hey gourdpainter -- was this a typo or not?

The ex-wife, scorned "pubically" -- was that what you really meant or did you mean publicly?  If so, it's the best typo I've seen all day.  If not, I'm still laughing!

Thanks -- I needed one today!

• Any of you McCain fans read this? - gourdpainter
  • I'm just voting for him because he is the lesser of the two evils who are running for presidency - Wish there was another option
  • You need to read the article again for yourself if... - me
    • McCain Ex - gourdpainter
    • I am voting for someone who has character. nm - geek
      • You are voting for a radical socialist. - sam
      • Well, that certainly means you are NOT - voting for Obama! Show
      • Good for you! Most people would not recognize good...sm - oldtimer
        • Character? Have you done any research at all... - sam
      • McCain - MT advicate
        • McCain - MT Advocate
      • Oh? Is someone new in the running?...nm - old and tired
        • Character - gourdpainter
          • hey gourdpainter -- was this a typo or not? - dem to the end
            • LOL - gourdpainter
            • I think ASR did that! nm - Ivy
  • Sorry, this does nothing to change my mind. - Zville MT
    • Just another thought - gourdpainterg
    • Respect - gourdpainter
      • Obama voted to extend the Patriot Act... - sam
        • Do you think I'm not aware of that??? - gourdpainter
          • Right back at ya. If Obama does win, - sam
            • The problem here, sam is s/m - gourdpainter
            • It is time we have someone speak for the middle - class instead of the rich! I'm tired of the ri
              • Members of Congress get the best healthcare that...sm - geek
                • R U Kidding? - cj
                  • I suggest YOU study up on Obama's plan...sm - geek
                    • I have read his entire plan - cj
                      • Hillary's plan yes, Obama's no. nm - oldtimer
                        • Obama says you can keep your employer health care.... - sam
                          • We already have this plan in my state and it is working very well...sm - geek
              • Democrats ALWAYS, every election cycle.... - sam

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

I should have typed accept instead of except.  Sheesh.  I thing I need another cup of coffee.

but nobody on this board makes them on as grand a scale as you do, several per post, often right in the subject line.  It indicates a lack of respect toward the reader when you cannot be bothered to pay attention, take your time and be accurate (or you are incapable of accuracy, and this casts doubt on the notion that you are an MT).  From someone who claims to possess superior intelligence, this is such a disappointment.  When you address other posters as *stupid* it is just too tempting to point out your numerous typos.

To call the rambling word salad you produce a *style* is a stretch.  It really would help if you'd place your reply directly under the post you are responding to. It is not always clear what you're raving on and on about.  Finally, you might also stop addressing other posters as low-life, cretin, stupid, etc. 

And all the other nay-sayers. 

About the post below concerning the audio interview with Obama on the energy issue, did you even listen to the audio that was presented? 

Not only did I listen to it, I went to the source web site and listened.  Here is the link if you want to check it out further.  http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfgate/detail?blogid=14&entry_id=32228

The entire interview was about 48 minutes long.  It was Obama answering questions from several journalists on a number of issues.  He was first questioned about energy at about 25:15 in the tape.  The issue that was brought up in the post below that you called 'Horsefeathers' was discussed at about 40:30.  I encourage you go listen for yourself and hear the words from the horse's mouth. 

Other issues discussed along with the time markers for each discussion were: 

Health care 10:38
Securities Industry  20:00
Iraq  29:18
Environment  39:55
Racial issues  42:24  (And this was a listener/reader question)
Voting system in the caucuses (sp):  46:09

Obama is, without doubt, a very intelligent man and eloquent speaker, but I fear he may be far too intelligent, possibly to the point that he cannot be reigned in if necessary, and that in combination with a Democratic House, Senate and Judiciary branch makes him a very dangerous man. 

Somewhere down below I posted things I  had AGAINST Obama.  Sam replied.  Now I can't find the thread........typical for this old-timer.

Sam, I noticed a lot of "McCain says" and "McCain calls for" in your reply.  I say both candidates "say" and "call for."  Let's reason here together.  After his 25 years in the Congress do you think McCain doesn't have cronies in Congress and on Wall Street?  Do you think he isn't indebted to monied people in Arizona?  Likewise, Obama, do you think he doesn't have cronies in Congress and Wall Street AND in Chicago?   Well...news flash.  Sure he does.  Do you REALLY think either candidate, regardless of what they "call for" in pre-election propaganda are really going to do anything to benefit the common working class Americans?  I certainly do not.

I just finished reading the Wall Street report this morning and you know what I think?  I think everyone had better get out their Bible and have a read of Revelations whether they want to honor it as God's Word or just history.  It's all there as well as the end result.  Yep, I think we had all better turn to God.  He said if we would turn to Him he would deliver us and I believe HE is our only hope.  Otherwise, what I see is China forclosing on our huge national debt and then skip the socialism, we'll go directly to communism and we won't pass go and we CERTAINLY won't collect $200. Another good read might be the fall of the Roman Empire.

I can't believe I'm still wasting my time railing about the state of this countries ills.  No one will see that it is not DEMOCRATS or REPUBLICANS that are at the root of the problems, it's the AMERICAN people who can't get past party affiliation.  No change will come until the American PEOPLE make it come.

I don't really think Obama is going to come right out and admit that he is friends with Ayers - that would spell disaster for his campaign and plans.  I have learned I cannot trust what is fed to me, so I watch all of the stations, including Fox, and I read through tons of information on the internet and make up my own mind instead of letting the media make it up for me. 

I will tell you, when this campaign first started, I was so excited to hear what he had to say about the issues and to think he has young kids, etc., etc., but the more I have researched (just facts with proof), I have decided that I cannot vote for this man.  He is not who I believe will take America forward.  His policies most definitely I don't agree with but I cannot accept a man whose character is questionable. 

employees getting better benefits when the union employees do.  My husband works for the state and although he is not union eligible (middle management), his work class follows the same policy as the union employees.  If the union employees get a raise or a benefit change, he gets the same. 

My husband, however, is not protected by the union should any situations arise.  I call him a "tagalong".