Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

TY. Spellcheck didn't like it.

Posted By: nm on 2007-11-29
In Reply to: Yes per www.thefreedictionary.com - MT50

Subject: TY. Spellcheck didn't like it.

.


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

I did Google it, but I didn't know it was a hearing test it didn't pop up. Sorry to bother you
Subject: I did Google it, but I didn't know it was a hearing test it didn't pop up. Sorry to bother you.


No, I didn't mean that as a slam that you didn't research!!!
Subject: No, I didn't mean that as a slam that you didn't research!!!

I just meant that it's checked and verified for you.  Shitzoo showed up on Google, too.  LOL 
Spellcheck
Subject: Spellcheck

If you are using a medical spellchecker program, I don't know why you would use MS word to spell check anything. the spellchecker program runs in the background and underlines everything in red that is misspelled. so much easier than having to do a spell check on every document! just a suggestion.
Both spellcheck, but - sm
Subject: Both spellcheck, but - sm

Nonobstructing spell checks but I always hyphenate it as I think it looks better and is clearer. Just my opinion.


*always - also spellcheck is not always right.
Subject: *always - also spellcheck is not always right.

x
I actually noticed when my spellcheck got it..
Subject: I actually noticed when my spellcheck got it..


not in MY spellcheck, it isn't, and it is Stedman's.
Subject: not in MY spellcheck, it isn't, and it is Stedman's.

I will not use it either. I do not think it is professional looking and if I was still going through training, it would not be acceptable to the school either. but my Stedman's spellcheck will not accept it, either.
Caught that w/ spellcheck afterwards ;) Thanks though.
Subject: Caught that w/ spellcheck afterwards ;) Thanks though.


use spellcheck to your advantage
Subject: use spellcheck to your advantage

If your spellcheck checks for capitalization (like Word), you can just type the med in lower case, and it will mark it as wrong if it needs to be capitalized. You can then put the ones that need to be capitalized into autocorrect so you don't have to memorize brand names.
Thanks. Just checked by spellcheck
Subject: Thanks. Just checked by spellcheck

and fiducials came up.
My med spellcheck did not like this word
Subject: My med spellcheck did not like this word


thanks, found the extra "n" once I did spellcheck...nm
Subject: thanks, found the extra "n" once I did spellcheck...nm


word's spellcheck/grammar is not always right...
Subject: word's spellcheck/grammar is not always right...

i have come across that many, many times even with stedmans.

when all else fails with stedmans/word, grab webster.
My spellcheck says Thiersch-Duplay
Subject: My spellcheck says Thiersch-Duplay

and did find Thiersch in surgical word book. See cannot always go by the docs spelling.
my spellcheck comes up with carbo Taxol
Subject: my spellcheck comes up with carbo Taxol

yes, carboplatin is not trade. Then my Pharmaceutical Drug Book has it as Carbo-Tax. Go figure.
I think I will make it the carbo Taxol as in my spellcheck.

Thanks to both of you.
That's what I thought - then I ran a spellcheck, but I'm sure that's what I'm hearing.
Subject: That's what I thought - then I ran a spellcheck, but I'm sure that's what I'm hearing.

nm
which Stedman's..?? spellcheck likes either
Subject: which Stedman's..?? spellcheck likes either


Dorland's spellcheck shows it ceruminotic nm
Subject: Dorland's spellcheck shows it ceruminotic nm

x
Stedman's spellcheck was updated in 2002 by
Subject: Stedman's spellcheck was updated in 2002 by

Barb G and if Barb says it is effect it IS effect! The 2002 and 2003 Stedman spellcheck is more accurate than any of their printed or electronic dictionary versions.
d~
Question regarding Microsoft Word Spellcheck sm
Subject: Question regarding Microsoft Word Spellcheck sm

After completing the typing in a Microsoft Word document, I do a spell check.  When the spell check is complete, and I have to hit okay, it makes a really, really loud DING, and because I am using ExpressScribe and have to have the volume up on my headphones, it is really causing me problems with how loud the DING is, as it either scares the heck out of me or I also believe it is giving me a headache.  So, I have to take my headphones off while doing the spellcheck, so I'm not deaf by the end of the day.  I was wondering if anyone knew how to turn off the DING.  I would be so appreciative! 


 


 


my medical spellcheck has mica, not mico
Subject: my medical spellcheck has mica, not mico


Before spellcheck and expanders, we LEARNED the difference!
Subject: Before spellcheck and expanders, we LEARNED the difference!

x
I did find it with Google, but spellcheck doesn't recognize.
Subject: I did find it with Google, but spellcheck doesn't recognize.


Thanks again...tried that but didn't get anything because I didn't know how to spell it. (nm)
Subject: Thanks again...tried that but didn't get anything because I didn't know how to spell it. (nm)

x
In my spellcheck it is written as cardiac wise -- two words; no hypen.
Subject: In my spellcheck it is written as cardiac wise -- two words; no hypen.


Thanks, I came close in my guesses but not close enough for spellcheck to offer a suggestion!
Subject: Thanks, I came close in my guesses but not close enough for spellcheck to offer a suggestion!


Didn't think of that! Thanks!! nm
Subject: Didn't think of that! Thanks!! nm

x
No, you didn't. nm
Subject: No, you didn't. nm

x
Oh! Thank you - wonder why this didn't
Subject: Oh! Thank you - wonder why this didn't

come up on my abbreviation website!
You know, I didn't think of that....sm
Subject: You know, I didn't think of that....sm

I am going to listen again and I bet that is it. Thank you so much!
I didn't see that, thank you!
Subject: I didn't see that, thank you!

x
Thank you. I didn't think of that.
Subject: Thank you. I didn't think of that.

You could be right. 
I didn't think it could come
Subject: I didn't think it could come

in 1200 mg. I left a discrepancy marker in 1 of my reports for this, and the QA took out my marker and put in Dilaudid 1200 mg like the dictator said. Go figure.
I didn't think of that - this could be it! Thanks. nm
Subject: I didn't think of that - this could be it! Thanks. nm

x
Okay, just didn't think
Subject: Okay, just didn't think

she lie herself down sounded right, so wanted to be sure. Thanks!
I didn't have the
Subject: I didn't have the

first one, but I use 911 all the time for everything! I've done a few OP reports, but I have 34 to do today and I am on my 5th one after 2 hours of working! Thanks for the help!
didn't think so! - nm
Subject: didn't think so! - nm


Didn't you ever get this?
Subject: Didn't you ever get this?

The reason it didn't occur to people was that you didn't give enough information to let them know it was part of the physical exam, either HEENT or neuro exam. When clues are provided, people are happy to help. Otherwise it's a lot of effort on their part and none on the person asking the question.

Conjugate gaze palsy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Conjugate gaze palsy refers to an inability of both eyes to move in the same direction ... Other binocular: Conjugate gaze palsy - Convergence insufficiency ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conjugate_gaze_palsy - 31k - Cached - Similar pages
oh wow i didn't see that thank you!
Subject: oh wow i didn't see that thank you!


She didn't
Subject: She didn't

you must not have read her post, which states:

"I agree it looks weird, but "appropriate for gestational age" is a compound modifier for "infant." Weird or not, that's the way it is. My opinion, if the correct way looks too "weird" for you and you don't mind getting pinged by QA, then use no hyphens at all because "gestational- age" definitely should not be hyphenated."

Another option, if this is not a verbatim account, would be to re-cast the sentence.
Sorry. I didn't know that. nm
Subject: Sorry. I didn't know that. nm


Didn't mean to
Subject: Didn't mean to

add past tense. Sorry... :-)
You didn't think it may have
Subject: You didn't think it may have

been BioCleanse?? :-)
I didn't know you
Subject: I didn't know you

could drink marijuana...What will they think of next???
I didn't say
Subject: I didn't say

IBS "disease." You did..
THANK YOU...I almost didn't
Subject: THANK YOU...I almost didn't

hear joint in there. Thanks a million :-)
not sure why that didn't come through, but should
Subject: not sure why that didn't come through, but should

be the number "1"
sorry it didn't post right - here it is
Subject: sorry it didn't post right - here it is

http://www.answers.com/topic/intravenous-therapy

d~
didn't find it
Subject: didn't find it

thanks for the list, but didn't see anything similar
sry didn't see post. tks!
Subject: sry didn't see post. tks!


No I didn't mind
Subject: No I didn't mind

I'm suspect of the real identity of the person posting as the president of Sten-Tel (in 2 places already).  I guess my attention wasn't garned here so it was reposted at the top of the board.  Anyway I said what I felt I wanted to say and he didn't want to engage, so I can let it be.