ProTack maybe? - nm
Posted By: twink on 2008-10-10
In Reply to: Very clearly stating Protec. (nm) - Backwards typist
Subject: ProTack maybe? - nm
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
There is ProTack.
Subject: There is ProTack.
x
ProTack.
Subject: ProTack.
x
It's a ProTack device, but when using 'protackers' think you need no
Subject: It's a ProTack device, but when using 'protackers' think you need no
s
ProTack as per my old Sted's GI/GU book. nm
Subject: ProTack as per my old Sted's GI/GU book. nm
And the ProTack device is by US Surgical in Connecticut. nm
Subject: And the ProTack device is by US Surgical in Connecticut. nm
s
Is the S sound clear? The ProTack device or ProTacker is used often. nm
Subject: Is the S sound clear? The ProTack device or ProTacker is used often. nm
s
|
