display--typo nm

• GOP in shambles - sm
  • I think you're right, up to a point. - TechSupport
    • I don't think they lost thier sense of direction...(sm) - Just the big bad
    • Dems Arrogant? - Just ignore TT management posts
      • You could be right. The pendulum swings - both ways.
  • You are so right, and the longer more the denial goes on . . . . - :)
    • So, you don't believe in democracy either? - Backwards typist
      • Apparently they don't - Old part-timer
        • First of all, I never implied that there should be only one system s/m - :)
          • I don't think you implied - A.Nonymous
          • Can you be more specific, please? - TechSupport
            • Evangelicals running the party? - What a hoot!
          • I made a statement on your posting. - Backwards typist
          • Just one more example of that TOLERANCE liberals claim to disply... - Kendra
            • display--typo nm - Kendra
          • Maybe it would be wise... - Old part-timer
          • The president SAID - sbMT
            • You mean like all the "words" Bush . . . - :)
              • You shouldn't a-s-s-u-m-e - sbMT
              • You seem to be under the mistaken impression that... - Kendra
    • Whoops, I mean the longer their denial . . . . - :)

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Ann Coulter on the View today.  Need I go on?  She accused Barbara Walters (Jewish) of reading aloud a passage of AC's new book as if she were reading Mein Kampf. She then over-talked every statement the other panelists made.

There is no reason to have such a person featured on network TV.  Her views have no value.  Her demeanor is surly and disrespectful.  I blame the dullards of this country for being receptive to such "entertainment."  I don't believe the programs showcase her for any other reason than controversy and ratings.  I'm talking to you, National Enquirer readers.

Ann Coulter on the View today.  Need I go on?  She accused Barbara Walters (Jewish) of reading aloud a passage of AC's new book as if she were reading Mein Kampf. She then over-talked every statement the other panelists made.

There is no reason to have such a person featured on network TV.  Her views have no value.  Her demeanor is surly and disrespectful.  I blame the dullards of this country for being receptive to such "entertainment."  I don't believe the programs showcase her for any other reason than controversy and ratings.  I'm talking to you, National Enquirer readers.

The ex-wife, scorned "pubically" -- was that what you really meant or did you mean publicly?  If so, it's the best typo I've seen all day.  If not, I'm still laughing!

Thanks -- I needed one today!

I should have typed accept instead of except.  Sheesh.  I thing I need another cup of coffee.

but nobody on this board makes them on as grand a scale as you do, several per post, often right in the subject line.  It indicates a lack of respect toward the reader when you cannot be bothered to pay attention, take your time and be accurate (or you are incapable of accuracy, and this casts doubt on the notion that you are an MT).  From someone who claims to possess superior intelligence, this is such a disappointment.  When you address other posters as *stupid* it is just too tempting to point out your numerous typos.

To call the rambling word salad you produce a *style* is a stretch.  It really would help if you'd place your reply directly under the post you are responding to. It is not always clear what you're raving on and on about.  Finally, you might also stop addressing other posters as low-life, cretin, stupid, etc.