Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

You mean we wont be hearing, "war is hard work...we're making progress," etc? sm

Posted By: Democrat on 2006-03-17
In Reply to: Bush gets new speechwriter - sm - Starcat

Out with the old BS and in with the new. This should be interesting.


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

Are you illiterate, dyslexic, have ADHD or hard of hearing?
The question is about republicans and taking personal responsibility. The issue at hand in this thread is the Troopergate investigation and the McCain campaign's attempt to slay the messenger, claim bias and shift responsibility to Obama's camp. No where in there did anybody say anything about Barack Obama, his associations, terrorists or anything remotely related to republican hate mantra.

Sarah Palin was up to her eyeballs in this investigation for ethics violatins before McCain's VP pick announcement. The investigation was conducted in accordance with Alaska State Legislature protocol. They were holding hearings, presenting evidence, hearing arguments pro and con, questioning, examining and drawing conclusions aimed at an official response. This is how the State of Alaska conduct legitimate inquiries into allegations of misconduct. There was nothing covert about it. It was all above board. These are the facts, not the spin.

What they discovered led them to the conclusions found in that report. The report findings raise all kinds of other legitimate issues with regard to Paiin and her own past record of conducting ethics investigations aimed at her personal political detractors against whom she sought to exact revenge and her hypocritical position as McC campaign attack-dog-in-chief assigned to head up the Obama smear fest / hate machine.

There is more on this subject which I will post directly below about pubs who abuse power. I am wondering if you can help me understand the McC campaign statement that came out last night that tried unsuccessfully to accuse the Obama campaign for Palin's Troopergate woes.

If you are able, please stay on task and answer my question directly. Sarah Palin has been found to be in violation of Alaska State Ethics law all by her own ill-advised actions and exercising her very own poor judgment. How pray tell is Obama responsible for Palin's screw up? Keep in that we are not attacking Obama here. We are having straightforward dialog about Sarah Palin and the McC campaign's attempt deny her culpability in official finding of ethic violations. Please confine your response to the subject at hand.

I work hard and get no help from anybody.
nm
I'm not willing to sacrifice all the hard work

my husband and I put in over the years to get where we are (finally living half decently) just to give it to people who don't deserve it. Those who deserve help, hey, I'm willing to help, but those who don't contribute, they can go down the tubes for all I care.


Bash all you want, but that's how I feel, and I know there are plenty of Americans who also feel this way.


Must also be hard for some people to give direct answers after making a statement like that.
nm
Our hard work shouldn't go to support those
who want nothing but a handout. As I stated before, I have no problem paying taxes, I just don't want to hand it over to the likes of those who won't help themselves, live in debt because of foolish choices, don't have a clue how to save money and then cry and whine when their choices bite them in the behind. These are some of the same people who get thousands back from the IRS each year and instead of saving it, blow it all on some material item they think they deserve, all the while forgetting the fact that the money they get back every year is their own, they had too much taken out of their paycheck each week, while the gov't was making the interest off of it. I'm sure you'll come back with some snappy reply that will just reinforce the attitude that you have. Sorry you can't quite grasp the concept of not wanting to pay more in taxes.
It's called hard work and get off your butt
@
Yet another selective liberal mind, hard at work...(sm)
You seriously don't remember all the hoopla about Obama quotes from his books that were played over and over, that surely stand alone...and yet, according to his ardent followers, were taken out of context.

You seriously don't remember his remarks about Pennsylvania gun owners and religion?


Oh wait, these don't count. They were....taken out of context. He didn't mean what they say he meant.


However....when it's done to a conservative (Rush), he's, well....all those things the previous poster said he was....god forbid you should listen to the rest of what he says, and why.....his comments stand alone......





Yeah, and little motivation left to work hard or earn
nm
JM may be planning but we're not hearing about it
Every day in the news is talk of Obama's $2M party.
Sorry, but we're sick of hearing about your Sarah phobia and hatred. nm

And we're sick of hearing about your Barack phobia and hatred
You betcha!
This is a kid you're making fun of
Why does this upset you so? If a student had taped a pro-Bush student would you be making fun of him? I highly doubt it. This kid was concerned that he was being continually being taught a particular political viewpoint in geography class. It happened more than once. I think the kid showed a lot of courage--it wouldn't have mattered to me what his political persuasion was. He should been learning geography and not subjected to political rants on either side.
You're right. It's hard for an adult to have
a meaningful conversation with dysfunctional children. 
Your're right -- it's hard to argue with . . .

what the CONSTITUTION SAYS!!!!!


You're not making much sense.

You don't seem to realize there's a written record of all your posts for folks to review.  Many of your posts with other folks are quite strange and don't seem to make much sense. 


Well, at least you're having a big laugh.


I know you're both making jokes....
...at Chuckie's expense....

But he has more true intelligence in his little pinkie, than you or I or could even imagine.

He is one of the few original thinkers left in the country...who happens to be a Republican (I think he can be more center of the road also, and is very articulate on both sides, if you ever really stopped to listen to him)....and the dems think that because he is Republican, that he is to be despised.






I hope that isn't how you're making your choice
I don't care who the better speaker, they both scare the you-know-what out of me.  Unfortunately, I don't think all that much of McCain either.  Not a stellar choice of candidates this time around. 
I think you are saying the same thing. No need to argue when you're making the same point...nm
x
You're right. I think our work here is done.
x
We won. We're back to work now....(NM)
x
"War crimes will be prosecuted"...(sm)

Guess who said that? 


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#30464632


"war-happy-pubs"? You are ignorant!
nm
Ooops, didn't work..what happens when you're in a hurry.
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/horsey/print.asp?id=1412
nah, doesn't work...they're still here, and I barely watch anything that's...sm
called entertainment.

They're still here....


If you lose your ability to work, you're gonna need it

Yes, there is a suit in progress now.....
Plaintiff, Philip J. Berg, Esquire [hereinafter “Plaintiff”] files the within Response in Opposition to Defendants, Barack H. Obama [hereinafter “Obama”] and the Democratic National Committee [hereinafter “DNC’] Motion for Protective Order Staying Discovery Pending Decision on Defendants Dispositive Motion

This motion asks for proof of a
you call that progress?
If that is progress, NO THANKS.  I love newt. 
You make a good point, but I think the real credit for African American progress..sm
is education. You can take away all of the social programs you want to, but if there is not progress in education, you still have poverty.
hearing a lot
Reporters do hear a lot. What they don't do is think a lot. A corporation, lobbyist or politican speaks, and they faithfully write it down without ever questioning the truth or intent of the information they've been given (scrunching up your brow to look like you're "asking the tough questions" doesn't count). They're the best transcriptionists in the business!
One of the reasons you are not hearing as much sm
about the Republicans, especially the current administration, is that they have been very effective at almost completely shutting up any voices of dissent. When Clinton was in office we heard about him nonstop.
I'm hearing that a lot today
I've been all over the internet today and everywhere I go I'm seeing woman who feel like McCain is being condescending to women by throwing out this nobody who is ruby red as they come and expecting to get women voters just because of it, especially Hillary followers. These women are insulted and now finally have both feet firmly on the Obama train.
I read this too after hearing that he had...sm
orchestrated the negative ads this last week, now he is saying he disapproves? Maybe this is a tactic to deflect our attention? Very suspicous. Since when does he have a consious?
Well, instead of hearing why don't you read
xx
sick of hearing he was
only 8 years old when Ayers was making bombs. I was about 8 when Charles Manson and his goons killed Sharon Tate and others. I don't feel like sending old Charley a birthday card let alone sitting in his living room or jailcell in his case.As far as I am concerned Ayers should be in jail too!
Actually, what I remember hearing about was ....sm
that it would be like our own personal savings account. I would much rather have that, than have the govt have their hands in my SS pocket, using my SS as they have been doing, and putting the IOU away in a drawer somewhere.

Not sure what his current plan is or if it has changed, but if I get to control my own SS money, I'm all for it.





http://thinkprogress.org/2008/04/17/mccain-social-security/
There is no hearing today.
Your statement here is patently inaccurate. The SC is not taking the case. For the sake of not wasting too much time on this fairy tale, I am posting this article link that can explain that better than I can.
http://news.aol.com/political-machine/2008/12/05/supreme-court-not-considering-obamas-birth-certificate-case/

You will notice that the article clearly states that the merits of the claims will not be heard (essentially because there are no merits).

For an excellent explanation on the Supreme courts porn king/sexually harassing above-the-law judge's motivations for his "lone wolf" move to attempt to shove this nonsense down the throats of his fellow jurists, read this:
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/83953

Here is an excellent article that discussed the underlying pathology of conspiracy theorists:
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/12/05/birth_certificate/

You are mistaken about the timing of this "knowledge." Unfortunately, the citizens of this country learned of this lunacy long before the Nausea or vomiting 4 election. In fact, Berg's lawsuit emerged the minute it became apparent that Hillary was not going to win in the primaries (08/22/2008). Andy Martin's failed action occurred 10/17/2008. Steven Marquis' impotent attempt occurred on 10/18/2008. David Neal's action fell flat on its face 10/24/2008. Your delusional statement about "many people" is a fabrication that I notice you have not backed up with any sort of credible source.

There is no truth to fight for, fool. The conspiracy theorists who are the driving force behind this abomination are scam bags who are picking your pockets to keep this stupidity alive....and you are marching lock-step alongside one another and coughing up.

The rest of the stuff you have included in your post is nothing more that regurgitation of garbage that has been answered at least a thousand times already. My advice to you is not to hold your breath waiting for the SC justices to show the same sort of self-serving interest in usurping clean and legitimate election results as Clarence the porn king Thomas has in these actions. Out of 842 cases in the last 8 years, they have dismissed 782 of them and heard only 60....and not all of those heard succeeded.

If that was true then there would be no hearing
"The Supreme Court does not want to touch this with a 10 foot pole"??????

Hellooooooo, are you keeping up on current events. They are taking this case on. They are listening to the people who have the lawsuits in action. They are demanding that Barry show his original vault BC (which he has sealed so nobody can see it) and he is defying the Supreme Court.

The citizens of this country did not find out about all this stuff until the election was over, and a lot are saying if we knew this back then, we would not have voted for the guy.

It's time to wake up, just because you don't want anything to happen and want your god in there there are others who don't. Others who are fighting to find out the truth.

All they keep saying is "If you are legal and were born in Hawaii SHOW US YOUR CERTIFICATE". He has not done so and he had it (along with school records and other stuff) legally sealed. That speaks volumes in telling the public there is something seriously wrong here.

I myself will wait for the decision of the Supreme Court. BTW, just in case you haven't heard the news, they are meeting about it and listening to the cases. And if a certain number of the justices believe there is validity to it then the electorates will not be allowed to vote until the issue is resolved.
I have been hearing that O plan

of sharing the wealth will put us in the GREAT DEPRESSION just like back when Hoover was in office, exept this time, it will be worse because many more people make more than 100,000 a year than they did years ago.  So basically it will be spreading the wellfare around.


I"m hearing it and why shouldn't they

get money for a bailout? Wall Street and the banks did, but WS and the banks are HOLDING ONTO the money for BONUSES, not to bail themselves out. GM and Chryler need it to KEEP JOBS.


The bailout was wrong in the first place because everyone would want money, but that's the only thing they could come up with at the time. What's done is done but I don't think we ought to keep throwing money out there. NP and Barney Fife are too free with money that's not theirs and they should be thrown out of office. 


I'm tired of hearing about this.

It was brought to a vote and that is that.  We come from a place where it was once taboo to be gay.  You had to hide your sexual orientation.  Now you can go out with your partner and live your life for all to see.  I don't agree with that kind of lifestyle, but they are free to choose what kind of lifestyle they wish to live and who am I to judge.  However, I feel that marriage should be defined as one man and one woman.  To redefine marriage, I think, is wrong.  If they want to be life partners and have a small ceremony joining them in some sort of civil union.....go ahead but marriage should be left alone as a man and a woman.  I am sick and tired of redefining everything to make it politically correct so every minority group is happy.  You can't make everyone happy.  I personally feel that redefining marriage to include marrying anyone whether it be same or opposite sex could be confusing to children in general and I don't agree with it.


I don't have a problem with them protesting their viewpoint, but when I see them rip a cross out of an old woman's hands and stomp on the cross as she was protesting her opinion.....that is just wrong.  First of all, you don't go after an old woman and secondly....she was sharing her opinion just like they were....so don't get mad at us for our opinion because we are entitled to it as well.


I'm tired of hearing about it too.
If gays want to marry, have at it.  I personally don't care what they do.  We had a vote in Arkansas whether to allow unmarried couples to adopt or foster children )meaning gays although it wasn't p.c. to word it exactly that way.  I voted against it as did the majority. I guess it would solve  the abortion issue over time.  If George marries Carl and Sue marries Edith pretty soon there wouldn't be any unwanted pregnancies, in fact, no pregnancies at all.  Kids imitate what they see, if they have a mother and father BOTH of whom are male or female, what do you think they are going to end up thinking is "normal."  We sure don't need to redefine marriage IMHO.
Where are you hearing this mess? It's
absolutely not true. What, 1 or 2 whackjob republican electorates are nervous about it? LOL.

The BC is a NON-ISSUE, he won by a large margin, and he will be inaugurated. This has all gotten so SILLY.
They obviously are hearing voices.....
their take on the President's speech last night had some pretty funky twists......
Personally....I'm tried of hearing it from
both sides.  I'm tired of the name calling from both sides.  This debate is getting nowhere and yet some of you people just cannot let it go and just agree to disagree.  There will never be a middle ground found on this discussion.  So let's just drop it and stop all the vicious attacks.
First I'm hearing of a divorce. What's your source? And, sm
if her protesting is ending her marriage, there wasn't much there to begin with.


Bush's hearing problem.sm

THE DIAGNOSIS


Maybe it’s the newly appointed speech writer. Maybe Peter Feaver has been locked away in some windowless sub basement of the White House, without access to the outer world. Maybe he can do little more than recycle earlier speeches about the war in Iraq. Maybe he and everyone else in this administration have become trapped in a bizarre and crippling time warp. Or maybe, just maybe, it’s that George Bush is hard of hearing.


That has to be the explanation. After listening to his delirious portrayal of progress today and of victory tomorrow in war-torn Iraq, there is only one conclusion: the President of the Untied States is nothing more than a deaf man, talking.


It’s not as if anyone in this administration has ever listened with a discerning ear.  Standard operating practice at the White House has been to listen only to those who furthered their agenda, and to absolutely no one else.


But this time, the man at the helm of a sinking nation has gone a bit too far. This time he has gone stone, cold, deaf.


George W. Bush and his handlers have a lengthy history of hearing problems.  For more than five years, they selectively closed their ears to those who knew things they chose to ignore. For more than five years, they dismissed the advice of the experienced, and the knowledgeable. They heard nothing that was critical or challenging. They heard nothing that questioned their ill fated policies or their inaccurate conclusions.  They heard nothing but their own applause.


George Bush developed a severe hearing malady early in his presidency. From day one, he turned a deaf ear to warnings that his policies were dangerous and destructive. Fortunately for the administration, the corporate media under-reported or simply ignored the advice of experts with as much disdain as the White House.


Just think about how the President absolutely and intractably refused to listen when:




  • Scientists warned about teaching Intelligent Design


  • Educators warned about serious flaws in No Child Left Behind


  • Environmentalists warned about pollution and global warming


  • Health experts warned about the dangers mercury levels


  • Economists warned about an inquitable tax policy


  • Researchers warned about cutting stem cell projects


  • Ecologists warned about deforestation


  • Engineers warned about New Orleans levees


  • Civil libertarians warned about the Patriot Act


  • AIDS organizations warned about ignoring condom education

And yet, George Bush chose to hear the words of the most extreme voices on the religious right and the most self indulgent arguments of corporate America. His selective hearing set the standard for every one of his regressive and injurious domestic policies.


No matter. George Bush was president and he knew better even without his hearing. He had the answers before the questions were ever raised. He was right. Everyone else was wrong. He had no reason to listen.


It was an outrage for the President and his henchmen to totally ignore the advice and expertise of anyone who disagreed with their self-serving agenda. It was, in effect, an irresponsible surrender to special interests and supporters who would help keep George Bush in power. But, perhaps, it was politics as usual.


Perhaps it was.  Domestic policies often deteriorate into partisan food fights, regardless of the toll on the people at large.


But in the wake of 9/11, George Bush’s hearing took a far more serious turn for the worse. His festering malady became a chronic affliction.  In time, his condition became more and more noticeable and more and more debilitating.


Looking back, we now can see that 9/11 was the prelude to a long planned war against Iraq, When it came to the attacks or to the march to his war, George Bush found himself unable to hear a great many voices.  Once again, the media were cooperative and complicit by selectively underreporting the warnings as well.


Consequently, among the voices that went unheeded by the President were:




  • Intelligence sources who warned about impending attacks on US soil, using hijacked airliners


  • CIA insiders who warned of the increased ‘chatter’ in the summer of 2001 that  signaled that something was brewing among Al Qaeda operatives


  • Families of 9/11 victims who demanded an independent investigation into the attacks


  • Intelligence reports discounting any connection between Saddam  Hussein and Al Qaeda


  • Weapons Inspectors in Iraq who insisted there were no WMD’s, but begged for more time to complete their mission


  • Experts who knew the Middle East and warned that a war against Iraq would foment civil war and instability in the entire region


  • The major nations of the world, with the exception of the UK and the bribed coalition of the billing, who warned about the consequences of an illegal preemptive or preventive war against a non belligerent nation.


  • Millions of people around the world who marched in protest to the impending invasion


  • A bipartisan group of US Military and Diplomatic experts who warned about the recklessness of a war against the people of Iraq


  • The Army War College experts who warned that GW Bus was “…on a course of open-ended and gratuitous conflict with states and non-state entities that pose no serious threat to the United States. 


  • Experienced military men such as Generals Shinzeki and Zinni, who openly criticized the poorly laid plans for invasion and the horrific management of the occupation.


  • Any an all voices in opposition to the Bush/PNAC dream of global domination.

Instead, George Bush listened intently to the words of his PNAC partners who had waited so patiently for the chance to invade Iraq. And yet, he listened to Ahmed Chalabi, a felon convicted of embezzling millions in absentia, who said that an invasion of Iraq would be a cake walk. Instead, he listened to people who had no clue as to the realities of war, or the cultural and tribal entanglements of the Iraqi people.


Instead, he went to war. And the war became a quagmire. And the quagmire became a nightmare. And the nightmare began to show in the polls.


And so, something had to be done.  That something was another series of speeches by the President to shore up support for his war. That is why George Bush came before the American people once again to introduce a redundant and meaningless National Strategy for Victory in Iraq.


When George Bush gave the first of his scheduled speeches, his otic infirmity could no longer be hidden.  Sadly, his second address to the nation simply reinforced the obvious: the President of the United States is completely and totally deaf.


No matter how he tried, there was no way to conceal it.  In his effort to regain public support for his invasion and occupation of Iraq, George Bush made it perfectly clear that he was incapable of hearing anything even remotely related to reality. In order to distort his failed war policy, he turned a deaf ear to the devastation and chaos that define his war of choice. He closed off any and all warnings that a military victory in Iraq is not possible.


But, in a really bad move, he also turned a deaf ear to the American people.


The American people are asking questions, and George Bush refuses to hear them.  Instead, he offers public relations sound bites to a nation that is beginning to demand the truth.


So far he has refused to give the nation any explanations about what is really happening in Iraq. So far, George Bush has refused to address:




  • the failure to plan for our role as occupiers in Iraq


  • the chaos and bloodshed that intensify every day


  • the lack of water and electricity for the people


  • the failure of any significant reconstruction


  • the daily kidnappings and rampant crime


  • the mass exodus of doctors and other professionals


  • the use of torture by both Americans and the new Iraqi regime.


  • the widespread corruption and missing billions


  • the terrible effects of depleted uranium


  • the illegal and devastating use of white phosphorus


  • the fundamentalist government that is now in charge


  • the lack of body and vehicle armor for our troops


  • the tens of thousands of Iraqis who died at his hand


  • the claim by his own man, Ayad Allawi, that things are worse in Iraq now than under Saddam.


  • the five billion dollars a month being spent on the war

And George Bush refused, above all, to present a cohesive and specific strategy for ending the terrible war he began.


People all across this nation wanted to know what went wrong and why. And they wanted to know how their President planned to fix it. But George Bush has closed his ears to the growing concerns of a majority of Americans. He simply refuses to hear them.


He has chosen, instead, to revert to type. He has chosen, instead, to remain deaf to facts that had been revealed about his war.  He has chosen, instead, to ignore the truth about the tragic and deadly catastrophe that was the war in Iraq.  He has chosen, once again, to lie.


George Bush speaks only before courteous audiences.  Assured of applause at appropriate intervals, he can comfortably hold both hands over his ears and refuse to acknowledge that he had led the nation into an endless morass.


He cannot tell the truth, we know that. So he did what he does best. He lied. But, the irony of it all is that more and more Americans are on to the lies by now. Just for starters, they know that:




  • There is no connection whatever between the invasion of Iraq and his trumped up war on terror. And yet, George Bush opted to use the word “terror” FIFTY TIMES his first strategy speech, and continued to the same harangue in the second.  


  • The insurgency in Iraq is composed of dozens, possibly as many as 100 cells working independently. And yet, George Bush identified only three sources of insurgent activity – and placed much of the blame on “the brutal terrorist, Zarqawi – al Qaeda’s leading operative in Iraq.”


  • American marines, not Iraqi security forces, led the incursion into Tal Afar. And yet, to make them appear battle-ready, George Bush gave full credit to the Iraqi security forces for leading the attack.


  • Former supporters of the war, such as Vietnam veteran John Murtha, are convinced that a military victory in Iraq is not possible. And yet, George Bush repeated his old, weathered war cry, “There will be no withdrawal without victory.”


  • General William Odom has called the war in Iraq a failure. And yet, George Bush touts the “amazing progress” of the occupation.


  • More than 2130 Americans and 200 coalition troops have died for his illegal and immoral war of choice, and tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis are dead as well. And yet, George Bush still insists that he has “taken the fight to the terrorists,” and that his bloody war will “lay the foundation of peace for generations to come.”


  • Progress in Iraq cannot be measured by the number of buildings being rebuilt after being destroyed by US bombs. Instead, that is exactly what George Bush insists is so.


  • Progress in Iraq cannot be measured by the number of cell phones being used. And yet, that is how George Bush measures it.


  • Oil revenues are not going to the Iraqi people, but to foreign oil companies.  And yet, George Bush claims that increased oil production was a sign of progress.


  • There is no definable victory possible.  And yet, George Bush insists there is.

But George Bush has no clue about what the public knows. The man is as deaf as a door post. But his impairment is one of choice, not affliction. He believes he can use his hearing loss as a cover for his ineptitude and his obstinacy.  In his world apart from reality, George Bush continues to believe that he can fool all of the people all of the time.


But this time, the American people are not buying it.


THE REMEDY


We are approaching day 1,000 of this outrageous war, and the mood of the nation is changing.  The winds of opposition are gaining strength across the vast expanse that is America. George Bush and his PNAC handlers are pretending not to hear the calls for an end to this terrible war. But they hear it.  They really do.


The turning point, of course, was triggered by Congressman John Murtha, whose opinions can no longer be countered by the usual rhetoric from the White House.  Murtha spoke with the tacit encouragement of his close friends in the Pentagon who cannot speak out personally, but who fully understand the hopelessness of ‘staying the course,’ His message clearly signaled the beginning of the end.


But it won’t be easy.  There will be distractions in the form of token withdrawals, and the war will go on.  More people will die.  The mayhem will continue.   But the voices of protest will get louder and louder.


And George Bush will continue to make speeches.  He will recite the words of his new speech writer with gusto and sincerity.  He will continue to sell his war as if it were a product on the open market.  And he will remain deaf to those who oppose and those who criticize and those who demand that the war must end.


He can do this because the voices of protest are still muted.  They will only be heard if they become loud enough to penetrate the ears of the deaf man who is in charge.  George Bush is the Commander in Chief. He calls the shots.  He sits in the safety of the Oval Office and sends people to their death.


The tragedy is that right this minute, as he still dreams of a glorious victory in Iraq, he doesn’t hear a thing.


Maybe one day soon, before thousands more die, if their outcry is loud enough, George Bush will hear the voices of the people he once swore to serve; then again, maybe not.


Me too...I thought I had lost my hearing or..
my mind, but a while back I started to find myself agreeing with Buchanan as well.  I have put a link at the top of the page that I think is explanatory of this aberration of all kinds of un-like-minded people suddenly (not really, probably more slowly over time) becoming like minded.  I even agreed with Newt Gingrich the other day on a couple of points and what was even more weird, he and Biden were on Meet The Press and saying pretty much the same thing. Myabe there is a silver lining in this fiasco after all; maybe this administration will alienate so many people that we find ourselves banding TOGETHER (what a concept!!!) to try to take our country back and bring it back to the status of  a knowledgeable and compassionate super power who truly have the well being of all its citizens as its first priority and who respect  and appreciate our friends and allies abroad. Anyway...check it out.
I am so sick and tired of hearing...

how republicans are at fault for everything.  Yes, President Bush is republican but don't we have a democrat congress?  What have then done to help better things?


I'm neither republican or democrat.  I always try to pick the person I feel is best for the job.  However, I learned a long time ago that a politician will say almost anything to get elected.  Yes, Obama has many plans, but realistically how many of these plans will actually work, be put into works if he is elected, or just a bunch of smoke he is blowing up our rear ends to get elected. 


I was watching a show on TV the other night that showed politicians during an election year and one of the things consistently brought up by many was the need to decrease our dependency on oil.  This went all the way back to even before Carter was president.  After these politicians were elected, not one of them did anything about decreasing our dependency on oil.  Politicians will bring up any subject worth bringing up during an election year to get the backing of people, but once they win.....they don't have to do half of what they promised to do.


I am hearing on the radio that it was her husband, not she...
who was the member and it was several years ago. The jury is out on that one.

Obama went to the dailykos convention and spoke to them. Does that mean he approves of the smarm on that website?

Wright said God dam* America. Obama was in his pews for 20 years. Are we to attribute that comment to Obama?

You can't have it both ways.
I am sooo sick of hearing...
that Obama will do things "because he's black."  What kind of reasoning is this?  Did we forget that he's just as much white as he is black?  What makes him more black than he is white?  Did anyone notice that he was raised in a white environment, with little contact with his father?  Is he not a product of his environment?  Calling this man black OR white discredits his heritage and does nothing but show the racism that is so obviously alive and well in the US! 
Tax break? I have been hearing we will all be taxed.

I have been hearing on the news, what about the middle class?  Well, we will be taxed.