RE: How is it you say red cells per high powered field?
Posted By: Shelly Hendrix on 2006-07-14
In Reply to: How is it you say red cells per high powered field? - Cant remember?
Subject: RE: How is it you say red cells per high powered field?
RBC/HPF OR red blood cells/high-powered field (the first is preferred since it is well-known laboratory abbreviation).
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
How is it you say red cells per high powered field?
Subject: How is it you say red cells per high powered field?
TIA!
For one and for all, is it high power field or high powered field?? Also the hypen thing...
Subject: For one and for all, is it high power field or high powered field?? Also the hypen thing...
I spent a load of money getting trained for MT and I STILL am not sure about this. What do the experienced MTs think??
per high power field OR per high powered field.
Subject: per high power field OR per high powered field.
high powered field
Subject: high powered field
I have always been told it is high powered field.
HPF...high powered field nm
Subject: HPF...high powered field nm
can you hear high powered field?
Subject: can you hear high powered field?
instead of hypofield?
Yes!!! I do hear high powered field---
Subject: Yes!!! I do hear high powered field---
So is she saying 851 50 double O for high powered field? is that right?
0 to1 red blood cell per high powered field"
Subject: 0 to1 red blood cell per high powered field"
Sorry!
When I was making the post, it showed the highlighted section, but I guess it didn't actually post that way..."0 to1 red blood cell per high powered field" was what I was questioning
re: 5 and 8 red blood cells (or RBCs) per high power field.
Subject: re: 5 and 8 red blood cells (or RBCs) per high power field.
It is high powered field
Red ( or white) blood cells per high-power field
Consult anyone please?
RBC/HPF or RBCs/HPF or since she says the whole thing out do I type the whole thing out? Usually I know but I must admit I am stumped.
Thanks!
last one! Urinalysis showed greater than 100 white cells per high-power field. There is 3+ bacteria
Subject: last one! Urinalysis showed greater than 100 white cells per high-power field. There is 3+ bacteria
High powered sm
Subject: High powered sm
UA shows "a field tact" with white blood cells and red blood cells. What's he saying here?
Subject: UA shows "a field tact" with white blood cells and red blood cells. What's he saying here?
per high power field (nm)
Subject: per high power field (nm)
x
Per high power field (nm)
Subject: Per high power field (nm)
 .
high power field
Subject: high power field
All of my examples etc. have stated "high power field," but I really do not think it matters much.
high parg field??
Subject: high parg field??
doc is saying 4 to 10 red blood cells on a "high parg field" ?? any suggestions?
thanks in advance
SL high parg field
Subject: SL high parg field
doc dictates 4 to 10 red blood cells on a SL high parg field...any suggestions?
thanks in advance for any help
high-power field
Subject: high-power field
high-power field
Subject: high-power field
per high power field
Subject: per high power field
800 T-cells (T-helper), normal average 500-1500 cells
Subject: 800 T-cells (T-helper), normal average 500-1500 cells
/
positive sickle cells and s/l pardip? cells in the smear
Subject: positive sickle cells and s/l pardip? cells in the smear
LAB DATA: Sed rate 27, s/l aspirit 62,300 white cells, 100 red cells . . . . HELP?
Subject: LAB DATA: Sed rate 27, s/l aspirit 62,300 white cells, 100 red cells . . . . HELP?
A-cells/accelerations vs D-cells/decelerations
Subject: A-cells/accelerations vs D-cells/decelerations
This would be a Tesla scan - higher powered
Subject: This would be a Tesla scan - higher powered
MRI scan usually a 3 or 1.5.
r u new to the field? It's ALWAYS like this
Subject: r u new to the field? It's ALWAYS like this
I think with his name he should have went into a different field. LOL nm
Subject: I think with his name he should have went into a different field. LOL nm
How about T-cells?
Subject: How about T-cells?
??
LE cells ?? -- nm
Subject: LE cells ?? -- nm
x
I would put 8-10 red cells. nm
Subject: I would put 8-10 red cells. nm
.
T-cells
Subject: T-cells
"T-cells showed a WBC of 7,400, T-4 of 162, T-8 of 2,572." Is it correct to hyphenate between T and 4 or T and 8?
Cells per ml? (nm)
Subject: Cells per ml? (nm)
--
s/l A cells
Subject: s/l A cells
External monitor revealed 120 beats per minute with good variability with some s/l A cells.
full field WBC /nm
Subject: full field WBC /nm
.
got it - a field packed
Subject: got it - a field packed
Lord, perhaps another field would be more appropriate.
Subject: Lord, perhaps another field would be more appropriate.
field cups
Subject: field cups
"No field cups are noted on confrontation assessment?"
HEENT exam.
Anyone ever heard of?
field cuts
Subject: field cuts
x
full field nm
Subject: full field nm
wet-field cautery maybe?
Subject: wet-field cautery maybe?
could the first be "fractal field"? sm
Subject: could the first be "fractal field"? sm
more info would help...is this scan an ultrasound? second s/l ... "av"...what follows this?
Atypical cells
Subject: Atypical cells
"Atypical cells" are usually suspicious for carcinoma.
or Proliferative cells
Subject: or Proliferative cells
would make sense too.
palliative cells
Subject: palliative cells
Wasn't sure which board to put this on. I have 20-some years exp in onc, can usually Google to find new terms/meds etc, rarely have to leave blanks. One particular dictator (not a doc, a PA-C who is not only a mushmouth but also mispronounces everything) today stated that the pathology showed something-cells suspicious for carcinoma. It really sounded like he was saying "palliative" cells, but of course that doesn't make sense. I tried to make it into "palisading" cells but no, it definitely ended with "ive" not "ing" so I sent it to QA. I went back in the report later in the day and sure enough, QA had filled it in with "palliative" cells suspicious for carcinoma. What would you do? Please correct me if I'm wrong, but this doesn't make sense at all to me. Even though it did sound like "palliative" cells, I really think he meant something else but was mispronouncing it. Any input?
s/l Pac red blood cells.
Subject: s/l Pac red blood cells.
Postoperative bleeding requiring 2 units *pack* red blood cells for acute blood loss anemia.
Thanks!
or even PSA 1.4, cells benign...nm
Subject: or even PSA 1.4, cells benign...nm
nm
epithelial cells i believe.
Subject: epithelial cells i believe.
may be packed cells. nm
Subject: may be packed cells. nm
x
s/l agranazi air cells?
Subject: s/l agranazi air cells?
ENT surgeon says" I then used the image guidance to identify an "agranazi/nagranazi air cell".....
epithelial cells
Subject: epithelial cells
nm
|
