I was wrong - apparently the FDA recognizes it...
Posted By: SM on 2007-11-28
In Reply to: I have only known lactulose....but I could be wrong - NM
Subject: I was wrong - apparently the FDA recognizes it...
http://fda-drugs.legalview.com/legal-issue/laxilose
I just have never heard them dictate that ever....decades
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
You are correct, doc either gave wrong dosage or wrong drug, would "flag" this for your QA dep
Subject: You are correct, doc either gave wrong dosage or wrong drug, would "flag" this for your QA dept if you have one.
Was this in wrong spot before? We had a slew of responses, all wrong! nm
Subject: Was this in wrong spot before? We had a slew of responses, all wrong! nm
s
Having a bad day apparently LOL - Thanks!
Subject: Having a bad day apparently LOL - Thanks!
s/l LV hypertrophy, "dopplofeech" is consistent with moderate diastolic disfunction
Apparently?
Subject: Apparently?
nm
could it be apparently?
Subject: could it be apparently?
xx
Apparently
Subject: Apparently
that is a phenomenon from sitting/lying too long. Morning stiffness or morning gel. :-)
Apparently...
Subject: Apparently...
bimelic is 2 limbs, monomelic only 1 limb, tetramelic would be all 4 limbs. :-)
LOL! Apparently so! And it's very scary.
Subject: LOL! Apparently so! And it's very scary.
x
sorry - apparently I'm not awake yet! (nm)
Subject: sorry - apparently I'm not awake yet! (nm)
x
Per FreeDictionary.com apparently both
Subject: Per FreeDictionary.com apparently both
go-round (ground)
n.
An argument; a go-around.
Apparently there are no possessives
Subject: Apparently there are no possessives
Either in signs or diagnoses. Thanks!
apparently patients sometimes refer to it as H1c. sm
Subject: apparently patients sometimes refer to it as H1c. sm
Try googling H1c, lots of hits from (apparently) patients. Also, wondered if slurring could make "an A1c" sound like your HUNC ? Also found at least one reference to histoplasmosis marker of H1C.
found it! apparently it was pouchoscopy... =) nm
Subject: found it! apparently it was pouchoscopy... =) nm
x
I appreciate it. I apparently didn't try enough spellings!
Subject: I appreciate it. I apparently didn't try enough spellings!
Apparently during this test it is just transcribed as J-sign;
Subject: Apparently during this test it is just transcribed as J-sign;
UNDER ORTHO TESTING: Observe patellar tracking (J-sign), palpate for crepitus with knee extension.
Yep, and you can apparently fracture a sinus... go figure
Subject: Yep, and you can apparently fracture a sinus... go figure
Found it - apparently they're interchangable.
Subject: Found it - apparently they're interchangable.
Thanks!!! The FNP keeps spelling it Ascenda. Apparently, she doesn't know her meds..LOL
Subject: Thanks!!! The FNP keeps spelling it Ascenda. Apparently, she doesn't know her meds..LOL
Yep, apparently for shoulder surgery, captain's chair
Subject: Yep, apparently for shoulder surgery, captain's chair
Apparently part of patient's history, but not clear...
Subject: Apparently part of patient's history, but not clear...
MRI is reviewed confirming the presence of a full-thickness supraspinatus tendon tear with early glenohumeral arthritis. The patient apparently had a long head biceps tendon operation as well, perhaps s/l an or in acoa.
The patient has another orthopaedic surgeon in New York that has done a shoulder procedure (he says this in the HPI) and I can't tell if he's saying "an" or "in" acoa.
Thanks MT50.
Apparently it is an incision that is relatively short, for example, between seven and thirteen centi
Subject: Apparently it is an incision that is relatively short, for example, between seven and thirteen centimeters.
Apparently nasal wash specimens are done for linfluenza.
Subject: Apparently nasal wash specimens are done for linfluenza.
There is a machine apparently called Bragg x-ray (I am probably reaching on this one). Sorry.
Subject: There is a machine apparently called Bragg x-ray (I am probably reaching on this one). Sorry.
You're welcome. Apparently it's watched as a precursor to cancer
Subject: You're welcome. Apparently it's watched as a precursor to cancer
Apparently, charley-horse CAN include bruise, etc.
Subject: Apparently, charley-horse CAN include bruise, etc.
Again, give it a shot with Google. :)
Apparently this person probably gets UTIs after sex, so they put her on Macrobid to fight the infect
Subject: Apparently this person probably gets UTIs after sex, so they put her on Macrobid to fight the infections postcoitally
Apparently blephar(o) is pertaining to the eyelids, the actual eyelid is palpebra
Subject: Apparently blephar(o) is pertaining to the eyelids, the actual eyelid is palpebra
Apparently, the "flame sign" may be present, due to disruption and depression of the lateral c
Subject: Apparently, the "flame sign" may be present, due to disruption and depression of the lateral canthal tendon (according to Emedicine)
Apparently also with stroke testing..."Alterations in reaching after stroke and their relation to
Subject: Apparently also with stroke testing..."Alterations in reaching after stroke and their relation to movement direction and impairment severity latitude and longitude; footing, standing, standpoint, post; stage..."
Wait...! apparently my post did not post
Subject: Wait...! apparently my post did not post
I would do 60%. I have several doctors that will say 60 (as in ) 6-0. Clarifying the numbers so you don't put 16. They do 50, 5-0 so you don't put 15 because they sound close. It just sounds like sixty-six-zero. Put what you feel is right but I would be from experienc it is 60%
this one is right; ones below are wrong. nm
Subject: this one is right; ones below are wrong. nm
;
perhaps I was wrong
Subject: perhaps I was wrong
Milton, no ulterior motive here. I'm also not a cynic, so perhaps it's best I just graciously back away from this board. You've already answered my question. This is not a board for the likes of executives. The information flying around is inaccurate, and that's the way it will remain. Since most people are smart enough to go to the source when seeking verifiable info, I'll trust the general population to be sensible enough to contact the source if and when in doubt about what they're reading. Sorry to have disturbed you.
they want, EVEN IF THEY ARE WRONG!!! *L*..nm
Subject: they want, EVEN IF THEY ARE WRONG!!! *L*..nm
xx
it wrong, cause 99% it usually is!!!....LOL...nm
Subject: it wrong, cause 99% it usually is!!!....LOL...nm
.
but I could be wrong......*L*......nm
Subject: but I could be wrong......*L*......nm
x
Don't know about that...and I could be way wrong....
Subject: Don't know about that...and I could be way wrong....
but isn't there also an Orthofix screw?
Do you know what's wrong with
Subject: Do you know what's wrong with
the patient?
no, that's the wrong end...thank you though..nm
Subject: no, that's the wrong end...thank you though..nm
nm
You are right, I am wrong - Sorry OP! (nm)
Subject: You are right, I am wrong - Sorry OP! (nm)
zzz
YES! Thanks! I think she just saying it wrong.
Subject: YES! Thanks! I think she just saying it wrong.
THANKS!!!!
YOUR WRONG!
Subject: YOUR WRONG!
I USE THIS SITE EVERY ONCE IN A WHILE, AND I DO HAVE A FULL LINE OF REFERENCE MATERIAL.
THANKS AARON, YOU DID MAKE ME FEEL BETTER!
she's right, I was wrong (above)....sm
Subject: she's right, I was wrong (above)....sm
it's med-evac, nn is 100% right on this!!! ..........dang - I've been typing it wrong for YEARS....thanks for the heads up....nn......*S* It's what I love most about MT'g - ya do learn new stuff daily!!!!
no I was wrong, it's not pt name...sm
Subject: no I was wrong, it's not pt name...sm
I mis-read the OP...it is evidently some type of test that I, myself, am not familiar with.
I know what's wrong
Subject: I know what's wrong
You're using the quotation marks at the end, which means Google is searching for that exact phrase. Take the quotation marks out, and you'll get it.
I may be wrong, but
Subject: I may be wrong, but
Since the definition of hydrosalpinx is "The accumulation of serous fluid in the fallopian tube" I would say that is a condition and not something that can be made into a plural. You wouldn't say "He has gouts", you would say "He has gout in both feet".
So, I'd say something like "There was hydrosalpinx in both fallopian tubes" when he tries to make it plural.
That's my take on it, anyway.
and you'd be wrong again - SM
Subject: and you'd be wrong again - SM
here's your free education in net etiquette
http://www.tailfeathersnetwork.com/netiquette.php
Typing in all caps is considered shouting. Who wants to read a post where the person screams at you the entire time? The majority of users simply ignore those posts, and any valuable information is lost. Please do NOT use all caps, you will only be perceived as ignorant, inconsiderate, and lazy.
BOS is wrong
Subject: BOS is wrong
Assessments need to be without abbreviations (unless the abbreviation is so obscure that you and no one else knows it). If not, when they are audited it will hit the fan. Remember all the middlemen who are going to read and make decisions about reimbursement, etc. based on the report. Some of them are $8.00 an hour employees and are making decisions regarding OUR health care and the treatments/procedures our doctors have decided upon. Does that scare you too?
IT IS WRONG BECAUSE
Subject: IT IS WRONG BECAUSE
b.i.d. and t.i.d. etc. are abbreviations from latin words. Week or weekly is definitely not latin. Type it out as "weekly"
might help if we know what is wrong with
Subject: might help if we know what is wrong with
x
I could be wrong, but...
Subject: I could be wrong, but...
I always use follow-up with a dash as an adjective ("follow-up appointment, follow-up call") and follow up with space & no dash as a verb ("...will follow up in 7 to 10 days"). I do not use 'followup'. I think this is correct,  but maybe someone could enlighten me?
Don't get me wrong
Subject: Don't get me wrong
I would never have guessed. My question basically was, could it have been 205 because it sounded so high. I personally have never transcribed a blood pressure that high, and then the doc was not admitting them. That is where my confusion was. Thanks guys for your replies
|
