Sorry, meant inconsistent *bash-A pers*, not significant
Posted By: nm on 2009-03-13
In Reply to: FCE...s/l *bash-A pers* - sm
Subject: Sorry, meant inconsistent *bash-A pers*, not significant
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
FCE...s/l *bash-A pers*
Subject: FCE...s/l *bash-A pers*
Patient is status post de Quervain release and had an FCE showing self-limiting behaviors and significant *bash-A pers*.
Any ideas? TIA.
inconsistent behaviors?
Subject: inconsistent behaviors?
is it possible that he says "a significant portion"?
Subject: is it possible that he says "a significant portion"?
significant? stigmata of? nm
Subject: significant? stigmata of? nm
s
No Significant Enlargement?
Subject: No Significant Enlargement?
History significant for "IPP" at age 6?
Subject: History significant for "IPP" at age 6?
I don't see anything in my Abbr. book that might fit this. s/l IPP or IPT. Any ideas anyone? THanks!
hemodynamically significant stenosis?
Subject: hemodynamically significant stenosis?
A significant relative weakness?
Subject: A significant relative weakness?
He has a significant relative weakness with executive functioning...
Is 'significant relative' correct?
No evidence for hemodynamically significant stenosis.
Subject: No evidence for hemodynamically significant stenosis.
nm
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
NSA = no significant abnormality or no sign. anomaly. nm
Subject: NSA = no significant abnormality or no sign. anomaly. nm
PMH: Significant for s/l valve plus atrial fibrillation. Thank you Debbie
Subject: PMH: Significant for s/l valve plus atrial fibrillation. Thank you Debbie
Family history significant for s/l share-covery II. thank you
Subject: Family history significant for s/l share-covery II. thank you
Does this make sense? No significant pain inversion
Subject: Does this make sense? No significant pain inversion
Skip my pitiful answer. Maybe NSD for no significant disease? nm
Subject: Skip my pitiful answer. Maybe NSD for no significant disease? nm
Past medical history: Significant for s/l uterine CA.
Subject: Past medical history: Significant for s/l uterine CA.
patient is a 15-year-old girl with history of significant
Subject: patient is a 15-year-old girl with history of significant
s/l Norwood degenerative type disorder. ???
he had significant disease of an ostial diagonal as well as an AV s/l gurve circumflex. thank you
Subject: he had significant disease of an ostial diagonal as well as an AV s/l gurve circumflex. thank you
during cystoscope says bladder was smooth w/o significant s/l cellulosaculos??? or diverticula
Subject: during cystoscope says bladder was smooth w/o significant s/l cellulosaculos??? or diverticula
no significant protuberance with current *s/l* NT tube at intermediate suction
Subject: no significant protuberance with current *s/l* NT tube at intermediate suction
I think he is saying NT or angi or something. I cannot tell. This is in the area of her abdomen and she is being seen for not having bowel movements for two days.
Pt had a cardiac cath which showed no significant *coronary obstucting to his knees*.
Subject: Pt had a cardiac cath which showed no significant *coronary obstucting to his knees*.
Past medical history significant for s/l wrekal sinus excision
Subject: Past medical history significant for s/l wrekal sinus excision
The patient has had an abdominal CT scan in January 2006 which showed significant intra- and extra b
Subject: The patient has had an abdominal CT scan in January 2006 which showed significant intra- and extra b
The patient has had an abdominal CT scan in January 2006 which showed significant intra- and extra biliary tree dilatation, but this was unchanged from a previous scan of 2003.
I am specifically wondering about the hypen after intra. Thanks.
pleural effusion is smaller but has significant amount of free flowing fluid on the s/l *cubulous*
Subject: pleural effusion is smaller but has significant amount of free flowing fluid on the s/l *cubulous*
osteonecrosis- pt had "a bone scan significant for area of intense focal [s/l bony labeling]"?
Subject: osteonecrosis- pt had "a bone scan significant for area of intense focal [s/l bony labeling]"?
The whole sentence reads thusly:
The patient also underwent bone scan, this being significant for an area of intense [s/l focal bony labeling] involving the lateral epicondyle of the right femur in an individual without history of trauma, and given his history of aseptic necrosis of the femoral head, it was felt that this might be reflective of osteonecrosis including "osteochondritis desiccans."
Thanks in advance for any help.
The knee is pain significant because she had a total knee replacement. Make sense? nm
Subject: The knee is pain significant because she had a total knee replacement. Make sense? nm
,,
There is significant medial and medial *peripatellar* pain with hyperflexion.
Subject: There is significant medial and medial *peripatellar* pain with hyperflexion.
There is significant medial and medial *peripatellar* pain with hyperflexion.
Subject: There is significant medial and medial *peripatellar* pain with hyperflexion.
There is significant medial and medial s/l peripatellar pain with hyperflexion.
Subject: There is significant medial and medial s/l peripatellar pain with hyperflexion.
He does have a mild s/l pivot lie, but no significant pivot shift
Subject: He does have a mild s/l pivot lie, but no significant pivot shift
Thanks :-)
Significant for hypertension, coronary artery disease,?? coronary artery bypass grafting... s/l ....
Subject: Significant for hypertension, coronary artery disease,?? coronary artery bypass grafting... s/l ....
fastras. Patient has had several femoral bypass grafting as well as aortobifemoral bypass grafting in the past.
No, and I meant to IJV...sorry
Subject: No, and I meant to IJV...sorry
This guy is such a mumbler. He says the name of the balloon catheter twice in the report and I can't get it either time. I'm about to give up and leave blanks.....
I meant - Anyone know?
Subject: I meant - Anyone know?
.
maybe he meant..
Subject: maybe he meant..
SPEP
serum protein electrophoresis?
JMO-I don't think that is what is meant.--sm
Subject: JMO-I don't think that is what is meant.--sm
I checked on google as well, and the closest I could come to this term medically was that the patient was malingering. I do not think that fits with this case. but could be wrong. jmo
|
