during cystoscope says bladder was smooth w/o significant s/l cellulosaculos??? or diverticula
Posted By: GI question on 2007-09-20
In Reply to:
Subject: during cystoscope says bladder was smooth w/o significant s/l cellulosaculos??? or diverticula
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
TAH/BSO s/l Wapit cystoscope
Subject: TAH/BSO s/l Wapit cystoscope
Foley catheter was removed and then a s/l Wapit cystoscope was inserted uneventfully using a 70-degree lens and using saline solution as distention media.
This is an ESL physician, so it might not even start with a "W" but that is how is sounds. Anyone know what this might be? Thanks.
says during cystoscope..s/l orifoCZ flexed clearly..know that's not it, spelling phonetically Tha
Subject: says during cystoscope..s/l orifoCZ flexed clearly..know that's not it, spelling phonetically Thanks
cysto means bladder, so wouldn't be saying bladder cystocele
Subject: cysto means bladder, so wouldn't be saying bladder cystocele
nm
Bladder flexion? maybe the bladder itself is twisted in some way?
Subject: Bladder flexion? maybe the bladder itself is twisted in some way?
nm
Bladder tact or bladder tack?
Subject: Bladder tact or bladder tack?
TIA
diverticula
Subject: diverticula
diverticulum is singular
diverticula is plural
diverticula (sm)
Subject: diverticula (sm)
diverticula /di·ver·tic·u·la/ (di?ver-tik´u-lah) [L.] plural of diverticulum.
It's diverticuLA or diverticuLUM. No
Subject: It's diverticuLA or diverticuLUM. No
s
Is diverticuli a word? or should it be diverticula?...nm...TIA
Subject: Is diverticuli a word? or should it be diverticula?...nm...TIA
.
s/l bilateral hydrous(?) diverticula
Subject: s/l bilateral hydrous(?) diverticula
On a DS, doc says "This 45 year-old male has bilateral ureteroceles and bilateral (s/l) hydrous(?) diverticula". Have heard of ureteroceles and diverticula but not hydrous diverticula.(?) Thanks for any help.
Might be cellules, saccules, or diverticula...nm
Subject: Might be cellules, saccules, or diverticula...nm
s
is there such a thing as a s/l rare diverticula?
Subject: is there such a thing as a s/l rare diverticula?
maybe smooth throughout, firm?
Subject: maybe smooth throughout, firm?
diverticulum since it is singular, diverticula if plural. nm
Subject: diverticulum since it is singular, diverticula if plural. nm
Probably Anti-smooth antibody-nm
Subject: Probably Anti-smooth antibody-nm
nm
parous, smooth, and without lesions? nm
Subject: parous, smooth, and without lesions? nm
s
smooth or small Hegar dilators?
Subject: smooth or small Hegar dilators?
The cervix was dilated with s/l smooth or small Hegar dilators.
smooth bursal surface thickening?
Subject: smooth bursal surface thickening?
Possibly...
Is this for rheumatology? There is anti-smooth antibody test. nm
Subject: Is this for rheumatology? There is anti-smooth antibody test. nm
x
The chamfer is used to smooth the bone/rim in meniscal surgery....sm
Subject: The chamfer is used to smooth the bone/rim in meniscal surgery....sm
It acts as a contour tool or a sander after debridement/removal/resection. lots of arthroscopies daily, hear this often
Thanks, but it s/l smooth (pear-ass-ol) thickening; he is talking about a leg injury. nm
Subject: Thanks, but it s/l smooth (pear-ass-ol) thickening; he is talking about a leg injury. nm
pelvic phlebolith, seen as a small, smooth, round, white opacity
Subject: pelvic phlebolith, seen as a small, smooth, round, white opacity
is it possible that he says "a significant portion"?
Subject: is it possible that he says "a significant portion"?
significant? stigmata of? nm
Subject: significant? stigmata of? nm
s
No Significant Enlargement?
Subject: No Significant Enlargement?
History significant for "IPP" at age 6?
Subject: History significant for "IPP" at age 6?
I don't see anything in my Abbr. book that might fit this. s/l IPP or IPT. Any ideas anyone? THanks!
hemodynamically significant stenosis?
Subject: hemodynamically significant stenosis?
A significant relative weakness?
Subject: A significant relative weakness?
He has a significant relative weakness with executive functioning...
Is 'significant relative' correct?
No evidence for hemodynamically significant stenosis.
Subject: No evidence for hemodynamically significant stenosis.
nm
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
NSA = no significant abnormality or no sign. anomaly. nm
Subject: NSA = no significant abnormality or no sign. anomaly. nm
PMH: Significant for s/l valve plus atrial fibrillation. Thank you Debbie
Subject: PMH: Significant for s/l valve plus atrial fibrillation. Thank you Debbie
Family history significant for s/l share-covery II. thank you
Subject: Family history significant for s/l share-covery II. thank you
Does this make sense? No significant pain inversion
Subject: Does this make sense? No significant pain inversion
Skip my pitiful answer. Maybe NSD for no significant disease? nm
Subject: Skip my pitiful answer. Maybe NSD for no significant disease? nm
|
