One way to verify findings on Google sm
Posted By: Dreamweaver on 2007-04-13
In Reply to: I too love Google but be V_E_R_Y careful w/google - sm
Subject: One way to verify findings on Google sm
If I am looking for a catheter, instrument, etc., if the little "R" registered trademark is used, usually it is correct, because they don't go to the trouble to put the trademark if they aren't being reasonable conscientious about spelling it right.
HOWEVER....sometimes I get multiple results with the "R" and they're different. In that case, I try to find the site for the company that manufactures the item. It is usually listed on the first page of Google results.
A lot of the more well-known drugs have their own sites - like www.coumadin.com.
Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old. To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
thx-but not able to verify in Google
Subject: thx-but not able to verify in Google
Yes, digoxin. To verify just type dig level into google. nm
Subject: Yes, digoxin. To verify just type dig level into google. nm
.
MRI findings
Subject: MRI findings
Patient is an adult female in a motor vehicle accident with skull fractures, epidural hematoma, subdural hematoma, and cerebral s/l *neurulation* on CT. Any ideas? Thanks!
x-ray findings help
Subject: x-ray findings help
Is there such a thing as N.C. IVF encroachment?
x-ray findings help
Subject: x-ray findings help
Thanks
x-ray findings help
Subject: x-ray findings help
NC-IVF = natural-cycle IVF encroachment
CT Findings
Subject: CT Findings
Upon review the CT of his chest does show negative pulmonary embolism however does show linear s/l alexisis of the lung bases and mild cardiomegaly.
TIA!
Echo Findings
Subject: Echo Findings
Can you hear coaptation of the cusps?
...findings as delineated above. (NM)
Subject: ...findings as delineated above. (NM)
paucity of findings
Subject: paucity of findings
Ortho MRI findings s/l sm
Subject: Ortho MRI findings s/l sm
Reviewed the patient's recent radiographic findings with her. These include MRI of the cervical spine. This does reveal some shallow disc herniation s/l "and indented sac" at C4-C5 and C6-C7 levels.
mammogram findings
Subject: mammogram findings
Is it BI-RADS or BIRADS?
Thanks is advance for your help!
PET scan findings
Subject: PET scan findings
s/l - no significant increase in glag-o-lytic activity in the left lower lobe mass. ???
TIA
Findings of a colonscopy:
Subject: Findings of a colonscopy:
The terminal ileum was s/l inabating and was normal.
it was said clearly, could not verify, TX
Subject: it was said clearly, could not verify, TX
x
Did the dictator list the findings? If so, we may be able to sm
Subject: Did the dictator list the findings? If so, we may be able to sm
put it all together.
He is probably describing the findings on an MRI scan SM
Subject: He is probably describing the findings on an MRI scan SM
If a patient has had spine surgery, the MRI is more than likely done with contrast. The contrast causes the MRI to "signal" when the contrast is bright in any area. That's what it means.
But the right colon is mentioned in findings. Can we have
Subject: But the right colon is mentioned in findings. Can we have
s
accessory clinical findings
Subject: accessory clinical findings
accessory, like jewelry:) flattering (clinical findings) to the diagnosis
sl tycycle findings noted
Subject: sl tycycle findings noted
Patient with NLP eye with mature cataract. Any ideas?
Thanks.
is this a procedure, test findings??
Subject: is this a procedure, test findings??
may I ask where you found it at because I cannot verify
Subject: may I ask where you found it at because I cannot verify
x
Is there a site to verify?
Subject: Is there a site to verify?
I had searched for that word as well. It's not in my Stedman's surgery or cardio book and couldn't find it online.
Please verify spelling sm
Subject: Please verify spelling sm
Furlow Z-plasty repair
Not sure how to write it correctly and can't find a reputable website to confirm.
Thx
Quote - cannot verify med
Subject: Quote - cannot verify med
"Prescriptions for Lyrica 50 mg and Kachar 20 mg" (he spells this)
Can anyone verify s/l AGD colonoscopy
Subject: Can anyone verify s/l AGD colonoscopy
thanks, just wanted to verify
Subject: thanks, just wanted to verify
nt
Lactonase..cannot verify this sm
Subject: Lactonase..cannot verify this sm
Patient takes Lactonase 2 tablets daily. Just need some clarification if this is right. Just in a list of meds.
It sounds like that might be it. Have you used that before? I just want to verify it.
Subject: It sounds like that might be it. Have you used that before? I just want to verify it.
med s/l ocella - cannot verify anywhere
Subject: med s/l ocella - cannot verify anywhere
Thanks!
Question on bone scan findings
Subject: Question on bone scan findings
The patient had a bone scan demonstrating findings suspicious for osseous metastases. "There was sclerosis seen involving the left acromion and left ilium. However, the skull findings [s/l equivocal as of normality?] and plain film appears to correspond to a sclerotic area involving the inner table." Does that make sense as is? I haven't heard that before.
...heart-related findings? Usually elevated after
Subject: ...heart-related findings? Usually elevated after
s
he says findings show a redudant sigmoid and
Subject: he says findings show a redudant sigmoid and
descending colon with approximately 150 mL of retained fluid from her prep suggesting a s/l slow transfer? constipation
thank you all for all of your help. I couldn't do this without you. You're the best!
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
Are there multiple problems--maybe a CONSTELLATION of findings
Subject: Are there multiple problems--maybe a CONSTELLATION of findings
|