my spellcheck comes up with carbo Taxol
Posted By: ss on 2007-10-25
In Reply to: but carboplatin isn't trade though right? - piglet
Subject: my spellcheck comes up with carbo Taxol
yes, carboplatin is not trade. Then my Pharmaceutical Drug Book has it as Carbo-Tax. Go figure.
I think I will make it the carbo Taxol as in my spellcheck.
Thanks to both of you.
Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old. To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
Seems to be Carbo/Taxol
Subject: Seems to be Carbo/Taxol
carboplatin/Taxol
Subject: carboplatin/Taxol
nm
Carbo
Subject: Carbo
Could it be Carbo?? Carboplatin
neoadjuvant carboplatin and Taxol
Subject: neoadjuvant carboplatin and Taxol
maybe?
taxotere and taxol are both taxoids...which are cytoTOXINS...so maybe they are say'g 4 cycles of
Subject: taxotere and taxol are both taxoids...which are cytoTOXINS...so maybe they are say'g 4 cycles of a toxin such as....nm
d
the carbo part was pretty clear
Subject: the carbo part was pretty clear
who knows though - it could be gabapentin. Maybe the doctor can't read the patient's handwriting or the patient made up their own name for it. I am just going to flag it, since it's an allergy.
I would say you are right with carbo being small "c", it is listed both through the cancer org
Subject: I would say you are right with carbo being small "c", it is listed both through the cancer organizations, but I would say you are correct.
Derm docs often dictate "Allergy to CARBO mix" - sm
Subject: Derm docs often dictate "Allergy to CARBO mix" - sm
I don't know what the full word is, but this validates your hearing the partial "carbo"
Spellcheck
Subject: Spellcheck
If you are using a medical spellchecker program, I don't know why you would use MS word to spell check anything. the spellchecker program runs in the background and underlines everything in red that is misspelled. so much easier than having to do a spell check on every document! just a suggestion.
Both spellcheck, but - sm
Subject: Both spellcheck, but - sm
Nonobstructing spell checks but I always hyphenate it as I think it looks better and is clearer. Just my opinion.
*always - also spellcheck is not always right.
Subject: *always - also spellcheck is not always right.
x
I actually noticed when my spellcheck got it..
Subject: I actually noticed when my spellcheck got it..
not in MY spellcheck, it isn't, and it is Stedman's.
Subject: not in MY spellcheck, it isn't, and it is Stedman's.
I will not use it either. I do not think it is professional looking and if I was still going through training, it would not be acceptable to the school either. but my Stedman's spellcheck will not accept it, either.
Caught that w/ spellcheck afterwards ;) Thanks though.
Subject: Caught that w/ spellcheck afterwards ;) Thanks though.
use spellcheck to your advantage
Subject: use spellcheck to your advantage
If your spellcheck checks for capitalization (like Word), you can just type the med in lower case, and it will mark it as wrong if it needs to be capitalized. You can then put the ones that need to be capitalized into autocorrect so you don't have to memorize brand names.
Thanks. Just checked by spellcheck
Subject: Thanks. Just checked by spellcheck
and fiducials came up.
TY. Spellcheck didn't like it.
Subject: TY. Spellcheck didn't like it.
.
My med spellcheck did not like this word
Subject: My med spellcheck did not like this word
thanks, found the extra "n" once I did spellcheck...nm
Subject: thanks, found the extra "n" once I did spellcheck...nm
word's spellcheck/grammar is not always right...
Subject: word's spellcheck/grammar is not always right...
i have come across that many, many times even with stedmans.
when all else fails with stedmans/word, grab webster.
My spellcheck says Thiersch-Duplay
Subject: My spellcheck says Thiersch-Duplay
and did find Thiersch in surgical word book. See cannot always go by the docs spelling.
That's what I thought - then I ran a spellcheck, but I'm sure that's what I'm hearing.
Subject: That's what I thought - then I ran a spellcheck, but I'm sure that's what I'm hearing.
nm
which Stedman's..?? spellcheck likes either
Subject: which Stedman's..?? spellcheck likes either
Dorland's spellcheck shows it ceruminotic nm
Subject: Dorland's spellcheck shows it ceruminotic nm
x
Stedman's spellcheck was updated in 2002 by
Subject: Stedman's spellcheck was updated in 2002 by
Barb G and if Barb says it is effect it IS effect! The 2002 and 2003 Stedman spellcheck is more accurate than any of their printed or electronic dictionary versions.
d~
Question regarding Microsoft Word Spellcheck sm
Subject: Question regarding Microsoft Word Spellcheck sm
After completing the typing in a Microsoft Word document, I do a spell check. When the spell check is complete, and I have to hit okay, it makes a really, really loud DING, and because I am using ExpressScribe and have to have the volume up on my headphones, it is really causing me problems with how loud the DING is, as it either scares the heck out of me or I also believe it is giving me a headache. So, I have to take my headphones off while doing the spellcheck, so I'm not deaf by the end of the day. I was wondering if anyone knew how to turn off the DING. I would be so appreciative!
my medical spellcheck has mica, not mico
Subject: my medical spellcheck has mica, not mico
Before spellcheck and expanders, we LEARNED the difference!
Subject: Before spellcheck and expanders, we LEARNED the difference!
x
I did find it with Google, but spellcheck doesn't recognize.
Subject: I did find it with Google, but spellcheck doesn't recognize.
In my spellcheck it is written as cardiac wise -- two words; no hypen.
Subject: In my spellcheck it is written as cardiac wise -- two words; no hypen.
Thanks, I came close in my guesses but not close enough for spellcheck to offer a suggestion!
Subject: Thanks, I came close in my guesses but not close enough for spellcheck to offer a suggestion!
|