sick bigoted hateful comments
Posted By: underdog on 2008-11-27
In Reply to: Anchor babies are natural citizens... sm - m
digusting
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
Sick, bigoted and disgusting
anchor babies are. What part of ILLEGAL is it that you don't understand?
Her comments are not hateful, considering
the general consensus is that Palin has hurt McCain more than his connection to Bush. By the way, MrsM never said she hated Palin, but she obviously has a strong opinion about her, and MrsM did not personally attack by namecalling anyone else on here for their opinion. And yet another example of twisting someone's words to suit their own agenda. McPalin has taught you well, Grasshopper.
Funny how you don't think Mrs. M comments above are hateful..nm
SHE'S anger? Take a look at your posts. Hateful, nasty, full of sick glee for other humans beings
x
I am not bigoted at all...
Just because we are from different worlds does not mean that I am bigoted in any way, shape, or form. It just means that we perceive things very differently.
There was nothing bigoted.........sm
about that remark. It was merely stating Obama's racial makeup which contains more Arab blood than what is considered "black" by American standards. Nothing racial or bigoted at all. Why is it you bleeding-heart liberals are always the ones who cry "racist" when a statement is made concerning Obama's heritage but yet are so darn proud to have elected the nation's first (seemingly) black president? Sheesh
Geez....bigoted much????
nm
what a bigoted point of view!
I suppose it is okay for the "men" to have affairs and the other issues they have had? that's not dysfunctional? It is okay to leave it to the women to take to fix their crap?
This really makes me both mad and sad --
Bigoted malcontents have a way of self-combusting.
x
I didn't get bigoted from poster......it's just
nm
So you expect racist, bigoted hate speech from one side
The culture wars were waged from one side..the one whose campaign is so bankrupt that it has to resort to slamming the other candidate into the ground because they cannot come up with one single effective strategy to distinguish him from the incumbent lame duck and his scorched earth administration. What did you expect...a field of white flags. You asked for it and you got it. Motion denied.
You just can't see how hateful you are
can you? You just accused someone of being and alcoholic without knowing one thing about him or her. You are the one who gets loopier the longer you post. You are the reason along with your ilk that no one can post anyone where on this forum and I sincerely hope that the moderator bans you.
If you act this hateful, then you probably
nm
You should know by know how hateful
nm
What is hateful about it? sm
It's a protest. We do that in this country. She's a politician. People disagree with her political positions and policies and it's hateful? You're taking it waaaay too personally. If you go out and protest against your governor's policies, does that make you hateful, for expressing your opinion and disagreeing with your governor? Of course not. Ladies, SP is not your mother/daughter/sister/BFF. She can handle herself. Keep in mind, she's a *politician.* They all are in this race.
it is not hateful until the end, where it says...
"Religion is but myth and superstition that hardens hearts and enslaves minds." This was clearly not meant to be nice. Also, posting near a Nativity scene was just trying to pick a fight. However, destroying the sign, stealing it or anything else is not the right thing to do either. Rather, I think that I just feel for someone who needs to be so controversial in a happy season and would ignore it, shaking my head.
It is hateful in that
it is totally unnecessary. They sure go to a lot of trouble to fight against something they don't believe in.
Exactly how have I been hateful.
x
I am sorry! But I did not mean it in a hateful
way, really, but it is what it is, isn't it?
I admit I better shouldn't have posted it, but I have the same associations DePass has when I look at her.
Maybe it is also because Obama is so much handsomer than Michelle.
It always amazes me when people see Michelle as beautiful! Only in the eye of the beholder.
JMHO, sorry about that.
You are clueless and hateful
and EVERYTHING stated in that article is LIES!
WOW the Conservatives are hateful here.
I was looking on the conservative board and there is so much aggression and anger there. What is up with that? WHY?
Are you just naturally hateful...
or do you practice? Time for your meds? For someome supposedly sympathetic to the mentally ill (i.e. those on meds), that was a pretty hateful catty little statement. Sticks and stones, Teddy. Sticks and stones.
Yes, he may be hateful and that is why Obama
Obama has distanced himself from Rev. Wright. He does not believe what Rev. Wright has started spewing. What part of this don't you and others understand.
I had a lot of very good and close friends in high school we had a lot in common and were inseparable. Now I've heard from them and their viewpoints are no where near mine and they are nobody I would ever be friends with. This goes to show that people do change.
I for one believe Obama when he says he does not agree with Rev. Wright. I'm just wondering why people won't accept that, but McCain who is still affiliated with his biggoted and hateful pastors say "I don't feel agree with them" and everyone says ok and belives him????
Please explain where Sam is hateful?
I have seen nothing hateful posted. Seriously, I want to know what you consider "hateful."
Does ot make him any less hateful.
nm
Sam argues, but is not hateful in the way
nm
Probably the same reason the hateful right is
XX
Have you always been this hateful toward the poor?
such hostility toward the working class you so strongly assert to be defending is dead-end dialog. That 95% IS the "working class", as you call them. I prefer the term income earners. If you had any clue about the true state of this economy, you would realize that not only is the 95% tax cut feasible, it is exactly what we need and it will be coming at exactly the right time when we all need it the most.
I do not live in a universe where taxpayers line up and bend over while they bail out corporate welfare deadbeats and turn a blind eye on themselves and their children. It must be a very dark world you come from where you seem to thrive on the energy it takes to sustain such hatred in your heart for the poor. My sympathies.
Is This Sign Hateful?
SEE BOTTOM OF MESSAGE FOR SIGN PIC FIRST.
======================================
CNN) -- An atheist sign criticizing Christianity that was erected alongside a Nativity scene was taken from the Legislative Building in Olympia, Washington, on Friday and later found in a ditch.
An employee from country radio station KMPS-FM in Seattle told CNN the sign was dropped off at the station by someone who found it in a ditch. "I thought it would be safe," Freedom From Religion Foundation co-founder Annie Laurie Gaylor told CNN earlier Friday. "It's always a shock when your sign is censored or stolen or mutilated. It's not something you get used to." The sign, which celebrates the winter solstice, has had some residents and Christian organizations calling atheists Scrooges because they said it was attacking the celebration of Jesus Christ's birth.
"Religion is but myth and superstition that hardens hearts and enslaves minds," the sign from the Freedom From Religion Foundation says in part. The sign, which was at the Legislative Building at 6:30 a.m. PT, was gone by 7:30 a.m., Gaylor said. The incident will not stifle the group's message, Gaylor said. Before reports of the placard's recovery, she said a temporary sign with the same message would be placed in the building's Rotunda. Gaylor said a note would be attached saying, "Thou shalt not steal."
"I guess they don't follow their own commandments," Gaylor said. "There's nothing out there with the atheist point of view, and now there is such a firestorm that we have the audacity to exist. And then [whoever took the sign] stifles our speech."
Gaylor said that police are checking security cameras pointed at the building's entrances and exits to see if they can see anyone stealing the sign.
"It's probably about 50 pounds, " Gaylor said. "My brother-in-law was huffing and puffing carrying it up the stairs. It's definitely not something you can stick under your arm or conceal."
The Washington State Patrol, which is handling the incident, could not be reached for comment.
Dan Barker, a former evangelical preacher and co-founder of the group, said it was important for atheists to see their viewpoints validated alongside everyone else's.
Barker said the display is especially important given that 25 percent of Washington state residents are unaffiliated with religion or do not believe in God. (A recent survey by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life found 23 percent of Washingtonians said they were unaffiliated with a religion and 7 percent said they didn't believe in God.)
"It's not that we are trying to coerce anyone; in a way our sign is a signal of protest," Barker said. "If there can be a Nativity scene saying that we are all going to he**ll if we don't bow down to Jesus, we should be at the table to share our views."
He said if anything, it's the Nativity scene that is the intrusion.
"Most people think December is for Christians and view our signs as an intrusion, when actually it's the other way around," he said. "People have been celebrating the winter solstice long before Christmas. We see Christianity as the intruder, trying to steal the holiday from all of us humans."
The scene in Washington state is not unfamiliar. Barker has had signs in Madison, Wisconsin, for 13 years. The placard is often turned around so the message can't be seen, and one year, someone threw acid on it, forcing the group to encase it in Plexiglas.
In Washington, D.C., the American Humanist Association began a bus ad campaign this month questioning belief in God.
"Why believe in a God?" the advertisement asks. "Just be good for goodness sake."
That ad has caused the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority to field hundreds of complaints, the group said, but it has heard just as much positive feedback, said Fred Edwords, the association's spokesman.
Edwords said the ad campaign, which features a shrugging Santa Claus, was not meant to attack Christmas but rather to reach out to an untapped audience.
Edwords maintains the campaign began in December mostly because the group had extra money left over for the year. The connection to Christmas is a coincidence, he said.
"There are a lot of people out there who don't know there are organizations like ours to serve their needs," Edwords said. "The thing is, to reach a minority group, in order to be heard, everyone in the room has to hear you, even when they don't want to."
The ad campaign, Edwords said, is to make people think. He said he doesn't expect to "convert" anyone.
But the Christian Coalition of America is urging members to oppose the advertisements.
"Although a number of humanists and atheists continue to attempt to rid God and Christmas from the public square, the American people are overwhelmingly opposed to such efforts," Roberta Combs, the group's president said in a press release.
"We will ask our millions of supporters to call the city of Washington, D.C., and Congress to stop this un-Godly campaign."
As far as the criticism goes, Edwords said there are far more controversial placards in Washington.
"That's D.C. -- this is a political center," he said. "If I can see a placard with dead fetuses on it, I think someone can look at our question and just think about it."
The anger over the display in Olympia began after it was assembled Monday. The sentiment grew after some national media personalities called upon viewers to flood the phone lines of the governor's office.
The governor's office told The Seattle Times it received more than 200 calls an hour afterward.
"I happen to be a Christian, and I don't agree with the display that is up there," Washington Gov. Christine Gregoire told The Olympian newspaper. "But that doesn't mean that as governor, I have the right to deny their ability to express their free speech."
For some, the issue isn't even that the atheists are putting their thoughts on display, but rather the way in which they are doing it.
"They are shooting themselves in the foot," said iReport contributor Rich Phillips, who describes himself as an atheist. "Everyone's out there for the holidays, trying to represent their religion, their beliefs, and it's a time to be positive."
The atheist message was never intended to attack anyone, Barker said.
"When people ask us, 'Why are you hateful? Why are you putting up something critical of people's holidays? -- we respond that we kind of feel that the Christian message is the hate message," he said. "On that Nativity scene, there is this threat of internal violence if we don't submit to that master. Hate speech goes both ways."
What mean and hateful things you say...
It makes sense that a lot of MT's are conservative. It is a job that can be done from home, earning income and still raising your own family (why I do it), which really is a pretty conservative thing to do. Being conservative does not make me stupid or any of the other hateful words that you alluded to, nor does disagreeing with you.
See how hateful liberals are? Which is why I no
nm
He's a hateful person if ever I saw one......
-
comments (sm)
PK, I agree with some things you say, certainly not all, but you talk about the righer Bush goes the lefter you go. My question is this, do you think it's healthy to let ONE PERSON change your whole ideology? I think that's way too much influence for one person to have on your life. I don't think it's healthy. You are most likely a wonderful person, but like many on the left you have let the fear of Bush really cloud your view. I don't think he's the greatest president we have ever had, but he's certainly on the scoundrel that you and others here make him out to be. I think the problem with leftward thinking as a whole is that it basically says I, as an upper middle-class taxpayer, have to take care of everyone's woes even if their woes are self-inflicted, criminally obtained, or the result of being just plain lazy. Really, in the end when I stand before God I'm only going to have to answer for myself. I do give to others, so I'm not a selfish hog, but I don't think its right for the government to tell me I have to take care of someone else who is capable taking care of themselves. I'm for helping the truly downtrodden, incapacitated, and mentally disabled, but social programs as a whole are sham and downright theft. I don't want that for Iraq or America. I think it's far time that Americans start taking responsibility for themselves and get over the victim mentality and expecting the nanny state to do everything for us.
Anyway, your post was enlightening, and really the first non-angry post I've ever read from you.
Comments
Didn't realize it was a nasty attack, thought I was addressing a point you made about videos being truth and the written word not the truth. Thinking back on the history of propanda films in this country as well as others I disagreed and was trying to use logic.....and some humor.
As far as cut and paste, unless the board administrator says we can no longer do this I will probably continue to do it on the LIBERAL board, especially if it provides documentation for a point I am trying to make. Researchers and newspapers do it often. That said, here's another cut and paste quote, but don't know who said it:
The US has become the new Webster's definition of irony: Even though most Americans, most American lawmakers, and most American military commanders had long protested the usefulness of their presence in Iraq, ironically they still considered their own government a democracy.
This reminds me of Cheney commenting that basically he didn't care what the American people thought of the war or what they wanted. I thought we were supposed to be his boss.....
Thank you for your comments....... sm
You proved my point right here.
"As far as the "man on the street" interviews, it's obvious there are a lot of people in the United States who are ill informed and/or just ignorant, to the point it would be funny if it weren't so tragic. Otherwise, they would have known Obama's views on choice and Iraq..."
These are the very people who put Obama in office. These are the people who saw a charismatic young leader, just as the uninformed or misled people in other countries who do not know our issues and/or who have only been allowed to see what their governments want them to see on television.
I don't think France feels too "friendly" towards America/Bush right now, and it hasn't been too long ago that Mexico was rising up stating that Texas was still theirs and they planned on taking it back.
I do enjoy a good debate and hope that you or anyone else takes what I say here personally. I think we all have America's best interests at heart based on our own opinions but just come at it from different backgrounds/situations. Have a blessed day!
Most of these comments.......
are just about 5 years old or older.......Saddam lived in a dangerous neighborhood, I'm sure he wanted his neighbors to think he had truckloads of weapons. BUT, when the CIA could find no evidence of WMDs - their information was quashed and our govt outed a CIA agent in retribution (Valerie Plame) which is treason. It took years for the real truth of the matter to come to light........maybe that's why Clinton didn't rush on in there and hang Saddam......Iraq had nothing to do with 911 - now look at the cluster in Afghanistan that got left to simmer in the meantime.............sheesh......I blame Bush - it wasn't about WMDs (or they wouldn't have hidden the fact there were none) - it was about OIL.
Here are some comments about this
Some comments I read are:
"It can’t be understated what an insult this is to the American People, Sovereign (whether any individual Citizen understands this, flees from the responsibility for this or would change this) over their nation and its government. It is a betrayal, and may, indeed, be treasonous.
It is appropriate that Obama has, in bowing to a foreign potentate in this picture, shown his @ss to the American People; an act that would have been a capital offense had his position been reversed. It would have been inappropriate for him to genuflect before the British monarch, no matter how many neo-Tories there may be among us.
This particular potentate has, among his titles, acknowledgment of his status as keeper of the Holy Places of Islam, and thus singling out Abdullah of the Saudis for such a sign of respect should disturb, deeply, any American left who understands the United States and its history.
It strains credibility to believe someone representing State didn’t tell Obama what constituted a proper stance. He much have overruled that advice, and singled out this particular potentate for this gesture."
Another poster wrote -
I’ve read elsewhere that some people attempt to rationalize this bow-to-the-Saudi-King by Barack Obama as Obama somehow participating in “another country’s protocol” — which is rubbish given the Office that Barack Obama holds (the President of the United States of America bows to no other country, no ruler, to no one — this represents our nation, the U.S.A., as a sovereign nation subservient to no one else, no ruler, no other nation, our nation as a republic unto itself).
These were quotes taken from the second link down on this website.
http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/aggregator.php?sid=1121
Could you possibly be any more bitter and hateful? sm
I see your posts all over. You just posted on the conservative board but didn't have the nerve to put your usual "gt" signature. I have never seen someone so totally consumed with bitterness, rage and, well, just plain ugliness.
posts are vile and hateful
Your posts are vile and hateful..I really truly dont know why you defend Bennetts comments cause they are indefensible..and now we come to this..poverty and crime..this is getting uglier and uglier and I will not respond..
No gt you're never hateful or nasty
don't stand in an open field during a thunderstorm.
Yes, Sam -these people are vicious and hateful.
nm
It IS hateful and it IS totally unnecessary
As a Christian, I personally find it offensive, hateful, rude and totally unnessary.
Hateful because it implies that the atheists or whoever wrote the sign has the handle on "good," as in "just be good for goodness sake." Rude because it implies that people who believe in God are not as smart as they are. Totally UNNECESSARY. No one forces anyone to believe in God and you have NO right to try to ram your nonbelief down my throat. If you want to put a Hannakuh or however you spell it, tree or whatever next to the Nativity scene, fine, that is not offensive. OTH atheists believe in nothing so what the heck are they protesting? Do they also protest every commercian Santa Claus becaue "THEY" don't believe in Santa Claus? This politically correct cr*p has gotten completely out of hand.
It IS hateful and it IS totally unnecessary
As a Christian, I personally find it offensive, hateful, rude and totally unnessary.
Hateful because it implies that the atheists or whoever wrote the sign has the handle on "good," as in "just be good for goodness sake." Rude because it implies that people who believe in God are not as smart as they are. Totally UNNECESSARY. No one forces anyone to believe in God and you have NO right to try to ram your nonbelief down my throat. If you want to put a Hannakuh or however you spell it, tree or whatever next to the Nativity scene, fine, that is not offensive. OTH atheists believe in nothing so what the heck are they protesting? Do they also protest every commercian Santa Claus becaue "THEY" don't believe in Santa Claus? This politically correct cr*p has gotten completely out of hand.
Me too... boo hoo. How I shall miss the hateful left.
nm
Some of the most bitter and hateful people I have
nm
Bitter, hateful and jealous? (sm)
You must be kidding.
Problems that dems have:
8 years of failed economic and foreign policy, a president who ignored the warnings for 9/11 as well as warnings of an economic meltdown, thousands of unnecessary deaths because of a cowboy mentality, war crimes instituted by the highest offices in the US, civil liberties taken away, right of privacy taken away, a barrage of last minute policies that negatively impact the environment, social well-being, and who knows what else. And this is just the tip of the iceburg. We are still paying for all of these actions, not only financially as well as with our country's reputation, but most importantly with lives.
Problems that pubs have:
Obama is the President-Elect and you guys are worried because of rumors about what he MIGHT do.
HMMMMMM..... 
He is extremely hateful. Why would Obama go to
nm
The guy has said a list of hateful garbage.
nm
as said: jealous and hateful losers...nm
nm
LOL ! And you are calling people hateful below??
NM
this is not hateful, it is just an analysis and the truth...nm
I cannot believe the B* that is posted by the Rep on the Politics Board, especially the last 2 days, this has gone INSANE !
|
