Sorry, didn't see other responses
Posted By: AnMT on 2006-12-13
In Reply to: word help - AnMT
Subject: Sorry, didn't see other responses
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
I did Google it, but I didn't know it was a hearing test it didn't pop up. Sorry to bother you
Subject: I did Google it, but I didn't know it was a hearing test it didn't pop up. Sorry to bother you.
No, I didn't mean that as a slam that you didn't research!!!
Subject: No, I didn't mean that as a slam that you didn't research!!!
I just meant that it's checked and verified for you. Shitzoo showed up on Google, too. LOL
Thanks for responses....nm
Subject: Thanks for responses....nm
nm
Thank you for your responses
Subject: Thank you for your responses
Believe it or not, after 20 years of this business this is totally new to me, first time I'm seeing it. It's being dictated quite often as a routine test in the ER and my books just did not have it and I couldn't find it in my abbreviation book or online.
Thanks for all the responses.
Subject: Thanks for all the responses.
I did end up marking it for editing, but it should be interesting to find out what she said!
Thanks for the responses
Subject: Thanks for the responses
I ended up asking my boss and she said to do it DOE, M.D., John. It was interesting seeing the other responses though. I kind of prefer the look of DOE, John, M.D. for some reason but I see the logic of the other way. Anyway, I guess it comes down to preference. Thanks again!
Thanks for all of your responses.
Subject: Thanks for all of your responses.
I guess I just have to deal with this little bump in the road for this one doc. The others I do not have to listen so loud. Fortunately, I have some cool headphones that are very easy to just grab hold of the bottom around my chin, and pull down ever so slightly. Oh, what we go through to keep them happy! Love these guys though, they are so easy to get along with! This is an older gentleman anyway that his voice goes up and down, but I can say he blew his nose (which I am very used to, been there, done that), but hubby had to peel me off the ceiling. It was like mid sentence.... HONK!!! HONK!!!!, wheweee..... gotta luv 'em..... 
Thanks for all the responses!
Subject: Thanks for all the responses!
Very helpful and very appreciated!
Thanks for your responses.
Subject: Thanks for your responses.
He was very clear and did say pound. I also thought it sounded a bit much and wondered if anyone else had ever heard it. The patient had a rash all over her body, so he may have prescribed that large amount for that reason.
rude responses
Subject: rude responses
I have had to deal with rude respones, if people are going to respond rudely, I agree with you, just don't bother. I work for an ENT and have never heard the word you were looking for.
trose
Thanks a bunch for your responses!
Subject: Thanks a bunch for your responses!
Thanks for the quick responses!!
Subject: Thanks for the quick responses!!
From now on, I am only going to use Arabic for doses, etc.
thank you wanderer and nm....for responses...nm
Subject: thank you wanderer and nm....for responses...nm
Thanks for responses; but one thing
Subject: Thanks for responses; but one thing
Thank you all for the responses. My current job has converted to doing VR. There is no incentive program and we don't do line counting, so I have no idea what exactly my line rate would be. I'm considering becoming an employee to a transcription service but IC is not out of the question for me. I wonder if being an IC on a part-time basis may help gauge where I fall in my line count.
thanks for the responses :) I think I will flag nm
Subject: thanks for the responses :) I think I will flag nm
could it be just pain responses
Subject: could it be just pain responses
Thanks for the responses...here is the first part of the report
Subject: Thanks for the responses...here is the first part of the report
LUMBAR SPINE X-Ray
Conus medullaris at the caudal point are within the normal limits. Intervertebral disk at L4-5 has a mildly diminished signal, indicating desiccation at its interchange.
FINDINGS: There is a mild bone centrally with a facet osteothropic but no c nimic canal stenosis...
think they need to refresh their screens to see the responses there. nm
Subject: think they need to refresh their screens to see the responses there. nm
x
Research the responses you get on that board. sm
Subject: Research the responses you get on that board. sm
Most people mean to be helpful, but many provide incorrect answers which they believe are correct.
I think MTBot can get you there.
Psychiatric - s/l Wahdahlian responses (nm) TIA
Subject: Psychiatric - s/l Wahdahlian responses (nm) TIA
x
Should p.o. be changed to oral? Conflicting QA responses. nm
Subject: Should p.o. be changed to oral? Conflicting QA responses. nm
xxxx
Yea, thanks. first time using board, fast responses NM
Subject: Yea, thanks. first time using board, fast responses NM
Just wanted to post a thank you for the responses. I had sent to QA and am awaiting their response.
x
Babinski responses were equivocal for s/l "his known to clonus."
Subject: Babinski responses were equivocal for s/l "his known to clonus."
Babinski responses were equivocal. No ankle clonus.
Subject: Babinski responses were equivocal. No ankle clonus.
x
Thanks. It has been a long day. Your responses are fine. Don't change on my account. Just bee
Subject: Thanks. It has been a long day. Your responses are fine. Don't change on my account. Just been a long day. nm
Thanks again...tried that but didn't get anything because I didn't know how to spell it. (nm)
Subject: Thanks again...tried that but didn't get anything because I didn't know how to spell it. (nm)
x
Was this in wrong spot before? We had a slew of responses, all wrong! nm
Subject: Was this in wrong spot before? We had a slew of responses, all wrong! nm
s
Didn't think of that! Thanks!! nm
Subject: Didn't think of that! Thanks!! nm
x
No, you didn't. nm
Subject: No, you didn't. nm
x
Oh! Thank you - wonder why this didn't
Subject: Oh! Thank you - wonder why this didn't
come up on my abbreviation website!
You know, I didn't think of that....sm
Subject: You know, I didn't think of that....sm
I am going to listen again and I bet that is it. Thank you so much!
I didn't see that, thank you!
Subject: I didn't see that, thank you!
x
Thank you. I didn't think of that.
Subject: Thank you. I didn't think of that.
You could be right.
I didn't think it could come
Subject: I didn't think it could come
in 1200 mg. I left a discrepancy marker in 1 of my reports for this, and the QA took out my marker and put in Dilaudid 1200 mg like the dictator said. Go figure.
I didn't think of that - this could be it! Thanks. nm
Subject: I didn't think of that - this could be it! Thanks. nm
x
Okay, just didn't think
Subject: Okay, just didn't think
she lie herself down sounded right, so wanted to be sure. Thanks!
I didn't have the
Subject: I didn't have the
first one, but I use 911 all the time for everything! I've done a few OP reports, but I have 34 to do today and I am on my 5th one after 2 hours of working! Thanks for the help!
didn't think so! - nm
Subject: didn't think so! - nm
Didn't you ever get this?
Subject: Didn't you ever get this?
The reason it didn't occur to people was that you didn't give enough information to let them know it was part of the physical exam, either HEENT or neuro exam. When clues are provided, people are happy to help. Otherwise it's a lot of effort on their part and none on the person asking the question.
Conjugate gaze palsy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Conjugate gaze palsy refers to an inability of both eyes to move in the same direction ... Other binocular: Conjugate gaze palsy - Convergence insufficiency ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conjugate_gaze_palsy - 31k - Cached - Similar pages
oh wow i didn't see that thank you!
Subject: oh wow i didn't see that thank you!
She didn't
Subject: She didn't
you must not have read her post, which states:
"I agree it looks weird, but "appropriate for gestational age" is a compound modifier for "infant." Weird or not, that's the way it is. My opinion, if the correct way looks too "weird" for you and you don't mind getting pinged by QA, then use no hyphens at all because "gestational- age" definitely should not be hyphenated."
Another option, if this is not a verbatim account, would be to re-cast the sentence.
Sorry. I didn't know that. nm
Subject: Sorry. I didn't know that. nm
Didn't mean to
Subject: Didn't mean to
add past tense. Sorry... :-)
You didn't think it may have
Subject: You didn't think it may have
been BioCleanse?? :-)
I didn't know you
Subject: I didn't know you
could drink marijuana...What will they think of next???
I didn't say
Subject: I didn't say
IBS "disease." You did..
THANK YOU...I almost didn't
Subject: THANK YOU...I almost didn't
hear joint in there. Thanks a million :-)
not sure why that didn't come through, but should
Subject: not sure why that didn't come through, but should
be the number "1"
sorry it didn't post right - here it is
Subject: sorry it didn't post right - here it is
http://www.answers.com/topic/intravenous-therapy
d~
didn't find it
Subject: didn't find it
thanks for the list, but didn't see anything similar
|
