He does have a mild s/l pivot lie, but no significant pivot shift
Posted By: No Name on 2007-12-21
In Reply to:
Subject: He does have a mild s/l pivot lie, but no significant pivot shift
Thanks :-)
Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old. To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
Lachman, pivot shift and * manuever
Subject: Lachman, pivot shift and * manuever
Left knee problems. Lachman, pivot shift and s/l seg maneuvers are negative. Thank you
may be referring to crepitations with lateral pivot shift of the knee. If you clearly hear it,
Subject: may be referring to crepitations with lateral pivot shift of the knee. If you clearly hear it,
x
s/l Pivot tube feeds? Thanks
Subject: s/l Pivot tube feeds? Thanks
Pivot is a food - see link
Subject: Pivot is a food - see link
http://rpdcon40.ross.com/mn/Ross+MN+Nutritional+Products.nsf/web_Ross.com_XML/BF7AEC0810EF6CFD85256EF2006F85B3?OpenDocument
The patient was placed on Pivot tube feeds.
Subject: The patient was placed on Pivot tube feeds.
Thanks
8-month-old child. On exam has some mild s/l mic-groth-nia and possibly some mild low set ears.
Subject: 8-month-old child. On exam has some mild s/l mic-groth-nia and possibly some mild low set ears.
Me neither, just hit the shift-key ???
Subject: Me neither, just hit the shift-key ???
q.shift
Subject: q.shift
the doc says fetal heart checks q.shift. can we put q.shift or is it something else.
q.shift
Subject: q.shift
well the specifics don't actually mention about this, but i wanted to know whether there is something as q.shift
q.shift
Subject: q.shift
i mean whether in this sentence q.shift is valid of not
q.shift
Subject: q.shift
tx nm that helps
just left shift key does it for me
Subject: just left shift key does it for me
I got this from the Shorthand people. Evidently, this is a common thing.
MLS=midline shift? sm
Subject: MLS=midline shift? sm
another wild guess here, but perhaps on the CT scan they can see a posterior MLS (midline shift)...caused by the hemorrhage...and now showing up as a hematoma or contusion within the midline shift???
shift and maintain
Subject: shift and maintain
"a test requiring her to shift and maintain a new set requiring her to inhibit previous learned response."
what is shift n maintain?
Yep, Ctrl+shift+N
Subject: Yep, Ctrl+shift+N
/
Ctrl+Shift+8 took care of it. Thanks anyway!!
Subject: Ctrl+Shift+8 took care of it. Thanks anyway!!
nm
If you use Shorthand, try hitting Ctrl, then ALT, then Shift. NM
Subject: If you use Shorthand, try hitting Ctrl, then ALT, then Shift. NM
x
yes - it just means "every" shift, so it does make
Subject: yes - it just means "every" shift, so it does make
sense - it is a term that is used.
Third-spacing is correct. Refers to fluid shift
Subject: Third-spacing is correct. Refers to fluid shift
to interstitial space.
"Ctrl, ALT, Shift" worked to switch CAPS lock OFF
Subject: "Ctrl, ALT, Shift" worked to switch CAPS lock OFF
THANK YOU.
"Ctrl, ALT, Shift" worked to switch CAPS lock OFF
Jonathan
Cute! Glad you had a good laugh to break up your shift! :) nm
Subject: Cute! Glad you had a good laugh to break up your shift! :) nm
s
In Word, press Ctrl + Shift + ; then the letter you want to get umlaut
Subject: In Word, press Ctrl + Shift + ; then the letter you want to get umlaut
You can make it an AutoCorrect entry if this is something you often do.
Yes, it's a constantly running feeding and the tubing gets flushed with a syringe once a shift. n
Subject: Yes, it's a constantly running feeding and the tubing gets flushed with a syringe once a shift. nm
s
I've heard the term nighthawk, person who works night shift.
Subject: I've heard the term nighthawk, person who works night shift.
is it possible that he says "a significant portion"?
Subject: is it possible that he says "a significant portion"?
significant? stigmata of? nm
Subject: significant? stigmata of? nm
s
No Significant Enlargement?
Subject: No Significant Enlargement?
History significant for "IPP" at age 6?
Subject: History significant for "IPP" at age 6?
I don't see anything in my Abbr. book that might fit this. s/l IPP or IPT. Any ideas anyone? THanks!
hemodynamically significant stenosis?
Subject: hemodynamically significant stenosis?
A significant relative weakness?
Subject: A significant relative weakness?
He has a significant relative weakness with executive functioning...
Is 'significant relative' correct?
No evidence for hemodynamically significant stenosis.
Subject: No evidence for hemodynamically significant stenosis.
nm
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
NSA = no significant abnormality or no sign. anomaly. nm
Subject: NSA = no significant abnormality or no sign. anomaly. nm
PMH: Significant for s/l valve plus atrial fibrillation. Thank you Debbie
Subject: PMH: Significant for s/l valve plus atrial fibrillation. Thank you Debbie
Family history significant for s/l share-covery II. thank you
Subject: Family history significant for s/l share-covery II. thank you
|