Agree that SO is hyphenated, but according
Posted By: sm on 2009-02-16
In Reply to: Actually, it is only one word, BUT sm - in the know
Subject: Agree that SO is hyphenated, but according
to BOS, the 2 vowels together no longer require hyphenation in all words.
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
I agree- not hyphenated
Subject: I agree- not hyphenated
it is hyphenated as I know it...sm
Subject: it is hyphenated as I know it...sm
as I know it, been transcribing for 25+ years, it's a-fib or A-fib if not said out completely as atrial fibrillation.
pop-off (hyphenated).
Subject: pop-off (hyphenated).
definitely hyphenated :)
Subject: definitely hyphenated :)
I use the hyphenated one. nm
Subject: I use the hyphenated one. nm
s
It is probably not hyphenated though.
Subject: It is probably not hyphenated though.
I don't think it needs to be hyphenated.
Subject: I don't think it needs to be hyphenated.
It should only be hyphenated if
Subject: It should only be hyphenated if
the measurement precedes the noun - as in 4-mm mole versus a mole 4 mm in diameter. It should always be abbreviated mm when an exact measurement is given, i.e. 4 mm versus a few millimeters (in case that's what you're asking).
hyphenated-SM
Subject: hyphenated-SM
Double and triple adjectives describing a noun are always hypenated. so agree with PC post.
Would this be hyphenated?
Subject: Would this be hyphenated?
Hello everyone!
Quick question... hyphens are sometimes difficult for me..
Would this be hyphenated?
"There is a 7-year-history of rather severe rhinitis beginning each Memorial Day and ending each July 4"
Thank you! :)
I'm sorry - is that yes it is hyphenated??? nm
Subject: I'm sorry - is that yes it is hyphenated??? nm
xx
Yes it is hyphenated.
Subject: Yes it is hyphenated.
x
I have never seen it hyphenated!
Subject: I have never seen it hyphenated!
Thanks, I meant hyphenated...
Subject: Thanks, I meant hyphenated...
hyphenated words.
Subject: hyphenated words.
<>
The radiologists I work for do spell words right out of their books for me. What I notice is that their spelling does not often agree with my Stedman's books, but occasionally I can find their spelling in an HPI book (homolog/homologue is an example). But their books use many unneccessary hyphens, and it makes my job of listening more difficult when the MDs keep "helping" me by dictating words as hyphenated that are not hyphenated in Dorland's or any other dictionary.
These professional writers need to stop with the hyphenated words.
hyphenated-been doing it wrong for yrs...LOL...nm
Subject: hyphenated-been doing it wrong for yrs...LOL...nm
x
No hyphen. Would be hyphenated if followed
Subject: No hyphen. Would be hyphenated if followed
xx
I'm assuming this is not hyphenated, but...
Subject: I'm assuming this is not hyphenated, but...
"He sustained a laceration just below the lower lip that is through and through into the upper portion..." I'm assuming since through and through is not modifying in this case, that I do not hyphenate, but I just want to be sure. Thanks!
1.2-cm (hyphenated) scaly. #2 is best. nm
Subject: 1.2-cm (hyphenated) scaly. #2 is best. nm
sorry - hayseed is right, not hyphenated. nm
Subject: sorry - hayseed is right, not hyphenated. nm
x
I would do like you have it. Reads better than hyphenated I think. nm
Subject: I would do like you have it. Reads better than hyphenated I think. nm
THIS MUST BE HYPHENATED, AS IT IS USED AS A NOUN..nm
Subject: THIS MUST BE HYPHENATED, AS IT IS USED AS A NOUN..nm
nm
hyphenated fraction
Subject: hyphenated fraction
I just got a note from QA telling me that fractions are not hyphenated. Should be 1 1/2 and not 1-1/2. This just does not even look right to me! Have I been doing this wrong for the past 12 years?
I always have hyphenated T-wave.
Subject: I always have hyphenated T-wave.
Per BOS no longer hyphenated
Subject: Per BOS no longer hyphenated
Depends on your client's preferences of course, but according to BOS:
"Sociocultural designations...
Hyphenation. It is no longer necessary (or preferred) to hyphenate designations of Americans who are identified by their ethnicity, race, or nationality of origin, either in the noun form or the adjectival form."
Has not been hyphenated for years--per
Subject: Has not been hyphenated for years--per
x
Was hyphenated, now not anymore...nm
Subject: Was hyphenated, now not anymore...nm
nm
Not hyphenated just blue load. nm
Subject: Not hyphenated just blue load. nm
x
describing gait would be hyphenated...sm
Subject: describing gait would be hyphenated...sm
gait is broad based
patient has a broad-based gait.........
I've seen mostly the hyphenated version used.
Subject: I've seen mostly the hyphenated version used.
The last few places I was with didn't even want the hyphenated
Subject: The last few places I was with didn't even want the hyphenated
s
Used to be 2 words, then hyphenated, now can be just one word. nm
Subject: Used to be 2 words, then hyphenated, now can be just one word. nm
jj
African-American hyphenated?
Subject: African-American hyphenated?
I was always taught African-American was hyphenated, and that's the way it came up on the ASR for the longest time. Now, it comes up without the hypen. Thoughts? We don't hyphenate Caucansian-male.
One thought - if the Indians are using our ASR, they should have to submit corrections before they are changed.
Just call me cornfused and befuzzled.
list inside for prefixes that don't need hyphenated
Subject: list inside for prefixes that don't need hyphenated
Do not hyphenate the following:
ante |
intra |
semi |
anti |
micro |
sub |
bi |
mid |
super |
co |
non |
supra |
contra |
over |
trans |
counter |
pre |
tri |
de |
post |
ultra |
extra |
pro |
un |
infra |
pseudo |
under |
inter |
re |
weight |
transposing names in a hyphenated instrument name
Subject: transposing names in a hyphenated instrument name
Does it matter when the doctor dictates the names in a different order than is listed in the word books? For example, O'Connor-O'Sullivan vs. O'Sullivan-O'Connor retractor.
Sorry, should have been more specific - should pain free be hyphenated?
Subject: Sorry, should have been more specific - should pain free be hyphenated?
Does anyone know of a site that has a list of hyphenated medical words?
Subject: Does anyone know of a site that has a list of hyphenated medical words?
Does anyone know of a site that has a list of hyphenated medical words? I have tried searching to see if someone has posted this question before and could not find anything. TIA :)
Osgood-Schlatter disease is hyphenated in Stedman's.
Subject: Osgood-Schlatter disease is hyphenated in Stedman's.
Yes, it is hyphenated, salpingo-oophorectomy, it is one word, 3 vowels cannot be together, sm
Subject: Yes, it is hyphenated, salpingo-oophorectomy, it is one word, 3 vowels cannot be together, sm
Google:
Compounds with these prefixes are sometimes (but not always)
hyphenated to avoid doubling a vowel or tripling a consonant or vowel, and sometimes even to prevent initial misreading or mispronunciation.
Stedman's Cardiovascular has words hyphenated, hope this helps! Nm
Subject: Stedman's Cardiovascular has words hyphenated, hope this helps! Nm
nm
Is year old still hyphenated as in 74-year-old? nm
Subject: Is year old still hyphenated as in 74-year-old? nm
I agree with this....
Subject: I agree with this....
I agree...I think hematopoiesis is correct because there is a hematopoietic marrow..so all of that shoud fit in together...Hope this helps.
I agree.....sm
Subject: I agree.....sm
Faint visualization of the appendix sounds right. I type BE's all day (lucky me!!)
Agree! nm
Subject: Agree! nm
x
I agree - sm
Subject: I agree - sm
As long as a testee is allowed to use reference material, etc. why should they not ask a question here? I personally research all of my own questions, but I do help out those that ask on this site, as well, if I know the answer. Besides, who made the above poster the "tester police" anyway? I saw no complaint from the administrator concerning multiple posts for a similar question.
Agree. nm
Subject: Agree. nm
x
I definitely agree!
Subject: I definitely agree!
He (or she, can't tell!) is saying peri J-tube abscess, which I am taking to mean there is an abscess in or around the J-tube insertion site, but peri-J-tube looks terrible and can't find periabscess or peri-abscess to reword the sentence. I have had this same dictator for the last 2 1/2 hours since I logged on!!!!
Agree with you...
Subject: Agree with you...
And after all that, the most professional and correct answer would actually be...leave a blank ;)
Yes, I agree with that but--sm
Subject: Yes, I agree with that but--sm
some people quote from this thing like it is the Bible or something, and it just is not. There are A LOT of doctors out there who do not adhere by the BOS and prefer their own guidelines. It does not make them wrong. It is just a matter of preference, more than anything. What's the AAMT gonna do, slap your hand if you don't use their guidelines?? shheesh. what a rip!
I would agree with you that...
Subject: I would agree with you that...
it's either "skull base structures" or even more likely "skull and bony structures". I have never seen "scobi" in my years either, but see how it can be easily misunderstood as that for one the phrases above with a fast dictator.
I agree with M.A. -- sm
Subject: I agree with M.A. -- sm
I think the "reostis" is "sphero" and "sight" is "cyte" -- giving the word "spherocyte".
Have a great weekend.
|
