Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

hemodynamically significant stenosis?

Posted By: MT50 on 2008-02-26
In Reply to: mode anemically? - Lorrie

Subject: hemodynamically significant stenosis?




Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

No evidence for hemodynamically significant stenosis.
Subject: No evidence for hemodynamically significant stenosis.

nm
Could they be slurring cerebral artery stenosis or some other stenosis? nm
Subject: Could they be slurring cerebral artery stenosis or some other stenosis? nm

s
cervical stenosis is spinal stenosis in the neck...sm
Subject: cervical stenosis is spinal stenosis in the neck...sm

It should actually be called

cervical spinal stenosis.
Hemodynamically!
Subject: Hemodynamically!

That's it!!!  It's amazing how words sound so much different when you have an idea of what it might be - especially when the doc has a very heavy accent.  Thanks so much!!!


hemodynamically...NM
Subject: hemodynamically...NM


hemodynamically serious
Subject: hemodynamically serious






Noun 1. hemodynamics - the branch of physiology that studies the circulation of the blood and the forces involved
physiology - the branch of the biological sciences dealing with the functioning of organisms

Is there something in the blank? Hemodynamically? nm
Subject: Is there something in the blank? Hemodynamically? nm

x
Can you hear hemodynamically?
Subject: Can you hear hemodynamically?


mid stenosis, mid-stenosis, midstenosis?
Subject: mid stenosis, mid-stenosis, midstenosis?

Right coronary artery with 80% mid stenosis.

Is this transcribed correctly? Does mid mean middle?
95% LAD stenosis, 50% mid s/l circ stenosis. nm TIA
Subject: 95% LAD stenosis, 50% mid s/l circ stenosis. nm TIA

x
is is neuro foraminal stenosis or neural foraminal stenosis
Subject: is is neuro foraminal stenosis or neural foraminal stenosis

x
is it possible that he says "a significant portion"?
Subject: is it possible that he says "a significant portion"?


significant? stigmata of? nm
Subject: significant? stigmata of? nm

s
No Significant Enlargement?
Subject: No Significant Enlargement?


History significant for "IPP" at age 6?
Subject: History significant for "IPP" at age 6?

I don't see anything in my Abbr. book that might fit this.   s/l IPP or IPT.  Any ideas anyone?  THanks!
A significant relative weakness?
Subject: A significant relative weakness?

He has a significant relative weakness with executive functioning...


Is 'significant relative' correct?


C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 


C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 


C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 


C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 


C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 


C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 


C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 


C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 


C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 


C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 


C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 


C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 


C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 


C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 


C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 


C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 


C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 


NSA = no significant abnormality or no sign. anomaly. nm
Subject: NSA = no significant abnormality or no sign. anomaly. nm


PMH: Significant for s/l valve plus atrial fibrillation. Thank you Debbie
Subject: PMH: Significant for s/l valve plus atrial fibrillation. Thank you Debbie


Family history significant for s/l share-covery II. thank you
Subject: Family history significant for s/l share-covery II. thank you


Does this make sense? No significant pain inversion
Subject: Does this make sense? No significant pain inversion

 


Skip my pitiful answer. Maybe NSD for no significant disease? nm
Subject: Skip my pitiful answer. Maybe NSD for no significant disease? nm


Past medical history: Significant for s/l uterine CA.
Subject: Past medical history: Significant for s/l uterine CA.


patient is a 15-year-old girl with history of significant
Subject: patient is a 15-year-old girl with history of significant

s/l Norwood degenerative type disorder. ???
Sorry, meant inconsistent *bash-A pers*, not significant
Subject: Sorry, meant inconsistent *bash-A pers*, not significant


mid stenosis
Subject: mid stenosis

Yes, it does mean middle and I would type it as mid stenosis.
What about stenosis? nm
Subject: What about stenosis? nm

nm
for Rah:......stenosis...s/m
Subject: for Rah:......stenosis...s/m

As CAD nmeans Coronary Artery disease, maybe it is 'artery stenosis.
Nitro relieves stenosis (narrowing) in the coronary arteries.
Just a guess.
he had significant disease of an ostial diagonal as well as an AV s/l gurve circumflex. thank you
Subject: he had significant disease of an ostial diagonal as well as an AV s/l gurve circumflex. thank you


during cystoscope says bladder was smooth w/o significant s/l cellulosaculos??? or diverticula
Subject: during cystoscope says bladder was smooth w/o significant s/l cellulosaculos??? or diverticula


no significant protuberance with current *s/l* NT tube at intermediate suction
Subject: no significant protuberance with current *s/l* NT tube at intermediate suction

I think he is saying NT or angi or something. I cannot tell. This is in the area of her abdomen and she is being seen for not having bowel movements for two days.
pulmonary stenosis sometimes goes along with that. nm
Subject: pulmonary stenosis sometimes goes along with that. nm


s/l rayonal stenosis??
Subject: s/l rayonal stenosis??

Neck pain; diagnosis of herniated cervical disc and disc bulging with s/l rayonal stenosis


 



I think I got it thanks, it must be foraminal stenosis
Subject: I think I got it thanks, it must be foraminal stenosis


stenosis screw? nm
Subject: stenosis screw? nm