Just so you know, the first part should say: Overall alignment is acceptable. Not sure about the s
Posted By: anon on 2008-09-21
In Reply to: ortho help - tiredMT
Subject: Just so you know, the first part should say: Overall alignment is acceptable. Not sure about the s/l nm
xx
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
- ortho help - tiredMT
- Just so you know, the first part should say: Overall alignment is acceptable. Not sure about the s - anon
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
maybe alignment and lucency?
Subject: maybe alignment and lucency?
could it be varus alignment?
Subject: could it be varus alignment?
nm
valgus alignment? (nm)
Subject: valgus alignment? (nm)
nm
? anatomic or anatomical alignment - nm
Subject: ? anatomic or anatomical alignment - nm
x
Yup, coronal alignment is correct. nm
Subject: Yup, coronal alignment is correct. nm
.
my message example is out of alignment as I used tabs. SM
Subject: my message example is out of alignment as I used tabs. SM
Tabs don't show up on messages. Anyway, depression and anxiety, for example, should be lined up with each diagnosis on the next line.
...for repair of an anterior crush alignment. nm
Subject: ...for repair of an anterior crush alignment. nm
s
I would just put a comma before "neutral alignment" and eliminate and/in
Subject: I would just put a comma before "neutral alignment" and eliminate and/in
I only found an alignment system not plain old align. nm
Subject: I only found an alignment system not plain old align. nm
.
right total knee posthesis s/l 'and camback' alignment sm
Subject: right total knee posthesis s/l 'and camback' alignment sm
X-rays reviewed that show maintenance of alignment and fixation, and progressive signs of healing sm
Subject: X-rays reviewed that show maintenance of alignment and fixation, and progressive signs of healing sm
now on three out of four s/l cordices. Thanks!
Is there more of the sentence? The 'que' part might be part of a dosage like q.12, etc. nm
Subject: Is there more of the sentence? The 'que' part might be part of a dosage like q.12, etc. nm
s
2-part, 3-part, or 4-part possibly - nm
Subject: 2-part, 3-part, or 4-part possibly - nm
Sorry, but either is acceptable
nm
either way is acceptable ....
Subject: either way is acceptable ....
AAMT prefers not making name possessive but a possessive form is acceptable if dictated or prefered by doctor. If it sounds better I would use 'S.
Yes, it is acceptable.
Subject: Yes, it is acceptable.
x
Both are acceptable and..
Subject: Both are acceptable and..
this account wants the "k". Thx
perhaps both are acceptable--sm
Subject: perhaps both are acceptable--sm
Caesarean section
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Caesarian section)
Jump to: navigation, search
A caesarean section (AE cesarean section), or c-section, is a form of childbirth in which a surgical incision is made through a mother's abdomen (laparotomy) and uterus (hysterotomy) to deliver one or more babies. It is usually performed when a vaginal delivery would put the baby's or mother's life at risk, although in the last decade it has been performed upon request.
q.a.c. is acceptable.....
Subject: q.a.c. is acceptable.....
acceptable
Subject: acceptable
I would think 3 in 1 or 3-in-1 are both acceptable
Subject: I would think 3 in 1 or 3-in-1 are both acceptable
Per BOS, this is acceptable but not
Subject: Per BOS, this is acceptable but not
preferred unless specifically indicated by the client. If not specified on account specifics, I would adhere to the BOS recommendations.
Either way is acceptable...
Subject: Either way is acceptable...
Use whatever your account prefers.
2+ is acceptable. nm
Subject: 2+ is acceptable. nm
x
Either one is acceptable
Subject: Either one is acceptable
Patella is referring to the kneecap and patellar simply means relating to the patella. I just use the one that sounds the best in context with the sentence.
are both acceptable?
Subject: are both acceptable?
I had QA send back a note changing paraesthesias to paresthesias. I thought both were acceptable. I have typed it with an 'a' for years. (like orthopedic versus orthopaedic) I have never had any doctor tell me he/she prefers it without the 'a.' Thanks.
Per my AAMT BOS, gm is acceptable, sm
Subject: Per my AAMT BOS, gm is acceptable, sm
but g is the referred method (no period), which is the way I type it, i.e. Valtrex 1 g
Of course, my BOS is not the newest version, so things could have changed.
I think both ways are acceptable, but I would not
Subject: I think both ways are acceptable, but I would not
Either do May 10 or May 10th, but do not assume this means the current year. My 2 cents, for what it is worth.. LOL 
Per BOS, subcu acceptable.
Subject: Per BOS, subcu acceptable.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
HbA1c is acceptable
Subject: HbA1c is acceptable
Substituting blood pressure with BP when it is dictated as "blood pressure" is not acceptable. That would be considered an error. Why would you use an acronym when it is not dictated as one? Every extra character helps.
So is HbA1c not acceptable if (sm)
Subject: So is HbA1c not acceptable if (sm)
dictator says "hemoglobin" instead of "Hb" in the report?
BOS II says either way acceptable. Ultimately, it's
Subject: BOS II says either way acceptable. Ultimately, it's
s
q.a.m. or every morning. q.a.m. is acceptable.
Subject: q.a.m. or every morning. q.a.m. is acceptable.
x
I think the acceptable/mostly used term is...sm
Subject: I think the acceptable/mostly used term is...sm
esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD).
With or w/o apostrophe is acceptable
Subject: With or w/o apostrophe is acceptable
ahem - in whose MT life is that acceptable?
Subject: ahem - in whose MT life is that acceptable?
no, not acceptable to type BID or qday.
Subject: no, not acceptable to type BID or qday.
Yep, acceptable, because your program doesn't know
Subject: Yep, acceptable, because your program doesn't know
s
Is abbreviation p.o. for orally still acceptable? SM
Subject: Is abbreviation p.o. for orally still acceptable? SM
I have been told by QA that it is not. TIA
re: Is abbreviation p.o. for orally still acceptable? SM
Subject: re: Is abbreviation p.o. for orally still acceptable? SM
Here's a link that tells all.
http://www.aamtonline.org/abbreviations.htm
Is orthopod an acceptable slang? nm
Subject: Is orthopod an acceptable slang? nm
is t.i.w. acceptable for three times weekly?sm
Subject: is t.i.w. acceptable for three times weekly?sm
I have never run across this before and it is a NP dictating - terrible :( and she is saying Zemplar 1.5 mcg "three times weekly" and SR interpreted it as t.i.w.
TIA
Also, pes anserine is acceptable. It is a bursa.
Subject: Also, pes anserine is acceptable. It is a bursa.
Is it acceptable to abbreviate it, as she does say quant.
Subject: Is it acceptable to abbreviate it, as she does say quant.
Isn't g an acceptable abbreviation for gram?
Subject: Isn't g an acceptable abbreviation for gram?
I had QA correct this:
MiraLax 7.5 g to be taken to MiraLax 7.5 grams to be taken .
If 7.5 g is wrong I've been doing it wrong for a long time. It's not on the forbidden abbreviation list in the BOS, so now I'm stumped.
Anyone have an opinion on this? Thanks!
Why is annular not acceptable? This is an annulus.
Subject: Why is annular not acceptable? This is an annulus.
It's a 'per the facility' issue as both are acceptable. Just use what QA says to keep them
Subject: It's a 'per the facility' issue as both are acceptable. Just use what QA says to keep them happy. nm
s
For clarity, trailer zeroes are acceptable in
Subject: For clarity, trailer zeroes are acceptable in
glasses have adds like
-2.00, +3.25, and it is required to use them to show how to dispense the prescription.
pelvicaliceal, pelvicalyceal (both are acceptable spellings)
Subject: pelvicaliceal, pelvicalyceal (both are acceptable spellings)
curet, curette - either/or? which is preferred and what is acceptable? nm
Subject: curet, curette - either/or? which is preferred and what is acceptable? nm
x
doc says fibroapical bullous disease. Is this acceptable?
Subject: doc says fibroapical bullous disease. Is this acceptable?
|
