's not
Subject: "Didn't you read my post?" and screaming at someone in all caps is RUDE. It's not
excused by please and thank you. And I did have something to offer. I offered that since you can document it either way, either should be correct. FWIW, I googled for (Kitner, Kittner) blunt manufacturer and came up with nada. There is no "credible" reference that's better than what you've got, evidently.
Sorry! Brain MRI = periventricular capping. Read your post too fast. nm.
Subject: Sorry! Brain MRI = periventricular capping. Read your post too fast. nm.
x
overread vs over-read vs over read
Subject: overread vs over-read vs over read
OneLook has a disclaimer for the definition of the word overread that says: This definition is from the 1913 Webster's Dictionary and may be outdated. Some of the links listed on OneLook give the definition, some say the word does not exist, another gives the definition and then says (not used). There are references online for over-read, overread, and over read. I think over-read with a hyphen is a nice compromise. It's situations like this that make me dazed and confused!
On a similar note, I copied and pasted a URL/Link & sent with my post, but it was absent from post.
Subject: On a similar note, I copied and pasted a URL/Link & sent with my post, but it was absent from post.
x
ADMIN, can you post a perm msg to post LOTS of context when asking about WORDS?
Subject: ADMIN, can you post a perm msg to post LOTS of context when asking about WORDS?
thanks
OP's post inside post says not Harrington rods
Subject: OP's post inside post says not Harrington rods
x
confused
Subject: confused
Are you saying that I should expand ST to Electrocardiographic wave segment> or are you agreeing with me that there is no expansion for ST?
Okay, now I'm really confused
Subject: Okay, now I'm really confused
I thought I saw my post come up four times, but now I don't see it at all, so I'll ask one more time. Hopefully this works and I haven't been too annoying!
Okay, so the patient has bilateral otitis externa "and is having a lot of swelling in the [s/l "D man"] and in the nasal mucosa. I injected it with Depo-Medrol and Marcaine and put him on Flonase."
I feel like I should be catching this but I'm stumped! Any ideas?
Confused.
I was transcribing last night on a woman and the doc said quite clearly, twice, that she was post vasectomy. Okay, I figured that maybe this female once was a male. However, by the end of the report I knew that this was not the case. Anyway, I left a QA marker as I figured what the doc said was incorrect and I did not want to be the one to type that information down. I checked on the report today and QA had put in vasectomy, just as I thought he said.
Okay, so my question is: can women get vasectomies?? I thought it was impossible, but after yesterday my confidence is shaken. Women don't have the vas for the ectomy. If I am correct, then why would QA leave something so erroneus in a report? If it were me I would have left it blank.
Please, someone correct me if I am totally wrong.
thanks a lot..... it confused me for a while there. nm
Subject: thanks a lot..... it confused me for a while there. nm
not sure, please SM... so confused!..
Subject: not sure, please SM... so confused!..
thanks... not sure... he continually says what actually sounds like .... "lungs sr"... i have been doing MT for 11+ years and this is now really frustrating me!!!!!!! TY
No. I am not sure. I am actually confused on this one LOL..
Subject: No. I am not sure. I am actually confused on this one LOL..
x
Still confused though.
Subject: Still confused though.
fabere is Flexion, ABduction, External Rotation and extension.
The doc is saying s/l Faber, so I do not know which one to go. So frustrating.
I get confused too sm
Subject: I get confused too sm
track (track) (trak) 1. the path along which something moves, or the mark left by its movement. 2. of pus, to follow the path of least resistance through the tissues, e.g., along an intermuscular septum.
tract (tract) (trakt) [L. tractus] 1. a region, principally one of some length. 2. a collection or bundle of nerve fibers having the same origin, function, and termination (tractus [TA]); see also under bundle, fasciculus, and lemniscus. 3. a number of organs, arranged in series, subserving a common function.
This is according to Dorland's online dictionary. I too get confused but I think it should be track.
confused
Subject: confused
patient needs a s/l lap cholie?
Thank you so much, I was getting confused.
Subject: Thank you so much, I was getting confused.
nm
Confused
Subject: Confused
I always get this confused. Is it Penicillin (brand name) or penicillin (generic)? TIA
confused
Subject: confused
for all I know he could be stuttering right now...lol. s/l minimeniscus tear does that sound like something?
confused
Subject: confused
New doctor. Can't understand 1/4 of dictation. I have no clue what the diagnosis is (some kind of sprain) he talks about the right ankle also the medial deltoid. I am very very confused. I have a ton of blanks and can't understand any of them.
now I'm really confused :)
Subject: now I'm really confused :)
xxx
Confused
Subject: Confused
Is s/he saying midsings or midsigns? You have written both in your post.
confused....lol
Subject: confused....lol
Examination of his left foot shows there is normal configuration. With plantar pressure between the third and fourth metatarsal head and compression, a popping sensation is elicited, consistent with a Morton’s neuroma.
Shouldn't there be a period after configuration? I am so confused every time I read it I come up with something different.
Above I have it with a period after configuration. Do I have that wrong?? tia again.
I, too, have been confused about that over the
Subject: I, too, have been confused about that over the
years - when it does come up, I type it as "Worker's," but "Workers'" might be correct
confused
Subject: confused
I think it is SIF-MDP-Technetium-99. I googled this and think it fits. Try it.
now I'm even more confused
Subject: now I'm even more confused
Wait...! apparently my post did not post
Subject: Wait...! apparently my post did not post
I would do 60%. I have several doctors that will say 60 (as in ) 6-0. Clarifying the numbers so you don't put 16. They do 50, 5-0 so you don't put 15 because they sound close. It just sounds like sixty-six-zero. Put what you feel is right but I would be from experienc it is 60%
Does anyone else get confused over these 2 works? (sm)
Subject: Does anyone else get confused over these 2 works? (sm)
I usually have a hard time trying to figure out which one is best to use and sometimes just have to take a best guess. Anyone have any "tricks" to figure this out on a case-by-case basis? Thanks!
which word - confused
Subject: which word - confused
When referred to x-rays, is it "lumbar plain films" or "lumbar plane films 
Stiil confused
Subject: Stiil confused
I guess I am still confused, she changed a fraction for 1/2 in the person's weight to .5 and I still don't know which rule this would follow under, maybe it is too late at night for me to comprehend.
I don't blame you for being confused.
Subject: I don't blame you for being confused.
In earlier days I was assured that guide wire was a generic term and Guidewire was a brand name, but I sure see it in a lot of sources where it is not capped.
My best guess is yes, cap it, or check with your QA department if you have one.
Confused and tired....
Subject: Confused and tired....
Doc says the patient was given a stool ....s/l wax... to complete and return.
The only thing I have heard of is like stool cards but he is not saying cards. Any suggestions?
Thanks.
Confused with an expression
Subject: Confused with an expression
Dr says he has clear cut proof of ..... Should that be one word or hyphenated? Thanks in advance.
I guess I'm confused
Subject: I guess I'm confused
Doc says sponge, lap and needle counts were correct? Isn't the lap the sponge (laparoscopic sponge)? Would you transcribe sponge, lap, and needle counts were correct or sponge (lap) and needle counts were correct? I hate when something so silly trips me up like this!
Please elaborate on what you are confused about?
Subject: Please elaborate on what you are confused about?
thnx
what exactly is "rostrums" I am confused. I might have to QA it. nm
Subject: what exactly is "rostrums" I am confused. I might have to QA it. nm
nm
That's what I thought - confused ...sm
Subject: That's what I thought - confused ...sm
I just looked at several reports for this patient, and they each have something different!
I wonder if anyone is reading over these reports to catch mistakes......some from last year.
Thanks for helping!
|
