Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

You threw that all together, not me......

Posted By: sm on 2009-05-29
In Reply to: wait one minute - cj

I just made the point the word "homosexual" never has to be brought up. You teach your children not to act inappropriately......... period!

No need for any particular lifestyle to be brought in to the picture at all....

and you know it!

But since you're so hell bent on teaching our children what is right and what is wrong by the school system, why don't we gather all the homosexual children together and teach them they have to show the same appropriate behavior...... no name calling, bullying, etc.... there are plenty of them that do the exact same thing.... lets not forget that either.

I know, how bout we teach homosexual children that they have to be tolerant of the fact that not all other children will think "homosexuality" is okay and they have to be tolerant of that?

We could just keep going around and around couldn't we?


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

I think I just threw up a little
Where are we supposed to get that money?
Hey Einstein they threw out a Republican too
kind of blows your theory out of the water that they throw out just people who don't agree with Bush policies. No, it's not a law but Capitol guidelines for proper attire. Just like I don't have governmental laws telling me I can't throw people I don't like out of my house I still can because I have guidelines for what is acceptable in my house. Everyone knows what Cindy was there for and it was to protest. There was no other reason for her to be there, period. Like the poster below said...catch up. This story is soooo last week like Cindy soooo overexposed.
I don't see anything to indicate McCain threw a tantrum...
but don't blame him for canceling. The interview was supposed to be about the #1, not the #2. And I think Tucker Bounds did a fine job. Campbell Brown did say, "I'll give it to you, Tucker baby." He wasn't intimidated that I could see. It was a pretty dumb question anyway. How would Tucker Bounds know what orders she had given to the Alaskan National Guard? And she said something pretty ridiculous...that the Alaskan governor would not deploy the national guard, Petraeus would. Uh...no. He might ask for them, but the governor has to deploy them.

Much ado about nothing, other than McCain standing on principle and not honoring one of their reporters trying to ramrod his campaign on the guise of talking about McCain and Obama and instead jumping on Palin.

As to Obama not going on O'Reilly...his handlers won't let him. He could not handle a strong interview. Hillary went, and Hillary did a good job. They don't want the contrast.
I wonder why he never threw his shoes at Saddam!
xx
The post says ENGLAND threw out
//