Thanks for responses....nm
Posted By: sounds like it's Type 2 on 2006-07-13
In Reply to: Type II diabetes vs. Type 2....sm - can't confirm one way or the other
Subject: Thanks for responses....nm
nm
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
Thank you for your responses
Subject: Thank you for your responses
Believe it or not, after 20 years of this business this is totally new to me, first time I'm seeing it. It's being dictated quite often as a routine test in the ER and my books just did not have it and I couldn't find it in my abbreviation book or online.
Thanks for all the responses.
Subject: Thanks for all the responses.
I did end up marking it for editing, but it should be interesting to find out what she said!
Thanks for the responses
Subject: Thanks for the responses
I ended up asking my boss and she said to do it DOE, M.D., John. It was interesting seeing the other responses though. I kind of prefer the look of DOE, John, M.D. for some reason but I see the logic of the other way. Anyway, I guess it comes down to preference. Thanks again!
Thanks for all of your responses.
Subject: Thanks for all of your responses.
I guess I just have to deal with this little bump in the road for this one doc. The others I do not have to listen so loud. Fortunately, I have some cool headphones that are very easy to just grab hold of the bottom around my chin, and pull down ever so slightly. Oh, what we go through to keep them happy! Love these guys though, they are so easy to get along with! This is an older gentleman anyway that his voice goes up and down, but I can say he blew his nose (which I am very used to, been there, done that), but hubby had to peel me off the ceiling. It was like mid sentence.... HONK!!! HONK!!!!, wheweee..... gotta luv 'em..... 
Thanks for all the responses!
Subject: Thanks for all the responses!
Very helpful and very appreciated!
Thanks for your responses.
Subject: Thanks for your responses.
He was very clear and did say pound. I also thought it sounded a bit much and wondered if anyone else had ever heard it. The patient had a rash all over her body, so he may have prescribed that large amount for that reason.
rude responses
Subject: rude responses
I have had to deal with rude respones, if people are going to respond rudely, I agree with you, just don't bother. I work for an ENT and have never heard the word you were looking for.
trose
Thanks a bunch for your responses!
Subject: Thanks a bunch for your responses!
Thanks for the quick responses!!
Subject: Thanks for the quick responses!!
From now on, I am only going to use Arabic for doses, etc.
Sorry, didn't see other responses
Subject: Sorry, didn't see other responses
thank you wanderer and nm....for responses...nm
Subject: thank you wanderer and nm....for responses...nm
Thanks for responses; but one thing
Subject: Thanks for responses; but one thing
Thank you all for the responses. My current job has converted to doing VR. There is no incentive program and we don't do line counting, so I have no idea what exactly my line rate would be. I'm considering becoming an employee to a transcription service but IC is not out of the question for me. I wonder if being an IC on a part-time basis may help gauge where I fall in my line count.
thanks for the responses :) I think I will flag nm
Subject: thanks for the responses :) I think I will flag nm
could it be just pain responses
Subject: could it be just pain responses
Thanks for the responses...here is the first part of the report
Subject: Thanks for the responses...here is the first part of the report
LUMBAR SPINE X-Ray
Conus medullaris at the caudal point are within the normal limits. Intervertebral disk at L4-5 has a mildly diminished signal, indicating desiccation at its interchange.
FINDINGS: There is a mild bone centrally with a facet osteothropic but no c nimic canal stenosis...
think they need to refresh their screens to see the responses there. nm
Subject: think they need to refresh their screens to see the responses there. nm
x
Research the responses you get on that board. sm
Subject: Research the responses you get on that board. sm
Most people mean to be helpful, but many provide incorrect answers which they believe are correct.
I think MTBot can get you there.
Psychiatric - s/l Wahdahlian responses (nm) TIA
Subject: Psychiatric - s/l Wahdahlian responses (nm) TIA
x
Should p.o. be changed to oral? Conflicting QA responses. nm
Subject: Should p.o. be changed to oral? Conflicting QA responses. nm
xxxx
Yea, thanks. first time using board, fast responses NM
Subject: Yea, thanks. first time using board, fast responses NM
Just wanted to post a thank you for the responses. I had sent to QA and am awaiting their response.
x
Babinski responses were equivocal for s/l "his known to clonus."
Subject: Babinski responses were equivocal for s/l "his known to clonus."
Babinski responses were equivocal. No ankle clonus.
Subject: Babinski responses were equivocal. No ankle clonus.
x
Thanks. It has been a long day. Your responses are fine. Don't change on my account. Just bee
Subject: Thanks. It has been a long day. Your responses are fine. Don't change on my account. Just been a long day. nm
Was this in wrong spot before? We had a slew of responses, all wrong! nm
Subject: Was this in wrong spot before? We had a slew of responses, all wrong! nm
s
|
