C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Posted By: Barbara on 2008-12-20
In Reply to:
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM
s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."
I'm at a loss. I don't do this account often. I know, poor excuse.
Thanks for any help.
quick section (as in frozen section) is correct.
Subject: quick section (as in frozen section) is correct.
x
C-section or cesarean section sm
Subject: C-section or cesarean section sm
Not cAesarean section - contrary to popular belief, it was not named after Julius Caesar.
C-section or cesarean section nm
Subject: C-section or cesarean section nm
s/l "there was a tightly propreciated......"
Subject: s/l "there was a tightly propreciated......"
s/l "there was a tightly propreciated in the distal left internal carotid artery"
This patient had a carotid ultrasound and the doc is talking about what they found.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Abby
Never? (dr states "there is tenderness on ballotting the knee?")
Subject: Never? (dr states "there is tenderness on ballotting the knee?")
On CXR: "There are some left apical s/l boa." Yes, sounds like the constrictor.
Subject: On CXR: "There are some left apical s/l boa." Yes, sounds like the constrictor.
"There was no evidence of a deep vein thromposis"
How do these RN's get out of HIGH SCHOOL without being able to read?
Could it be "there is no spasm or tenderness or cervical spine atrophy (but doc is saying cervica
Subject: Could it be "there is no spasm or tenderness or cervical spine atrophy (but doc is saying cervical spine atrophies?)
MRI findings
Subject: MRI findings
Patient is an adult female in a motor vehicle accident with skull fractures, epidural hematoma, subdural hematoma, and cerebral s/l *neurulation* on CT. Any ideas? Thanks!
x-ray findings help
Subject: x-ray findings help
Is there such a thing as N.C. IVF encroachment?
x-ray findings help
Subject: x-ray findings help
Thanks
x-ray findings help
Subject: x-ray findings help
NC-IVF = natural-cycle IVF encroachment
CT Findings
Subject: CT Findings
Upon review the CT of his chest does show negative pulmonary embolism however does show linear s/l alexisis of the lung bases and mild cardiomegaly.
TIA!
is it possible that he says "a significant portion"?
Subject: is it possible that he says "a significant portion"?
significant? stigmata of? nm
Subject: significant? stigmata of? nm
s
No Significant Enlargement?
Subject: No Significant Enlargement?
Echo Findings
Subject: Echo Findings
Can you hear coaptation of the cusps?
...findings as delineated above. (NM)
Subject: ...findings as delineated above. (NM)
paucity of findings
Subject: paucity of findings
Ortho MRI findings s/l sm
Subject: Ortho MRI findings s/l sm
Reviewed the patient's recent radiographic findings with her. These include MRI of the cervical spine. This does reveal some shallow disc herniation s/l "and indented sac" at C4-C5 and C6-C7 levels.
mammogram findings
Subject: mammogram findings
Is it BI-RADS or BIRADS?
Thanks is advance for your help!
PET scan findings
Subject: PET scan findings
s/l - no significant increase in glag-o-lytic activity in the left lower lobe mass. ???
TIA
Findings of a colonscopy:
Subject: Findings of a colonscopy:
The terminal ileum was s/l inabating and was normal.
History significant for "IPP" at age 6?
Subject: History significant for "IPP" at age 6?
I don't see anything in my Abbr. book that might fit this. s/l IPP or IPT. Any ideas anyone? THanks!
hemodynamically significant stenosis?
Subject: hemodynamically significant stenosis?
A significant relative weakness?
Subject: A significant relative weakness?
He has a significant relative weakness with executive functioning...
Is 'significant relative' correct?
Did the dictator list the findings? If so, we may be able to sm
Subject: Did the dictator list the findings? If so, we may be able to sm
put it all together.
He is probably describing the findings on an MRI scan SM
Subject: He is probably describing the findings on an MRI scan SM
If a patient has had spine surgery, the MRI is more than likely done with contrast. The contrast causes the MRI to "signal" when the contrast is bright in any area. That's what it means.
One way to verify findings on Google sm
Subject: One way to verify findings on Google sm
If I am looking for a catheter, instrument, etc., if the little "R" registered trademark is used, usually it is correct, because they don't go to the trouble to put the trademark if they aren't being reasonable conscientious about spelling it right.
HOWEVER....sometimes I get multiple results with the "R" and they're different. In that case, I try to find the site for the company that manufactures the item. It is usually listed on the first page of Google results.
A lot of the more well-known drugs have their own sites - like www.coumadin.com.
But the right colon is mentioned in findings. Can we have
Subject: But the right colon is mentioned in findings. Can we have
s
accessory clinical findings
Subject: accessory clinical findings
accessory, like jewelry:) flattering (clinical findings) to the diagnosis
sl tycycle findings noted
Subject: sl tycycle findings noted
Patient with NLP eye with mature cataract. Any ideas?
Thanks.
is this a procedure, test findings??
Subject: is this a procedure, test findings??
No evidence for hemodynamically significant stenosis.
Subject: No evidence for hemodynamically significant stenosis.
nm
NSA = no significant abnormality or no sign. anomaly. nm
Subject: NSA = no significant abnormality or no sign. anomaly. nm
|
