Thank you- the "EMIA' part was what I wasn't sure of.
Posted By: Angela on 2008-10-08
In Reply to: LEUKO- White, Colorless, EMIA- Blood or referring to the presence of a substance in the blood - MTISME
Subject: Thank you- the "EMIA' part was what I wasn't sure of.
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
I appreciate your help. It wasn't in my drug book and wasn't sure if I was even hearing it ri
Subject: I appreciate your help. It wasn't in my drug book and wasn't sure if I was even hearing it right.
No, it wasn't, but I wasn't responding to "the OP"
Subject: No, it wasn't, but I wasn't responding to "the OP"
get a hobby
Is there more of the sentence? The 'que' part might be part of a dosage like q.12, etc. nm
Subject: Is there more of the sentence? The 'que' part might be part of a dosage like q.12, etc. nm
s
2-part, 3-part, or 4-part possibly - nm
Subject: 2-part, 3-part, or 4-part possibly - nm
hm...sorry i wasn't able to help! nm
Subject: hm...sorry i wasn't able to help! nm
wasn't the cap - was the E in......nm
Subject: wasn't the cap - was the E in......nm
thanks wasn't quite sure :)
Subject: thanks wasn't quite sure :)
Thank you-wasn't sure
Subject: Thank you-wasn't sure
nm
Oh well, I wasn't much help....sorry - nm
Subject: Oh well, I wasn't much help....sorry - nm
XXX
no that wasn't it.
Subject: no that wasn't it.
Sorry I wasn't more help...
Subject: Sorry I wasn't more help...
Thanks! I wasn't sure about the
Subject: Thanks! I wasn't sure about the
I did see your *lol* and I wasn't angry *LOL*...sm
Subject: I did see your *lol* and I wasn't angry *LOL*...sm
Really, I'm in a good mood! *lol* Have a GREAT day!!! 
No, it wasn't positive (sm)
Subject: No, it wasn't positive (sm)
And I just meant I hadn't ever heard "plus" in front of S1, S2 before. That was what I was questioning. Thanks for taking the time to reply!
It's labral; doc probably wasn't sure which one to use. nm
Subject: It's labral; doc probably wasn't sure which one to use. nm
nm
That wasn't the OPs question, now, was it? nm
Subject: That wasn't the OPs question, now, was it? nm
zzz
Thanks! It wasn't an op note...
Subject: Thanks! It wasn't an op note...
Just someone reviewing the history and there was no elaboration other than that. This particular dictator is killing me tonight...they sound like they are recanting a dream while still out of it themselves...words are trickling out their mouth oh every 15-30 seconds or so and sentences are all malformed, they are yawning, so a 10 minute report is only yielding like 30 lines and I'm falling asleep myself...very frustrating!
If it wasn't a typo:
Subject: If it wasn't a typo:
"bronchial dialator or inhalation therapy"
dilator, not dialator.
nice to see I wasn't the only one who...sm
Subject: nice to see I wasn't the only one who...sm
who misunderstood OP's query...*LOL* - WELCOME TO THE CLUB!!! 
Nope, it sure wasn't and...
Subject: Nope, it sure wasn't and...
we actually had to work with some live stuff in training, was always thinking I had the symptoms of everthing we worked with!
Great help, wasn't it!
Subject: Great help, wasn't it!
Tried searching every which way on that one! Have to say I hang out here a lot, usually not of much help to anyone myself, but sure a lot of useful info and links from others! Thanks to everyone who helps here, including you, Hayseed. You rock and really enjoy your posts! 
I came across that term thanks wasn't quite sure :)
Subject: I came across that term thanks wasn't quite sure :)
I just wasn't sure if there was a "right" way..
Subject: I just wasn't sure if there was a "right" way..
nm
You're welcome, wish I wasn't! :-(
Subject: You're welcome, wish I wasn't! :-(
That's how I looked at it, too, but just wasn't sure. nm
Subject: That's how I looked at it, too, but just wasn't sure. nm
nm
Oops, I'm sorry, you said it definitely wasn't that!!!!
Subject: Oops, I'm sorry, you said it definitely wasn't that!!!!
:o)
wasn't trying to just guess sm
Subject: wasn't trying to just guess sm
I wasn't sure if it was something more popular I should know but didn't
I'm sorry I wasn't more clear on that.
Subject: I'm sorry I wasn't more clear on that.
thanks, but that wasn't the question?!
Subject: thanks, but that wasn't the question?!
xx
it helped to know I wasn't crazy!
Subject: it helped to know I wasn't crazy!
That's what I thought, but QA said it wasn't correct.
Subject: That's what I thought, but QA said it wasn't correct.
That's what I thought, but QA said it wasn't correct. But I can't find any documentation either way.
wasn't trying to be rude, just the suggestions--sm
Subject: wasn't trying to be rude, just the suggestions--sm
given had absolutely nothing to do with the low back, which she specifically mentioned in her post. Not all MTs are way off in what they are asking about or looking for and some of these suggestions that have nothing to do with their requests can be very misleading, as well. JMO and again, not meant to be rude.
No wasn't Lamisil. I flagged it. Thanks though. nm
Subject: No wasn't Lamisil. I flagged it. Thanks though. nm
nm
wasn't being nasty as you put it - I merely asked
Subject: wasn't being nasty as you put it - I merely asked
how you can interpret a simple question being *nasty* is beyond belief....I asked because she never posted before 3/1 and there are a slew of questions - and is the ONLY reason I asked if she was testing. I showed and had no attitude in my question BUT YOU SURE DID !!!
around these here parts, I guess one is dam*ed if you do and dam*ed if you don't.
Thanks, I sent for QA. Wasn't Charcot, maybe Kidner.
Subject: Thanks, I sent for QA. Wasn't Charcot, maybe Kidner.
You are so right! She is the second twin. I just wasn't thinking that way. THX!
Subject: You are so right! She is the second twin. I just wasn't thinking that way. THX!
Nah, sorry I wasn't clear. Just trying to point it out so
Subject: Nah, sorry I wasn't clear. Just trying to point it out so
s
Thanks. That's what I thought but wasn't positive
Subject: Thanks. That's what I thought but wasn't positive
I knew that wasn't right, just having a bad morning!
Subject: I knew that wasn't right, just having a bad morning!
thanks! I should have looked it up but I was so sure it wasn't really a word...LOL nm
Subject: thanks! I should have looked it up but I was so sure it wasn't really a word...LOL nm
Thanks. Was trying to hear glossitis, but the s wasn't there.
Subject: Thanks. Was trying to hear glossitis, but the s wasn't there.
x
And he wasn't meaning "propensity"? -nm
Subject: And he wasn't meaning "propensity"? -nm
That's what I thought it was, but it wasn't in my ref book, thanks.
Subject: That's what I thought it was, but it wasn't in my ref book, thanks.
xx
oops, sorry I wasn't clear, sm
Subject: oops, sorry I wasn't clear, sm
I meant to suggest that "with a lauer" might not be "with a lauer" but rather may be something ***areolar, like subareolar, but could be way off here.
oops, sorry I wasn't clear, sm
Subject: oops, sorry I wasn't clear, sm
I meant to suggest that "with a lauer" might not be "with a lauer" but rather may be something ***areolar, like subareolar, but could be way off here.
possibly. it's what i was thinking but wasn't sure. thanx!
Subject: possibly. it's what i was thinking but wasn't sure. thanx!
sorry my question wasn't clear...
Subject: sorry my question wasn't clear...
The word before radiolucency is in question. It sounds like the doctor is saying or but that does not seem like it fits in the sentence. :-) sorry for the confusion. Any ideas on the word before radiolucency?
No it wasn't. The only answer given was borderline enlarged, which is not quite right. sm
Subject: No it wasn't. The only answer given was borderline enlarged, which is not quite right. sm
generous equals large, not borderline enlarged.
Sorry for the repeats! I was getting a message it wasn't working.
Subject: Sorry for the repeats! I was getting a message it wasn't working.
Yah, but I wasn't sure the original questioner did, sorry if I made you mad :)
Subject: Yah, but I wasn't sure the original questioner did, sorry if I made you mad :)
Thanks for the confirmation. I finally went with it. I decided it wasn't
Subject: Thanks for the confirmation. I finally went with it. I decided it wasn't
any worse than saying "stab incision," LOL.
|
