Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

I did that and listened at least 10 times. He really is saying "depential".

Posted By: MSMT on 2009-02-26
In Reply to: Check to see if the platform you are using - sm

Subject: I did that and listened at least 10 times. He really is saying "depential".




Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

:) I listened to this 100 times and kept not hearing BMI. Now it is right there. :) Thx.
Subject: :) I listened to this 100 times and kept not hearing BMI. Now it is right there. :) Thx.


listened two or three more times, that isn't it either.. will have to blank it..
Subject: listened two or three more times, that isn't it either.. will have to blank it..

thanks again~
No def says Coumadin!! I have listened too many times LOL WHY ON FRIDAY!!!!
Subject: No def says Coumadin!! I have listened too many times LOL WHY ON FRIDAY!!!!

I THINK I SHOULD FLAG!
yeah, I've listened 3 times -not that
Subject: yeah, I've listened 3 times -not that

guess time to flag  Thanks!
Maybe en' u prem. I've listened so many times I can make him say anything!
Subject: Maybe en' u prem. I've listened so many times I can make him say anything!


anon, listened several times, he says axial imageses. Thank you
Subject: anon, listened several times, he says axial imageses. Thank you


That's what I thought too, but it is so clearly pronounced as "depential".
Subject: That's what I thought too, but it is so clearly pronounced as "depential".


he clearly says "depential differential" but I can't verify that word
Subject: he clearly says "depential differential" but I can't verify that word


I have talked to the patient about the "depential" differential considerations.
Subject: I have talked to the patient about the "depential" differential considerations.


MD states under Plan: All EKS were fast at six seconds times 2 to 3 times? HELP
Subject: MD states under Plan: All EKS were fast at six seconds times 2 to 3 times? HELP


...or two times or 2 times. Get some specs from QA. nm
Subject: ...or two times or 2 times. Get some specs from QA. nm

s
I listened again and...
Subject: I listened again and...

She was probably saying AND butazolidin instead of "em" or "am".  Thank you!
Listened to it again and that is it! Thank you!!
Subject: Listened to it again and that is it! Thank you!!


listened again...
Subject: listened again...

I definitely hear an "s" in the middle and a "tide or dide" at the end. Thanks for the suggestions.
I listened again
Subject: I listened again

and I really don't think that is what he is saying. I have worked for this doc for 2 years, he is very easy to understand but I have never heard him say anything remotely like this before. Thanks for helping.
I listened again -
Subject: I listened again -

definitely sounds like "monodide"
I listened again ...
Subject: I listened again ...

I definitly think seasonal is correct, but can't hear exacerbations. Thank you so much for getting me on the right track! I couldn't get over seizures.
Actually, duh on ME . . . just listened and that is it
Subject: Actually, duh on ME . . . just listened and that is it

xx
Listened again
Subject: Listened again

No, the sounds are definitely
hue - vee - ul. Thanks for the try though.
listened and listened again and it is....
Subject: listened and listened again and it is....

ear and sinus surgery thanks a bunch anyways
Listened again
Subject: Listened again

When listening with a refreshed ear this a.m., it certainly is effaces. Thanks
listened again...
Subject: listened again...

absent is a possibility, but I still can't say for sure.
listened again, and no thats not it, but thanks for trying nm
Subject: listened again, and no thats not it, but thanks for trying nm


Listened again, thats it. Thanks to all! nm
Subject: Listened again, thats it. Thanks to all! nm

!
I just went and listened again - she is saying
Subject: I just went and listened again - she is saying

restricted affect. DUH for me!! It's still early for me, ears aren't working right yet.
I listened again but sm
Subject: I listened again but sm

it still sounds like "1000 draped over it".

Just re-listened and I'm LOL at myself!!!!
Subject: Just re-listened and I'm LOL at myself!!!!

He's saying T8-T10. Ha! I tried to make it more difficult than it was...
I listened again but she definitely says
Subject: I listened again but she definitely says

"bath" at the beginning so I'm just going to flag it. Thank you though!
thank you - but I just listened again s/m
Subject: thank you - but I just listened again s/m

definitely sounds like "the view margin" or "the bu-margin" - ??
Listened again
Subject: Listened again

For sure, for sure, it is removal of myxoma. It is so weird how you can hear it so clearly after someone tells you the answer.  Thanks
I listened again, definitely not deficiency, but thx for trying. mmw
Subject: I listened again, definitely not deficiency, but thx for trying. mmw


I just listened again - that's just what he's saying - thanks a bunch!!
Subject: I just listened again - that's just what he's saying - thanks a bunch!!


Listened slower, that's it thank you so much!
Subject: Listened slower, that's it thank you so much!

:-)
I listened again - that's not it, but THANKS for the input. -nm-
Subject: I listened again - that's not it, but THANKS for the input. -nm-

xx
Thanks - I listened again and she CLEARLY starts with an "m"
Subject: Thanks - I listened again and she CLEARLY starts with an "m"

I did the usual Stedman's and googling but I tell ya, this fellow is a grrrrrrr. Thanks anyway. Gonna flag it. Another grrrrrr
I listened again and sounds maybe like
Subject: I listened again and sounds maybe like

bn
I went back and listened . . .
Subject: I went back and listened . . .

It sounds like "reostis" or "reosis" to sight.  This is an ESL but he's not too hard to understand. Thanks for your help.
That's it! Went back and listened again. Thx!
Subject: That's it! Went back and listened again. Thx!

nm
Listened to it again...and nope! Thanks though!
Subject: Listened to it again...and nope! Thanks though!

:)
I listened again lead III and AVF Thanks anyways
Subject: I listened again lead III and AVF Thanks anyways


I listened over and over again - it may be background
Subject: I listened over and over again - it may be background


listened again - why would it be elevated?
Subject: listened again - why would it be elevated?


I sounds more like K per al when I listened again.
Subject: I sounds more like K per al when I listened again.


Went back and listened again
Subject: Went back and listened again

but he definitely says "4-5" shaver. Thanks for your help though!
appendicits? Have you listened to
Subject: appendicits? Have you listened to

the rest of the dictation? If not, leave it blank and then see what the impression is. That might be of some help.
I listened again and he is repeating it
Subject: I listened again and he is repeating it

Says ECOG and then gives the letters, ECOG, but it sounded like he was saying A instead of E. Thanks anyway.
I listened again.. maybe s/l hemolymph?? thank you
Subject: I listened again.. maybe s/l hemolymph?? thank you


Went back and listened again sm
Subject: Went back and listened again sm

It definitely starts with an "S" sound but thank you anyway.  It s/l "soltus"  
Sorry just listened again a little closer
Subject: Sorry just listened again a little closer

And got the correct word.
Listened again and am still not sure. Will flag it.
Subject: Listened again and am still not sure. Will flag it.

!
Thanks, I listened again and figured it out.
Subject: Thanks, I listened again and figured it out.

Glad to know I am right though.  Thanks.