Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

...findings as delineated above. (NM)

Posted By: No Name on 2007-09-24
In Reply to: I don't know this word... - please see msg

Subject: ...findings as delineated above. (NM)



Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Other related messages found in our database

delineated
Subject: delineated

x
would think "clearly" delineated would fit here
Subject: would think "clearly" delineated would fit here

nm
would radially delineated make sense?
Subject: would radially delineated make sense?

It total sounds like rarely though!
MRI findings
Subject: MRI findings

Patient is an adult female in a motor vehicle accident with skull fractures, epidural hematoma, subdural hematoma, and cerebral s/l *neurulation* on CT.  Any ideas?  Thanks!
x-ray findings help
Subject: x-ray findings help

Is there such a thing as N.C. IVF encroachment?

x-ray findings help
Subject: x-ray findings help

Thanks
x-ray findings help
Subject: x-ray findings help

NC-IVF = natural-cycle IVF encroachment
CT Findings
Subject: CT Findings

Upon review the CT of his chest does show negative pulmonary embolism however does show linear s/l alexisis of the lung bases and mild cardiomegaly.

TIA!
Echo Findings
Subject: Echo Findings

Can you hear coaptation of the cusps?
paucity of findings
Subject: paucity of findings

Ortho MRI findings s/l sm
Subject: Ortho MRI findings s/l sm

Reviewed the patient's recent radiographic findings with her. These include MRI of the cervical spine. This does reveal some shallow disc herniation s/l "and indented sac" at C4-C5 and C6-C7 levels.

mammogram findings
Subject: mammogram findings

Is it BI-RADS or BIRADS?


Thanks is advance for your help!

PET scan findings
Subject: PET scan findings

s/l - no significant increase in glag-o-lytic activity in the left lower lobe mass.  ???


TIA

Findings of a colonscopy:
Subject: Findings of a colonscopy:

The terminal ileum was s/l inabating and was normal.
Did the dictator list the findings? If so, we may be able to sm
Subject: Did the dictator list the findings? If so, we may be able to sm

put it all together.
He is probably describing the findings on an MRI scan SM
Subject: He is probably describing the findings on an MRI scan SM

If a patient has had spine surgery, the MRI is more than likely done with contrast.  The contrast causes the MRI to "signal" when the contrast is bright in any area.  That's what it means.
One way to verify findings on Google sm
Subject: One way to verify findings on Google sm

If I am looking for a catheter, instrument, etc., if the little "R" registered trademark is used, usually it is correct, because they don't go to the trouble to put the trademark if they aren't being reasonable conscientious about spelling it right.


HOWEVER....sometimes I get multiple results with the "R" and they're different. In that case, I try to find the site for the company that manufactures the item. It is usually listed on the first page of Google results.


A lot of the more well-known drugs have their own sites - like www.coumadin.com.

But the right colon is mentioned in findings. Can we have
Subject: But the right colon is mentioned in findings. Can we have

s
accessory clinical findings
Subject: accessory clinical findings

accessory, like jewelry:) flattering (clinical findings) to the diagnosis
sl tycycle findings noted
Subject: sl tycycle findings noted

Patient with NLP eye with mature cataract.  Any ideas? 


Thanks.

is this a procedure, test findings??
Subject: is this a procedure, test findings??

Question on bone scan findings
Subject: Question on bone scan findings

The patient had a bone scan demonstrating findings suspicious for osseous metastases.  "There was sclerosis seen involving the left acromion and left ilium.  However, the skull findings [s/l equivocal as of normality?] and plain film appears to correspond to a sclerotic area involving the inner table."  Does that make sense as is?  I haven't heard that before.

...heart-related findings? Usually elevated after
Subject: ...heart-related findings? Usually elevated after

s
he says findings show a redudant sigmoid and
Subject: he says findings show a redudant sigmoid and

descending colon with approximately 150 mL of retained fluid from her prep suggesting a s/l slow transfer? constipation


 



thank you all for all of your help.  I couldn't do this without you.  You're the best!

C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 

C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 

C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 

C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 

C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 

C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 

C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 

C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 

C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 

C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 

C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 

C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 

C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 

C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 

C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 

C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 

C-section findings: "There was significant SM
Subject: C-section findings: "There was significant SM

s/l envascular desidure reaction on both surfaces of the uterus."


I'm at a loss.  I don't do this account often.  I know, poor excuse. 



Thanks for any help.  


 


 

Are there multiple problems--maybe a CONSTELLATION of findings
Subject: Are there multiple problems--maybe a CONSTELLATION of findings

It is u der findings and not technique. He clearly says isolem adjacent!
Subject: It is u der findings and not technique. He clearly says isolem adjacent!

excessory/accessory clinical findings?
Subject: excessory/accessory clinical findings?

At this point I've over-thought it, and would appreciate if someone knows.  Thanks!
is there a CHLO test, pt with findings of antral gastritis
Subject: is there a CHLO test, pt with findings of antral gastritis

I have discussed my findings and **Dennis’s** recommendations with the patient. nm
Subject: I have discussed my findings and **Dennis’s** recommendations with the patient. nm

Put under GENERAL looking at face and commenting on findings, flat affect. nm Ta
Subject: Put under GENERAL looking at face and commenting on findings, flat affect. nm Ta

.
Findings in operative: Uterus s/l "tone seismic" position
Subject: Findings in operative: Uterus s/l "tone seismic" position

Uterus s/l "tone seismic" position.  Cervical os about already dilated.  Uterus was sound to 10 cm.  Moderate amount of s/l horrific flexion" were obtained.  No adnexal mass is palpable.
48-hour pH test completed and extensive *physiatry* to view the findings which demonstrated
Subject: 48-hour pH test completed and extensive *physiatry* to view the findings which demonstrated

She states that she is unable to eat, continues to lose weight, and is having bouts of vomiting.  She did have her 48-hour pH test completed and extensive *physiatry* to view the findings which demonstrated that on the first night when she had vomited after her procedure, there were some episodes of breakthrough acid; however, the following day when she was tolerating a diet and had her AcipHex, her pH was well controlled, above a pH of 4, essentially the entire time.  Therefore, I discussed with the patient that her chest burning does not appear to be correlated with breakthrough acid of any significant degree and suggests the possibility that a lot of her chest pain and burning may be related to her anxiety and depression.
© Copyright 2001-09 MTStars.com All Rights Reserved