Wonder if it's "coverage"-i.e. insurance coverage
Posted By: bjf on 2007-04-13
In Reply to: physical therapy contingent - k
Subject: Wonder if it's "coverage"-i.e. insurance coverage
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
s/l "kitshocks" with regular insulin coverage
Subject: s/l "kitshocks" with regular insulin coverage
s/l "kitshocks" with regular insulin coverage
Med help: s/l acertec sliding-scale coverage
Subject: Med help: s/l acertec sliding-scale coverage
Thanks.
You might try posting this on the Main Board for greater coverage of people to help.
Subject: You might try posting this on the Main Board for greater coverage of people to help.
Since she is w/o insurance, maybe
Subject: Since she is w/o insurance, maybe
he is providing samples?
health insurance?
Subject: health insurance?
Does anyone have good, "reasonably priced" health insurance to refer for at-home MT? I'm having a terrible time (age 54; good health) Thx!
health insurance
Subject: health insurance
are you an IC?
or are you iso an employer with good benefits?
Does anyone do insurance reports?
Subject: Does anyone do insurance reports?
I called you requesting additional information in order to find out if there is any medical s/l: conjournigation OR conjure negation to work on a full-time basis.
Thanks for any help!
What the insurance does not cover? sm
Subject: What the insurance does not cover? sm
Could it be reworded that way?
insurance raisons?
Subject: insurance raisons?
Insurance reasons, not rasons. Sorry.
I worked in insurance for 8 years before being an MT and.....
Subject: I worked in insurance for 8 years before being an MT and.....
We were told it was Worker's Comp. That was the way the insurance company I worked for at the time wanted it. I think it is just a matter of preference.
Daughter works for insurance - Workers' is the term used now,
Subject: Daughter works for insurance - Workers' is the term used now,
but workmens' is just incorrect English, sorry. If you were to use the old terminology, it would be Workerman's
contigent is correct (pt. used all allowable visits covered by insurance)nm
Subject: contigent is correct (pt. used all allowable visits covered by insurance)nm
x
|
