Thanks. I don't have BOS II yet but defintely need to get it.

Posted By: sorry nm on 2007-09-13
In Reply to: Without, page 283 of BOS II. nm - wanderer

Subject: Thanks. I don't have BOS II yet but defintely need to get it.

x

Complete Discussion Below:

marks the location of current message within thread

Which is correct? 1980s or 1980's. Without or - without apostrophe? nm
- Without, page 283 of BOS II. nm - wanderer
  - Thanks. I don't have BOS II yet but defintely need to get it. - sorry nm
    - Might find a used one on half.com. Make sure you get the Second Edition. nm - wanderer
      - my hospital job only supplies BOS I - Thanks sm
        and that was donated. - Thanks sm
- should be with or without. - sorry nm

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Other related messages found in our database

No, defintely not that;
Subject: No, defintely not that;

Unfortunately, had to leave a marker; hopefully will find out soon!

Thanks anyway!

No, it was defintely dysphagia, had undergone swallow study.
Subject: No, it was defintely dysphagia, had undergone swallow study.

and was one of her diagnoses.