Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

Wrong, b.i.d. is NOT on the dangerous list. q.d. is, though.

Posted By: VB on 2007-04-30
In Reply to: They are both on the - Angela

Subject: Wrong, b.i.d. is NOT on the dangerous list. q.d. is, though.

x


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

But cc is on the dangerous abbreviations list
Subject: But cc is on the dangerous abbreviations list

Most places want you to change to mL (or sometimes even milliliters).



yes - they use dangerous abbreviation list
Subject: yes - they use dangerous abbreviation list


Nothing about that on dangerous abbrvns list, so keep it
Subject: Nothing about that on dangerous abbrvns list, so keep it

s
Duh! Thanks! I should have known that as I have a list of dangerous abbv. nm
Subject: Duh! Thanks! I should have known that as I have a list of dangerous abbv. nm


yes. But may be on list of dangerous abbrevs. sm
Subject: yes. But may be on list of dangerous abbrevs. sm

I used this abbrev a lot but did not do BOS.
does your account follow dangerous abbrevation list?
Subject: does your account follow dangerous abbrevation list?

nm
Link for AAMT dangerous abbrevs list HTH :D
Subject: Link for AAMT dangerous abbrevs list HTH :D

Here's a link to the online AAMT Dangerous Abbreviations list. http://aamtonline.org/abbreviations.htm
We can use q.day, but q.d. must be expanded to every day or daily.
HTH!
Do you have to follow AAMT dangerous abbrevs list?
Subject: Do you have to follow AAMT dangerous abbrevs list?

We have to change 'cc' to 'mL' in nearly every instance now :( because that's listed on the AAMT Dangerous Abbreviations list. Were you able to keep it '2 cc' as above?
Just curious whether that's becoming the standard. (seems to me that most of those 'dangerous abbreviations' would only cause confusion if they were written, not when typed/transcribed...)
You'll have to search for the dangerous abbreviations list to see, but ultimately
Subject: You'll have to search for the dangerous abbreviations list to see, but ultimately

s
I would type q. hour of sleep or at bedtime, q.h.s. is on the dangerous abbrevation list.
Subject: I would type q. hour of sleep or at bedtime, q.h.s. is on the dangerous abbrevation list.

xx
You are correct, doc either gave wrong dosage or wrong drug, would "flag" this for your QA dep
Subject: You are correct, doc either gave wrong dosage or wrong drug, would "flag" this for your QA dept if you have one.


Was this in wrong spot before? We had a slew of responses, all wrong! nm
Subject: Was this in wrong spot before? We had a slew of responses, all wrong! nm

s
Pt list of drugs s/l "thy a do laj" 120 micrograms p.o. q.d. Problem list in message. sm
Subject: Pt list of drugs s/l "thy a do laj" 120 micrograms p.o. q.d. Problem list in message. sm

1.                    Dementia of undetermined etiology.


2.                    Hypothyroidism.


3.                    Osteoporosis. 

History of depression. 
In list of meds...Full bee 1 tab q.a.m. sm for problem list :)
Subject: In list of meds...Full bee 1 tab q.a.m. sm for problem list :)

1.                    Diffuse Lewy body disease mixed with Alzheimer’s disease.


2.                    Generalized anxiety disorder.


3.                    Benign prostatic hypertrophy.

4          Gastroesophageal reflux disease. 
Med list, s/l mylar? drops. No context as in list only. Tx. nm
Subject: Med list, s/l mylar? drops. No context as in list only. Tx. nm

xx
and the reason it's on the dangerous...sm
Subject: and the reason it's on the dangerous...sm

abbreviation list is because h.s. (hour of sleep) is confused with half-strength.  *S*
how do you write Z-pac? also is qid a dangerous
Subject: how do you write Z-pac? also is qid a dangerous

abbreviation?


This is a dangerous abbreviation and should be
Subject: This is a dangerous abbreviation and should be

changed to "at bedtime" but if it is an office note or you don't have to worry about that, it does not need the space after the q. -- q.h.s.
used to be IU/mL but JCAHO says dangerous
Subject: used to be IU/mL but JCAHO says dangerous

international units per mL
Dangerous abbv?
Subject: Dangerous abbv?

I believe the list of dangerous abbreviations says not to use "&" symbol, but to use "and." D&C should be D and C; O&P should be O and P, etc. Not sure if I'm remembering this correctly.

Does anyone know if this sounds correct? Thanks.
It's not a dangerous abbreviation (sm)
Subject: It's not a dangerous abbreviation (sm)

but some platforms do not support symbols like the "&" sign and so you might not be able to type it. On my employer's platform I can't type it or it will cause an error when the report is being sent.
Per BOS - it is "nightly." Look in dangerous
Subject: Per BOS - it is "nightly." Look in dangerous

x
dangerous abbreviations
Subject: dangerous abbreviations

Now please do not flame me for asking, but I am getting confused about some of these.  The one for today is hs.  Is it used at all?  If so, is it hs or h.s.?  I thought it was not used, but substitute "bedtime", but I do not find it in BOS and on page 463 of BOS 2 it lists "BT" as to not use but substitute "hs."  Can anyone give me a definitive reply with citation of source?  Thanks.
q is considered a dangerous
Subject: q is considered a dangerous

abbreviation when standing alone. Unless client wants you to use it, replace with "every."
question about dangerous abbr.
Subject: question about dangerous abbr.

I know that IU (international units) is considered a dangerous abbreviation.  the doctor gives TSH value as UIU so what does that little backwards u stand for and how is it properly expanded??


thanks for helping out this old dummy


cc is now classified as a dangerous abbreviation..
Subject: cc is now classified as a dangerous abbreviation..





























Table 1. Dangerous abbreviations and dosage designations

Problem
Term


Intended
Meaning


Reason for
Problem(s)


Suggested
Remedy


AU


both ears


Read as OU (both eyes) or not understood


Use "both ears"


cc for expressing liquid measurements


cc (same as mL)


Read as u (unit)


Use "mL" when expressing liquid measurements (drugs, urine, blood, etc.)


D/C


discharge


Interpreted as discontinue medications resulting in premature discontinuance of current medication


Use "discharge"


IN


intranasal


Read as IV or IM or heard as IM


Write "intranasal" "nasally" or use "NAS" if limited by computer space allotted


VERY dangerous to guess drugs with sm
Subject: VERY dangerous to guess drugs with sm

someone else's s/l and no text!
dangerous abbreviation-should be discontinue
Subject: dangerous abbreviation-should be discontinue

DC can be discontinue or discharge; hence, JCAHO considers it a dangerous abbreviation.  If you have a verbatim account use d/c his stitches.........
This is now considered to be a dangerous abbrev. Unless...sm
Subject: This is now considered to be a dangerous abbrev. Unless...sm

otherwise stated by the client, use at bedtime or at hour of sleep.
With the dots as in b.i.d. but q.d. is now on Dangerous Abbreviations
Subject: With the dots as in b.i.d. but q.d. is now on Dangerous Abbreviations

s
Can someone help with dangerous abbv question?
Subject: Can someone help with dangerous abbv question?

Patient takes Humulin insulin 70/30. The list says to use per in place of a slash, but it doesn't seem to fit in this case.
FYI - per BOS2, cc is a dangerous abbreviation
Subject: FYI - per BOS2, cc is a dangerous abbreviation

x
DC is considered a dangerous abbreviation
Subject: DC is considered a dangerous abbreviation

per BOS2 and should NOT be used. You use it in the context, not hard to determine if it means discontinue/d or discharge/d.
subq is a dangerous abbreviation and
Subject: subq is a dangerous abbreviation and

is not to be used at all. I use subcutaneous or subcutaneously, whichever one fits.
cc is considered a dangerous abbreviation
Subject: cc is considered a dangerous abbreviation

per BOS, however, if the facility/MTSO, etc. wishes to use cc they trump BOS.
dangerous person NMT is not evening knowing
Subject: dangerous person NMT is not evening knowing

and she IS the one who started it all

she bashes the very company who pays her while she puts them at extraordinary risk

she's dangerous and she doesn't even care -- she's not even made an apology for having done that or even realized what she did other than to cause a stir

she'll never be a quality mt and certainly not a valuable employee with her lack of insight or ethics
pin ... does your acct require you to adhere to dangerous
Subject: pin ... does your acct require you to adhere to dangerous

just asking


MOST places, not all. Some still give the docs whatever they want, dangerous or not. nm
Subject: MOST places, not all. Some still give the docs whatever they want, dangerous or not. nm

s
Joint Commission control the dangerous
Subject: Joint Commission control the dangerous

abbreviations list and not AHDI although the BOS contains information about them. You should check with a supervisor or lead to see about your particular situation. Account specifics usually tell you what is and is not acceptable if you are working for an MTSO who does hospital work. Joint commission rules do not apply in an outpatient or physician's office setting unless the client wants it. If this is a private account then you call the shots with the client's approval.
As q. day is a dangerous abbreviation, the correct format is p.o. daily...:)...nm
Subject: As q. day is a dangerous abbreviation, the correct format is p.o. daily...:)...nm

x
this one is right; ones below are wrong. nm
Subject: this one is right; ones below are wrong. nm

;
perhaps I was wrong
Subject: perhaps I was wrong

Milton, no ulterior motive here. I'm also not a cynic, so perhaps it's best I just graciously back away from this board. You've already answered my question. This is not a board for the likes of executives. The information flying around is inaccurate, and that's the way it will remain. Since most people are smart enough to go to the source when seeking verifiable info, I'll trust the general population to be sensible enough to contact the source if and when in doubt about what they're reading. Sorry to have disturbed you.
they want, EVEN IF THEY ARE WRONG!!! *L*..nm
Subject: they want, EVEN IF THEY ARE WRONG!!! *L*..nm

xx
it wrong, cause 99% it usually is!!!....LOL...nm
Subject: it wrong, cause 99% it usually is!!!....LOL...nm

.
but I could be wrong......*L*......nm
Subject: but I could be wrong......*L*......nm

x
Don't know about that...and I could be way wrong....
Subject: Don't know about that...and I could be way wrong....

but isn't there also an Orthofix screw?
Do you know what's wrong with
Subject: Do you know what's wrong with

the patient?
no, that's the wrong end...thank you though..nm
Subject: no, that's the wrong end...thank you though..nm

nm
You are right, I am wrong - Sorry OP! (nm)
Subject: You are right, I am wrong - Sorry OP! (nm)

zzz
YES! Thanks! I think she just saying it wrong.
Subject: YES! Thanks! I think she just saying it wrong.

THANKS!!!!
YOUR WRONG!
Subject: YOUR WRONG!

I USE THIS SITE EVERY ONCE IN A WHILE, AND I DO HAVE A FULL LINE OF REFERENCE MATERIAL.


 


THANKS AARON, YOU DID MAKE ME FEEL BETTER!