There was a thread about this on the
Posted By: Gladys on 2005-07-23
In Reply to: sounds like DCEED?? - Deanie
main board. Apparently MT schools aren't providing any training at all in very basic terminology. One wonders what they are teaching.
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
if you are following this whole thread....(sm)
Subject: if you are following this whole thread....(sm)
on QA, etc.
Look down under the *caudal vater syndrome - debbie* at the post with the subject line * LOL!!!!! - sm * It is hilarious. but you really have to be familiar with the whole thread. and if you are not - it is worth the time spent reading down the thread until you get to the LOL!!!!!-sm one.
This was already answered in this thread, it is a
Subject: This was already answered in this thread, it is a
x
I have been IN this thread since it started--sm
Subject: I have been IN this thread since it started--sm
as *nn* as I believe I was the first to comment on this kathie's suggestion for caudal vater syndrome as having nothing to do with the low back. Anyway, then she made the comment about all diabetics having high blood pressure, and it raised the hair on the back of my neck. When I read LOL-sm post, I literally busted up laughing! I thought it was so funny and so FITTING. it put an end to the thread and made every one laugh...good ending to something that was getting ugly and sort of put the QA back a step or two, as well! It was great! Still laughing!
this is a great thread
Subject: this is a great thread
I think we need a whole separate category for this in the left hand blue columm maybe we could call it Sheer Zany Things?
I'm so sorry, this thread has gotten all mixed up!...sm
Subject: I'm so sorry, this thread has gotten all mixed up!...sm
I thought you were the one who posted that it was NOT hyphenated in this case. I see where you were the one who posted the 3 examples. You weren't yelling at me, you were the one who agreed with me. SORRY AGAIN!
LOL! Perhaps I printed yesterday's thread.
Subject: LOL! Perhaps I printed yesterday's thread.
Gotcha.
Debbie, you don't need to start a new thread sm
Subject: Debbie, you don't need to start a new thread sm
each time you add something to a former post. Just "post quick reply" under the thread you wish to clarify or comment.
debbie-you don't have to start new thread for same
Subject: debbie-you don't have to start new thread for same
I've been watching this thread as well, and (sm)
Subject: I've been watching this thread as well, and (sm)
I'm coming up blank, except for the following.....
http://www.unc.edu/~rowlett/units/large.html
Hope you read the entire thread
Subject: Hope you read the entire thread
from top to bottom. I was simply giving some help to the OP. Whether she capitalized or not is her business. I was just trying to point out in a quick instant that the "g" was silent in that word, hence her hearing "cushoined". I am a very friendly and helpful person. I was simply pointing that out to the poster above with the post beginning "you'd be wrong"! So, I guess now I reek of sarcasm. Again, I have broad shoulders... no problem. Glad you took the time to post. 
couching? laying down a thread and fastening it with small stitches at regular intervals
Subject: couching? laying down a thread and fastening it with small stitches at regular intervals
|
