It's apparent they have had NO training whatsoever. sm
Posted By: USAMT on 2006-05-29
In Reply to: I so believe that!!!! one can tell....sm - r u testing by any chance?
Subject: It's apparent they have had NO training whatsoever. sm
I find this very alarming. It's gotten quite obvious the offshore people are putting any person with a BP and pulse behind a computer and saying "transcribe."
This is a huge problem. I feel kind of sorry for these offshore "MTs" but not that much. They really must be struggling. It's tough for all MTs to learn, but we in the USA at least have had some proper training.
Imagine not knowing "sound alike" for "tourniquet!" Unbelievable!!!
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
I do not hear sestamibi whatsoever and he does not say stress anywhere.
Subject: I do not hear sestamibi whatsoever and he does not say stress anywhere.
not apparent...
Subject: not apparent...
she actually almost separates the words pan opacification...i just couldn't confirm it on a reliable website as one word
1 or 2 (I was told this during training)
Subject: 1 or 2 (I was told this during training)
I was told when I was training at one point WITH MedQuist (when I was still on full QA) to use the numbers 1 and 2 and not the Roman numerals. I hope that helps. It might very well be a matter of preference for the account you are working on, but I believe the numbers 1 and 2 are correct.
apparent impingement?
Subject: apparent impingement?
xx
s/l "ANG training"
Subject: s/l "ANG training"
This patient is going to "ANG training" to become a nurse anesthetist. Anyone heard of this type of training?
Thanks,
Abby
"was" by my training and references...sm
Subject: "was" by my training and references...sm
all amounts are to be transcribed as singular when abbreviated, so it does not matter if "approximately" is used it is always 10 cc of fluid was aspirated (and/or injected).
Obviously if it is dictated "a total of 10 cc..." it is WAS because "total" is the subject. Also, even if the dictation was "10 cc of fluidS..." it would still be was because the unit of measurement is the subject of the sentence and is abbreviated.
incipient (beginning to become apparent etc) ? nm
Subject: incipient (beginning to become apparent etc) ? nm
S/L-Atyptic pleasant female in no apparent distress.
Subject: S/L-Atyptic pleasant female in no apparent distress.
distal exam was then performed, s/l medial apparent?
Subject: distal exam was then performed, s/l medial apparent?
could be "Air National Guard" CRNA training... nm
Subject: could be "Air National Guard" CRNA training... nm
Gait training, strengthening, endurance and "over round"?
Subject: Gait training, strengthening, endurance and "over round"?
hover round, over round, help around??
|
