Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

It is binging or bingeing, both ways in Merriam-Webster dictionary.

Posted By: pc on 2009-06-10
In Reply to: Thanks, that's what I thought! - shortcake

Subject: It is binging or bingeing, both ways in Merriam-Webster dictionary.




Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

Help! Is it binging or bingeing on alcohol? Thanx
Subject: Help! Is it binging or bingeing on alcohol? Thanx

..
Link for Merriam-Webster's
Subject: Link for Merriam-Webster's

Here's the link for Merriam-Webster's:

http://www.m-w.com/

The Online Dictionary is free for now.

Typing "wretching" would have taken you to the correct word, "retching." Unfortunately, with all dictionaries, you need to know the basic word to look up the spelling.

Good luck!
Thank you for the appreciation, decubiti is plural according to Merriam-Webster
Subject: Thank you for the appreciation, decubiti is plural according to Merriam-Webster


laid down. Layed is not a word in Merriam-Webster.
Subject: laid down. Layed is not a word in Merriam-Webster.


Per Dorland's, Sloane, Merriam-Webster all neurapraxia; no neuropraxia found.
Subject: Per Dorland's, Sloane, Merriam-Webster all neurapraxia; no neuropraxia found.


Don't forget Webster's dictionary--sm
Subject: Don't forget Webster's dictionary--sm

you usually don't think to find "medical" words in Webster's but found the following--
Main Entry: in to·to
Pronunciation: in-'tO-(")tO
Function: adverb
Etymology: Latin, on the whole
: TOTALLY, ENTIRELY
not OP but in Webster's Dictionary since 1980
Subject: not OP but in Webster's Dictionary since 1980

In Webster's Dictionary since 1980 (as I know it and have one here), they have been putting non and re together with whatever comes after it....


nonexistent and reexcision for example.....


et cetera........


and so there should be no hyphen medically either but YOU ARE SO RIGHT, depends on who you work for #1, Client profile #2....and all QA personnel because some mark you correct and some mark you incorrect when you don't use a hyphen or use a hyphen in these cases.


 


I use long-standing per my Webster's dictionary. NM
x
it's two words, your mtso is incorrect. Buy a Webster's dictionary
Subject: it's two words, your mtso is incorrect. Buy a Webster's dictionary

:
bingeing
Subject: bingeing


symptomology is in Merriam-Websters, unless you'd rather
Subject: symptomology is in Merriam-Websters, unless you'd rather

s
onelook.com and the Merriam's dict. agree with you, too! :) nm
Subject: onelook.com and the Merriam's dict. agree with you, too! :) nm

s
Check your Webster's??? nm
Subject: Check your Webster's??? nm

nm
It may be a word in Webster's but
Subject: It may be a word in Webster's but

the BOS states we should use pus-like as 'pussy' (cringe) has more than 1 meaning. Pus-like sounds more professional.


Webster's says pleural form is ...
Subject: Webster's says pleural form is ...

apparatuses or apparatus.  Have never seen a doc that didn't try to make up his own form of word from time to time either though...so if your account states strictly verbatim without the ability to correct grammar even when you know it's incorrect then I would type what he says.


Check Webster's Universal - it's in there
Subject: Check Webster's Universal - it's in there

:
My Webster's has it as a word, see link
Subject: My Webster's has it as a word, see link

for definition from googling, I hear it dictated quite often too
The plural is ductus per Webster's
Subject: The plural is ductus per Webster's


Dorland's, Stedman's, Webster's--take your pick.
Subject: Dorland's, Stedman's, Webster's--take your pick.

x
no problem. if all else fails with stedman, grab webster
Subject: no problem. if all else fails with stedman, grab webster

/
corticated is listed in Webster's Universal as an adjective. So, yes, it is a legitimate word.
Subject: corticated is listed in Webster's Universal as an adjective. So, yes, it is a legitimate word. nm

?


2 ways
Subject: 2 ways

1. Go to INSERT, AUTOTEXT (Or ALT, I, A. In autotext you can type “-year-old” and hit okay. For this side you will actually have to type at least 4 letters (i.e. –yea) and the rest of the phrase will pop up and then you hit enter.
2. Or, the one you are hunting is to INSERT and AUTOCORRECT at the top left tab. Go to middle of screen “replace” and “with”. Type ":yo" and then tab over to the With side and type "-year-old". And then enter or "ok". Make sure it is a colon not semicolon.

HCG or hCG?? i have seen both ways.
Subject: HCG or hCG?? i have seen both ways.


Two different ways, so which one is
Subject: Two different ways, so which one is

correct?? and google has it with the hypen.
Yes, both ways!
Subject: Yes, both ways!

Stedman's Orthopaedic & Rehab Words has it listed both ways, bur hole and burr hole.
I have seen it both ways......nm
Subject: I have seen it both ways......nm

nm
I put both ways into google and both
Subject: I put both ways into google and both

were used, but in different contexts. It depends on how it is used and what the intent is. After reading both, reflection, in this case, would probably be the more correct word. Sorry.
Have see it in dictation both ways.nm
Subject: Have see it in dictation both ways.nm


S/L general ways
Subject: S/L general ways

Patient is ready to be admitted for outpatient surgery tomorrow for right hemicolectomy.  When awakened this morning he felt this sharp pain in his right upper quadrant, started having some nausea *** to upper fever of way over 102.  (after nausea is sounds like he says general ways to upper fever..."can that be right)?  thanks
3 ways in Stedman's
Subject: 3 ways in Stedman's

CAM Walker
Cam Walker
Cam walker

I personally go with CAM (controlled ankle motion) Walker.
I've seen it both ways, but I have
Subject: I've seen it both ways, but I have

typed it as gastrocsoleus as well for many, many years....  in case it matters....
I think both ways are acceptable, but I would not
Subject: I think both ways are acceptable, but I would not

Either do May 10 or May 10th, but do not assume this means the current year.  My 2 cents, for what it is worth..  LOL 
And yet again 3 very simple ways...
Subject: And yet again 3 very simple ways...

ALT L with start numbered list lining them up and ALT L will shut it off.

Or start typing without the numbers, returning as needed and then block listings and ALT L.

Or, type 1, tab and type and when you return for #1 it will give you the number. If it indents, back up to the beginning of one of #1 sentences and SHIFT TAB to move it back the margin.

Just found both ways 6 and VI
Subject: Just found both ways 6 and VI

so totally confused. Any help??? Please. Thanks
Thanks. Google has it both ways
Subject: Thanks. Google has it both ways

I was going with white-white anyway. Thanks for your help.
There are several correct ways
Subject: There are several correct ways

I agree with using periods instead of semicolons to declutter the whole thing.
In the 2nd sentence I would put the comma before "and" as a complete sentence follows = ....during the day, and subsequently,.... In the final sentence = Therefore, one dose of Brethine was administered, and Stadol was given and subsequently it subsided. According to the BOS, you may join closely related sentences without commas. That is why I left out the commas in the final sentence. If you use too many commas, it becomes cluttered.
Well, now I see they have it listed both ways?
Subject: Well, now I see they have it listed both ways?

x
Ok, could be. I have seen it both ways. I had looked this up before on..
Subject: Ok, could be. I have seen it both ways. I had looked this up before on..

the Mayo Clinic website.  Here's where it was.


http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/signs-of-labor/PR00083



Thanks! I've seen it both ways too!
Subject: Thanks! I've seen it both ways too!


Seen it spelled both ways...
Subject: Seen it spelled both ways...

???
If you google it, you see it both ways.
Subject: If you google it, you see it both ways.

x
I think there are a few "correct" ways of doing it
Subject: I think there are a few "correct" ways of doing it

I work for oncologists, and they prefer HER2/neu


Stedman's Oncology Word Book has HER-2/neu


Vera Pyle Silver book has HER-2-neu


The only one I would not use that is mentioned is her2nu??


 


4 correct ways in stedmans...
Subject: 4 correct ways in stedmans...

i've used the lower case p, but that's not in stedmans:
PCO(subscript 2)
PCO2
P(co2 subscript)
Pco2
I have seen it both ways, but I prefer gray. SM
Subject: I have seen it both ways, but I prefer gray. SM

BTW, when I worked in house that happened to me also, I had to train 2 people. I quit.
Una or Unna boot? I have seen it both ways..
Subject: Una or Unna boot? I have seen it both ways..

I need to know which way is correct, or if both are acceptable(since I have seen both used online)- una boot or unna boot?? Thanks in advance!!
I found it both ways on google. nm
Subject: I found it both ways on google. nm


Stedman's 3rd abbreviations has it both ways.
Subject: Stedman's 3rd abbreviations has it both ways.

nm
I have heard it dictated both ways sm

I have always, always typed HEENT, no matter what, and it was changed to HENT.  Now, I am paranoid that I am missing something - are the ears and eyes sharing one E now?  ARRRGH!


I'm suggesting the 2 ways I might be hearing it, thx
Subject: I'm suggesting the 2 ways I might be hearing it, thx


there may be 2 correct ways, see inside
Subject: there may be 2 correct ways, see inside

I use www.clinicaltrials.gov or www.nih.gov for harder spellings, also some other good sites out there . . I do a hematology clinic regularly, and the anti-Xa is what they require.
I checked it up so many ways and could not find it. Thank you so much!!!
Subject: I checked it up so many ways and could not find it. Thank you so much!!!