It would be considered a lab.
Posted By: NM on 2009-06-25
In Reply to: fingerstick - mt
Subject: It would be considered a lab.
x
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
I considered that...but I don't think that is what he is saying.
Subject: I considered that...but I don't think that is what he is saying.
I also considered impregnation, but I think the word is something that begins with dos or dose, but I just can't quite grasp it.
You should use "was" as the 50 cc is a considered...sm
Subject: You should use "was" as the 50 cc is a considered...sm
a single unit.
Per BOS, IU is considered a "dangerous"
Subject: Per BOS, IU is considered a "dangerous"
abbreviation and should be written units.
q is considered a dangerous
Subject: q is considered a dangerous
abbreviation when standing alone. Unless client wants you to use it, replace with "every."
This is now considered to be a dangerous abbrev. Unless...sm
Subject: This is now considered to be a dangerous abbrev. Unless...sm
otherwise stated by the client, use at bedtime or at hour of sleep.
What is considered term pregnancy?
Subject: What is considered term pregnancy?
I have a dictator that said, "The child was born at term. Mom was 24 weeks' gestation." I always thought term was somewhere around 36+ weeks. He went on to say the birth weight was 6 pounds 13 ounces. Just from experience, I would think a 24-week gestation infant would not weigh that much.
Anyone in OB care to comment?
DC is considered a dangerous abbreviation
Subject: DC is considered a dangerous abbreviation
per BOS2 and should NOT be used. You use it in the context, not hard to determine if it means discontinue/d or discharge/d.
cc is considered a dangerous abbreviation
Subject: cc is considered a dangerous abbreviation
per BOS, however, if the facility/MTSO, etc. wishes to use cc they trump BOS.
Actually I had considered "adhesion" - but sent a draft - nm
Subject: Actually I had considered "adhesion" - but sent a draft - nm
cc is considered a "dangerous abbreviation"
Subject: cc is considered a "dangerous abbreviation"
x
i would think upper 7's without hearing it. anything 10 and under is considered anemic. nm
Subject: i would think upper 7's without hearing it. anything 10 and under is considered anemic. nm
`
where I work cc is considered a "dangerous" abbreviation.
Subject: where I work cc is considered a "dangerous" abbreviation.
We are required to use mL for that instead. It also satisfied HIPAA, JACHO, and all the other health-care alphabets. LOL
No, I actually considered promethazine, but I definitely here what sound like "tri." Thanks.
Subject: No, I actually considered promethazine, but I definitely here what sound like "tri." Thanks.
Are "bicarb" and "prep" considered slang? Do you
nm
Aspirin is considered generic, unless coupled with
Subject: Aspirin is considered generic, unless coupled with
brand name, like Bayer Aspirin.
Unless it is considered gravida 2, para 2, "live births" 2?
Subject: Unless it is considered gravida 2, para 2, "live births" 2?
a knee aspirate would be considered a procedure, at least from my experience.
Subject: a knee aspirate would be considered a procedure, at least from my experience.
It's considered an acceptable sloppy "docism" to use tendinitis now. Read something
Subject: It's considered an acceptable sloppy "docism" to use tendinitis now. Read something
s
I say "feels" because nursing is considered a single unit in this context. nm
Subject: I say "feels" because nursing is considered a single unit in this context. nm
x
|
