I re-read the initial post
Posted By: ER-MT on 2006-11-06
In Reply to: And now the definition for seton. - Me
Subject: I re-read the initial post
I misunderstood the original question, so you are probably right.
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
Sorry. Just read your post over and
Subject: Sorry. Just read your post over and
realized you were correcting yourself after what you had found on the internet.
Scary that the internet is giving wrong info too, and a lot of people go by what is on there without double checking.
Again Sorry.
Read the post!
Subject: Read the post!
xx
Now that I read your post
Subject: Now that I read your post
I'm sure in the feet it would be peripheral vascular disease.
Didn't you read my post?
Subject: Didn't you read my post?
Yes, my Stedman's and several other books spell it Kitner. And several other perfectly reputable sources spell it Kittner.
WHICH IS WHY I ASKED 'PLEASE DON'T JUST TELL ME HOW YOUR BOOK SPELLS IT!'
Please, does anyone actually have credible reference as to the person who these tools are named after?
Thank you.
THANK YOU! I saw I had typed that and not at when I read my post nm
Subject: THANK YOU! I saw I had typed that and not at when I read my post nm
my bad.
sorry, did nto read inside your post. NM
Subject: sorry, did nto read inside your post. NM
x
oh, now I'm confused...just read your post again...
Subject: oh, now I'm confused...just read your post again...
I think I'll have to research that.
post malfunctioned...should read " 0 Ti-Cron " nm
Subject: post malfunctioned...should read " 0 Ti-Cron " nm
see message, sorry so late, just read your post
Subject: see message, sorry so late, just read your post
in·a·ni·tion Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[in-uh-nish-uhn] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun 1. exhaustion from lack of nourishment; starvation.
2. lack of vigor; lethargy.
whoops, sorry didn't read your other post....nm
Subject: whoops, sorry didn't read your other post....nm
read her explaining post below charlie
Subject: read her explaining post below charlie
nm
Oops - didn't read your whole post, guess not! nm
Subject: Oops - didn't read your whole post, guess not! nm
x
Thanks. I figured that out after I re-read your post and the differences between the two. Glad you
Subject: Thanks. I figured that out after I re-read your post and the differences between the two. Glad you got it right.
whoops! I didn't read the whole post...not cervicalgia....nm
Subject: whoops! I didn't read the whole post...not cervicalgia....nm
xx
"Didn't you read my post?" and screaming at someone in all caps is RUDE. It's not
Subject: "Didn't you read my post?" and screaming at someone in all caps is RUDE. It's not
excused by please and thank you. And I did have something to offer. I offered that since you can document it either way, either should be correct. FWIW, I googled for (Kitner, Kittner) blunt manufacturer and came up with nada. There is no "credible" reference that's better than what you've got, evidently.
Sorry! Brain MRI = periventricular capping. Read your post too fast. nm.
Subject: Sorry! Brain MRI = periventricular capping. Read your post too fast. nm.
x
I think it may be just initial cap
Subject: I think it may be just initial cap
I'd use it. Just another way of saying first or initial, so this must be a repeat. nm
Subject: I'd use it. Just another way of saying first or initial, so this must be a repeat. nm
s
an initial procedure? Just a WAG. nm
Subject: an initial procedure? Just a WAG. nm
got it - - initial presentation
Subject: got it - - initial presentation
No initial cap for fentanyl. nm
Subject: No initial cap for fentanyl. nm
nm
After I posted the initial question...
Subject: After I posted the initial question...
Doc mentions later and says, "I think it's x-a-n-o-x-l"
Anyone heard of xanoxl?
heparin and it is not initial capped either...
Subject: heparin and it is not initial capped either...
WAG, "over initial doses"
Subject: WAG, "over initial doses"
numeric and nylon is not capped initial.....nm
Subject: numeric and nylon is not capped initial.....nm
Her cervix on initial exam was 0 in 50% effaced.
Subject: Her cervix on initial exam was 0 in 50% effaced.
Is this the proper way to transcribe this- 0 in 50%? It looks akward.
AAMT BOS prefers us to just initial caps these terms, sm
Subject: AAMT BOS prefers us to just initial caps these terms, sm
so they don't stand out in a report. You'll see many trademarked names in all caps.
I think it is "index" and he means it as the initial procedure since she had follow up procedu
Subject: I think it is "index" and he means it as the initial procedure since she had follow up procedures that included lenthening and so on. Does that make sense?
overread vs over-read vs over read
Subject: overread vs over-read vs over read
OneLook has a disclaimer for the definition of the word overread that says: This definition is from the 1913 Webster's Dictionary and may be outdated. Some of the links listed on OneLook give the definition, some say the word does not exist, another gives the definition and then says (not used). There are references online for over-read, overread, and over read. I think over-read with a hyphen is a nice compromise. It's situations like this that make me dazed and confused!
Thought it had more to do with her sources of information on the patient prior to initial visit. nm
Subject: Thought it had more to do with her sources of information on the patient prior to initial visit. nm
x
"The loop memory of each lens is expressed as the difference between the initial overall diameter
Subject: "The loop memory of each lens is expressed as the difference between the initial overall diameter measurement (pretest) and the measurement at each time point; the lower the value, the higher the memory. " Per the Cataract Institute
On a similar note, I copied and pasted a URL/Link & sent with my post, but it was absent from post.
Subject: On a similar note, I copied and pasted a URL/Link & sent with my post, but it was absent from post.
x
ADMIN, can you post a perm msg to post LOTS of context when asking about WORDS?
Subject: ADMIN, can you post a perm msg to post LOTS of context when asking about WORDS?
thanks
OP's post inside post says not Harrington rods
Subject: OP's post inside post says not Harrington rods
x
Wait...! apparently my post did not post
Subject: Wait...! apparently my post did not post
I would do 60%. I have several doctors that will say 60 (as in ) 6-0. Clarifying the numbers so you don't put 16. They do 50, 5-0 so you don't put 15 because they sound close. It just sounds like sixty-six-zero. Put what you feel is right but I would be from experienc it is 60%
Either initial caps or camel caps are fine, just be consistent.
Subject: Either initial caps or camel caps are fine, just be consistent.
Actually it is not - please read
Subject: Actually it is not - please read
http://www.urocit-k.com/index.jsp
Yes, she is a QA. Just re-read above
Subject: Yes, she is a QA. Just re-read above
posts.
I will correct myself before someone else does, THERE is too much guessing....
I read it!
Subject: I read it!
EVERYONE READ
Subject: EVERYONE READ - REVISED
This Word board is for assistance.
If you don't want to assist or be helpful with information, direction, guidance, then simply do not post.
Stop with the rudeness, the hatefulness, the judgement.
If you want to report a suspicious post for test questions or offshore MT, etc., please do so but stop being ugly ON the board.
Goldbird
Did you even read
Subject: Did you even read
.
pls read
Subject: pls read
Is Fosamax given weekly or daily? I left a QA marker because when I look up Fosamax, it is given weekly, but the doc said 70 mg daily, so I left a blank. The QA person left it as daily. Would this be correct - Fosamax 70 mg daily?
Please read.
Subject: Please read.
sentence: Will inject his bursa and give him some 'compound and shock strips'. Anybody know what this might be?
Nevermind, it is read, sorry ;(
Subject: Nevermind, it is read, sorry ;(
d
They go by so fast you can't read then anyway. nm
Subject: They go by so fast you can't read then anyway. nm
2
I never have time to read them, either. nm
Subject: I never have time to read them, either. nm
:)
WORD HELP>>please read further
Subject: WORD HELP>>please read further
Physical Exam: There is no costovertebral angle tenderness. There is no tenderness noted s/l "lums" left upper quadrant of the abdomen, nor tenderness, s/l "lulls" or ribs in that left side. Thanks
Read the TOS for the board
Subject: Read the TOS for the board
It states that this board is not designed to be a place to get unlimited advice. It is here to foster dicussion. My opinion is people tend to use this site as a crutch because they lack maturity or motivation or just don't care to experience the pleasaure of researching and making discoveries that will benefit them for life.
ALL POSTERS READ
Subject: ALL POSTERS READ
I have deleted and banned several offshore posters from using this website, the Word board in particular. I will try to watch closely for offshore posters as we do not allow them to post here. Your help is appreciated if you suspect such.
Reminder: We do not allow test questions to be posted. As I am observing this board closely, I will delete any posts that seem to be following test format. Changing your moniker will not make a difference -- I can still see who you are!
Goldbird
Yes; however, there is no guarantee anyone will read it! Will do. (NM)
Subject: Yes; however, there is no guarantee anyone will read it! Will do. (NM)
Goldbird
I agree...if you had read the op...sm
Subject: I agree...if you had read the op...sm
you would have realized it was not criticism about not spelling something right, but about putting in a S/L question and someone not reading it correctly and saying she was not a mind reader. It was rude and uncalled for. Constructive criticism can be posted in a nice way, where it does not feel like criticism to the poster. No one has to be rude to get a point across. just my opinion.
|
