It might have been but I went ahead and put it through.
Posted By: mtlost on 2007-03-08
In Reply to: Onychomycosis and Lamisil? nm - clhmt
Subject: It might have been but I went ahead and put it through.
I've asked for feed back and hope I get it. thanks for your help.
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
TY - I got a little ahead of
Subject: TY - I got a little ahead of
it was not tpyed that way in the real doc. = )
I went ahead and flagged it even though
Subject: I went ahead and flagged it even though
he never again mentions the left tonsil. Even at the end of the dictation when he says the plan is to rule out a right peritonsillar abscess. Same thing he said in chief complaint, except there he said "left". Oh well....I flagged it and I'll let QA make the change.
Thanks for the advice.
That may be it, went ahead and flagged it though thank you
Subject: That may be it, went ahead and flagged it though thank you
x
I would go ahead and put Elder Abuse...
Subject: I would go ahead and put Elder Abuse...
a lot of states have this to report elderly people who are being abused by family, etc.
That's a possibility, but I'm not sure. I had to go ahead and send. Thanks!
Subject: That's a possibility, but I'm not sure. I had to go ahead and send. Thanks!
I went ahead and sent it with a blank. It was STAT. Thanks-
Subject: I went ahead and sent it with a blank. It was STAT. Thanks-
nm
and it isn't epidermidis....thanks anyway ahead of time :)
Subject: and it isn't epidermidis....thanks anyway ahead of time :)
and it isn't epidermidis....thanks anyway ahead of time :)
Subject: and it isn't epidermidis....thanks anyway ahead of time :)
Just go ahead and leave a blank. With
Subject: Just go ahead and leave a blank. With
foreign accents sometimes it is only a guess and not worth guessing wrong.
that's a Coumadin dosage, not INR, wonder if the doc is getting ahead...sm
Subject: that's a Coumadin dosage, not INR, wonder if the doc is getting ahead...sm
of himself about doing an INR level to make sure the Coumadin is therapeutic, not too much and not to little. The INR level should be between 2-3 for most labs. Sounds like he meant to say Coumadin, and may later on in the dictation talk about getting an INR level. Hope this helps!
yeah - I was thinking that myself, but I could never confirm it. I just went ahead and sent it to
Subject: yeah - I was thinking that myself, but I could never confirm it. I just went ahead and sent it to
QA, but thank you for your help.
Hehehe, I guess I was a step ahead of that
Subject: Hehehe, I guess I was a step ahead of that
I'm sorry, Since I already have suprascript and subscript up on my tool bar, my instructions were what to do for O(subscript)2 so all you have to do is type O2 (normal script) and it changes automatically. I don't like having to highlight the 2 and go up there and click the subscript button every time. I would rather type O2 and let Word change it for me. I try to get Word to do as much for me as possible. I do this for cm squared, cm cubed, H2(subscript)0, etc.
oops - fingers got ahead of me -- s/b "diseases"
Subject: oops - fingers got ahead of me -- s/b "diseases"
Does it sound like he is saying "constitutional" instead of correction ahead?
Subject: Does it sound like he is saying "constitutional" instead of correction ahead?
No I'm actually not rude...but go ahead and keep telling yourself that if it makes you feel bette
Subject: No I'm actually not rude...but go ahead and keep telling yourself that if it makes you feel better.
Why don't you go read through your posts, they don't sound very friendly to me.
Neuroforaminal versus neural foraminal (warning: rant ahead)
Subject: Neuroforaminal versus neural foraminal (warning: rant ahead)
I know this has been discussed before, but I have never typed anything except "neural foraminal," and when I first started with this particular account, all the templates had "neural foraminal stenosis" as one of the headings on the spine CTs and MRIs.
Now the "billing and coding specialist" who is in charge of the account (and who is obviously not a trained transcriptionist - she typed "flebolith" on one report I saw), has changed all the templates to "neuroforaminal," and when I just changed them back, she sent me a nasty little note saying "Don't change the templates."
Well, you should have seen the sorry state the templates were in when I started here. I have spent hours of my OWN time (I am paid by the line) not only cleaning up the templates but also standardizing the naming of the templates so that they can be found easily using the wild card notation.
I am tempted to send an email back saying, "Okay, I'll leave them that way, but 'neuroforaminal' is incorrect" but I am leaving this account as soon as they have my replacement trained.
In fact, I just sent it. I'm leaving, got nothing to lose, and actually have more work than I can comfortably handle right now. I really wish she would tell me she didn't need me any more. 
Oh, I just got her reply: "Actually, no it is not [incorrect]. That is how it was always spelled before we hired ____________ [MTSO] and that is how all of the rads wanted it spelled."
So be it.
|
