He is probably referring to the uptake
Posted By: s/m on 2008-06-25
In Reply to: radiology- PET scan ? - Christina
Subject: He is probably referring to the uptake
of the scan. Can't remember if those first 2 letters are correct, though.
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
s/l go-wan 2 3 uptake scans nm.
Subject: s/l go-wan 2 3 uptake scans nm.
d
s/l floracid uptake
Subject: s/l floracid uptake
The patient was seen again still complaining of significant amounts of ocular pain and photophobia. On examination, the patient did demonstrate a decrease in the s/l floracid uptake and continued to show no evidence of a stromal infiltrate.
I was thinking maybe it could be fluorescent uptake? Any thoughts?
intense FDG uptake?
Subject: intense FDG uptake?
Sheesh, got it, slow on the uptake here this a.m....
Subject: Sheesh, got it, slow on the uptake here this a.m....
It is Behcet's syndrome...
Thanks anyway...
s/l increased skud uptake?
Subject: s/l increased skud uptake?
on stress test. Previous report says gut uptake, but not able to verify. Any suggestions or help would be greatly appreciated.
I-131 uptake/scan - I-131 s/l "corad". is this correct?
Subject: I-131 uptake/scan - I-131 s/l "corad". is this correct?
SUV for standard uptake values? See info.
Subject: SUV for standard uptake values? See info.
Standard uptake values, SUVs, for. malignant lesions usually increase over the ..... [8] M. Ivanovic, W. McCartney, A Khandani, , "Standard Uptake values in ...
ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel5/9892/31439/01466789.pdf?arnumber=1466789 - Similar pages
[ More results from ieeexplore.ieee.org ] |
Maximum Standard Uptake Values of Mediastinal Nodes on PET and CT. James L. Fleckenstein, MD. University of Oklahoma College of Medicine at Tulsa, ...
ats.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/short/84/5/1797-b?rss=1 - Similar pages |
Prognostic value of different standard uptake values (SUV) of primary tumor measured with FDG-PET in resectable non-small cell lung cancer. ...
www.asco.org/portal/site/ASCO/menuitem.34d60f5624ba07fd506fe310ee37a01d/?vgnextoid=76f8201eb61a7010VgnVCM... - 48k - Cached - Similar pages |
increased uptake right T-L junction (lumbosacral spine) is this typed right?
Subject: increased uptake right T-L junction (lumbosacral spine) is this typed right?
STRESS: Images reveal decreased uptake of radioisotope in the inferior wall and BASAL septum.
Subject: STRESS: Images reveal decreased uptake of radioisotope in the inferior wall and BASAL septum.
what? What are you referring to?
Subject: what? What are you referring to?
and not all MTs are *girls* by the way.........
maybe referring to vas (sm)
Subject: maybe referring to vas (sm)
- a tube that transports sperm from the epididymis to the seminal vesicles
??
I don't think so because that would be referring to someone
Subject: I don't think so because that would be referring to someone
who looks for analogies. I think he means that the symptoms are like a prodrome to the syndrome. Plus, he pronounces it al-o-gest (with guh sound, not gee). Thanks though!
Could be referring to
Subject: Could be referring to
the 3/3 recall test. Patient is shown 3 objects and then after a few minutes asked to recall them. Just a guess. :-)
Referring to MI?
Subject: Referring to MI?
Could be biopsy. Endomyocardial biopsy ?
I believe it's referring
Subject: I believe it's referring
to the fact that a female is a virgin, but kind of silly as you can be non-marital and non-virgin. ;-) Outdated, I believe.
Are you referring to
Subject: Are you referring to
Medi Strumpf? You're not going with that one?? :-)
You are right - referring to those 3 tests - and I would (sm)
Subject: You are right - referring to those 3 tests - and I would (sm)
transcribe it like this
drop, can, and arc.
Thanks, that helps! That's probably what he was referring to then.
Subject: Thanks, that helps! That's probably what he was referring to then.
I wasn't finding anything for AP node, but I do for the AP window lymph node as you said, so that seems right. Plus, it fits with the area he's talking about. Thanks!
If it's got caine on the end, it's referring to an
Subject: If it's got caine on the end, it's referring to an
anesthetic. Perhaps they mean "with an antibiotic".
I've never heard of that, maybe it's Marcaine?
Could be referring to troponin I being 713..nm
Subject: Could be referring to troponin I being 713..nm
nm
I capitalize them because they are referring sm
Subject: I capitalize them because they are referring sm
to specific sections of the report with that exact header. If you were referring to the "laboratory" below and your header was "Diagnostic Data Blah-Blah", then you'd leave "laboratory" lowercase.
Sentence please, what is it referring to?
Subject: Sentence please, what is it referring to?
x
radiopharmaceutical - he is referring
Subject: radiopharmaceutical - he is referring
to the drug that the patient was given, such as adenosine or dobutamine.
It could be that "purpose" is referring to
Subject: It could be that "purpose" is referring to
puposeful movement, such as walking straight, turning, reaching to grasp, etc., sort of on the line of testing for "intention" tremors.
in this case doc is referring to several .sm
Subject: in this case doc is referring to several .sm
patent ductus arteriosus and clearly dictates s/l "arterios-es.
No, doc was referring to ability to eat
Subject: No, doc was referring to ability to eat
The previous sentence had talked about having a swallow study and having dysphagia, so I am sure the word did not refer to word-finding or memory impairment. Doc very clearly stated "pneumestic" -- I just cannot find anything that closely resembles that word, and I sure don't know where QA got it from.
Even when referring to the eye, both are correct.
Subject: Even when referring to the eye, both are correct.
It is correct to use either disc or disk when referring to the eye.
BUS is referring to the glands s/m
Subject: BUS is referring to the glands s/m
Bartholin, urethral, Skene and I assume VV means vaginal vault. So, it would be BUS and VV or BUS/VV
No, it is referring to his speciality, not his
Subject: No, it is referring to his speciality, not his
x
Believe this is referring to a soleus -sm
Subject: Believe this is referring to a soleus -sm
Could she be referring to coumadin?
Subject: Could she be referring to coumadin?
I noticed the patient was on 5 mg of coumadin on the last progress note. Do you think she may be referring to coumadin?
Was - is referring to lidocaine, not the 5 mL.
Subject: Was - is referring to lidocaine, not the 5 mL.
x
Of course, it was referring to the lidocaine,
Subject: Of course, it was referring to the lidocaine,
but it still sounds better if you use "was" instead of "were." Just as you wouldn't say, "2 cups of water was spilled" but instead, "2 cups of water were spilled." It's a matter of what sounds better, in some cases. :-)
Referring to symptoms of diabetes.
Subject: Referring to symptoms of diabetes.
polyuria, polydypsia, and polyphasia--excessive urination, excessive thirst, and excessive eating or hunger.
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1189/is_4_273/ai_75608724
maybe referring to Milk of Magnesia....nm
Subject: maybe referring to Milk of Magnesia....nm
.
The test you are referring to is called the
Subject: The test you are referring to is called the
'empty beer can test.'
Referring Physician Site
Subject: Referring Physician Site
http://www.healthcarehiring.com/cgi-bin/provider_name.cgi
I like this site, as you can change the state at the bottom, and also do partial names. Hope this helps.
Not refered...referring...kick me now!
Subject: Not refered...referring...kick me now!
Referring to stool, melenic NM
Subject: Referring to stool, melenic NM
xxxx
I think he is referring to edges of clot
Subject: I think he is referring to edges of clot
nm
What part of body is he referring to????
Subject: What part of body is he referring to????
x
For chondromalacia, what numerals are you referring to? Thanks
Subject: For chondromalacia, what numerals are you referring to? Thanks
This is a surgery the doctor is referring to
Subject: This is a surgery the doctor is referring to
Could be referring to the eyes, pallor. ??
Subject: Could be referring to the eyes, pallor. ??
I think the poster is referring to the skin in ROS.
Subject: I think the poster is referring to the skin in ROS.
This is under Review of Symptoms- skin (This was from her post above) Kinda cannot see the skin at first.
Could be referring to the "detrusor" muscle. ????
Subject: Could be referring to the "detrusor" muscle. ????
x
Stedman's lists neither. If this is referring
Subject: Stedman's lists neither. If this is referring
to your post of 2 days ago on cannulas, there is Kahn and there is Cohen, both uterine cannulas.
Stedman's lists neither. If this is referring
Subject: Stedman's lists neither. If this is referring
to your post of 2 days ago on cannulas, there is Kahn and there is Cohen, both uterine cannulas.
could be referring to "Mirizzi's" syndrome, sm
Subject: could be referring to "Mirizzi's" syndrome, sm
common hepatic duct obstruction caused by extrinsic compression from an impacted stone in the cystic duct
1-1/2 as he is referring to the tablet/pill.
Subject: 1-1/2 as he is referring to the tablet/pill.
x
I give up! Why ouch?! I was referring to myself!...nm
Subject: I give up! Why ouch?! I was referring to myself!...nm
nm
|
