You're tired of it so you start a thread?
Posted By: Maybe she didn't win cuz she's a ditz. on 2009-04-22
In Reply to: Did you see Hilton's remark about - Miss California. It was horrible.
She said: We live in a land where you can choose same-sex marriage or opposite marriage. And you know what, I think in my country, in my family, I think that I believe that a marriage should be between a man and a woman. No offense to anybody out there, but that's how I was raised. #1 we don't live in a land where you can choose same-sex marriage and #2 how many of you defending this twit are in **opposite marriages**? Maybe she can be Palin's running mate.
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
Then start a thread. No one is stopping you.
nm
Maybe not, but I did not start that part of the thread....
was just replying to it. Sorrreeeee.
gt read an entire thread before you start spouting off
it would save a lot of that foot taste in your mouth and egg on your face.
I never said that the transcript was not Rush's words. What I said was a bunch of bunk and lies was the columnist's comments about Rush and I stand by that. and for your information just because something is posted on the internet does not make it factual or true. Do I really have to point that out to you?
Oh, and BTW I don't agree with Pat Robertson's remarks. I am Christian, but I think Pat R. needs to shut up and retire. He definitely does not speak for all Christians, but again, Cindy Sheehan has said the equivalent about Bush except in much, much more vulgar and hateful language.
Sounds like the tired, old *if you're not
with us, you're against us* crap that Bush has been spewing since invading Iraq. Helen Thomas (or anyone else, for that matter) can easily be totally in favor of the war on terror and AGAINST the war in Iraq simultaneously. There's only one reason the terrorists are becoming so well trained and skilled in their *craft* and that's because of the free training ground that Bush provided them in Iraq. If it wasn't for our invasion of Iraq, they would have never gone there. We should have stayed in Afghanistan and continued to fight the Taliban there. We probably could have found bin Laden by now. Instead, we've created an entire country for them to have free reign, and Bush's distaste for protecting borders in Iraq is apparently as severe as his distaste for protecting borders in America.
Poor Scott McClellan. I really kind of feel sorry for him. Wouldn't surprise me if Bush told him he's got to start playing the by the Bush rules and attack the messenger; hence his assault of Thomas.
I felt bad for him yesterday when he was being asked about Bush's staged video conference with the troops. (I don't think at the time he realized there was an actual video of the *rehearsal* being played on TV.)
I especially felt bad for him yesterday when he accused the press of continuing to bring up Harriet Miers' religion, and that religion has nothing to do with a Supreme Court nomination. However, I felt worse for the press corps, who were flustered when they were precluded from pointing out the it was the PRESIDENT HIMSELF who felt it necessary to use Harriet's religion as about her only qualifying factor for the appointment. Even Robert Bork feels she's incompetent and has said she can't even WRITE well.
The only true statement that Bush could make next is to accuse Fitzgerald of being against the war on terror if he indicts Rove and/or Libby. If they are indicted, it certainly will prove that Fitzgerald is against the war on terror -- the war on terror against CIA agents that's been declared by Rove and Libby and probably Bush himself.
The next week or two will definitely be interesting. 
No YOU don't get it - we're tired of the subject - see message
They lost you won. End of story. Leave the families alone. Didn't you listen to anything Obama said during his campaigning. You want to talk about something the candidates are doing or did fine, that's one thing. But leave the families alone. This goes for Michelle Obama as well as Bristol Palin and her boyfriend.
You don't get it, you really don't. Palin cannot control what her kids do. Yes you can preach anything you want all day long to your kids but in the end kids are going to do whatever they want to do. However in this case her "kid" is an adult and knows fully well what she was doing. I have an aunt and uncle who are extremely involved in their church (they have positions with the head of the church, and go to meeting 3 times a week and Sundays, etc). She goes around town recruiting and teaching abstinence to kids, etc. She sings holy praises of her daughter (17 years old) tells everyone how perfect she is, she follows the path of Jesus, she's responsible, etc, etc, etc. She keeps tabs on her very very very closely (on the cell phone with her every hour wanting to know where she is and what she is doing. Well guess who got pregnant. Miss high and mighty's daughter. I thought well there goes your shot of having the perfect family to display for the church. That was about a year ago. Since then they have had their problems. Do you think I'm sitting here rejoicing that they are going through their periods of grief. No, and its not cos they are relatives because a lot of family's I don't know from their church are facing the same thing and its sad to know what they are going through. I don't care how much disdain one has for someone, to get joy out of watching their families suffer is just really pitiful.
When someone who preaches on the wrong doings of having a relationship before getting married and then their own children end up pregnant (nothing that the parents can prevent), it really brings them back to reality and makes them realize that everyone is human, and I have heard Sara Palin say that in interviews given.
It still astounds me at the force of hatred that people still have for Sarah Palin. I just don't understand it at all. If people didn't like her policies that's one thing, there were those that didn't like Obama's policies either. But the utter disdain and hatred towards her pretty much wishing her dead (not you in particular but others), I just don't get it. I don't hate anyone that much, especially to see anyone in their family going through hard times and grief. But to get such absolute joy from this is just sick. It's the same kind of sickness that people who like to hurt animals will get from doing that.
When McCain and Palin were running for office, I didn't hear too much about the abstinence thing. What I did hear was their plans to help grow business, keep taxes low, and other things to grow the economy. I may have heard her mention teaching kids abstinence once or twice throughout the campaign but that was it. You make it sound like that's all she talked about and it wasn't.
BTW - I didn't know Bristol and her boyfriend/fiance were both living in Sarah's house, and particularly I don't care. I hope they find some happiness and I hope the media will one day leave them alone. Too many other problems going on in the country (i.e. unemployment, people losing homes, people's lives devastated by tornadoes and other natural disasters, people losing their retirements because of decisions WA is making (that is while the politicians in WA paycheck and retirement accounts are growing), thousands of people going hungry and suffering, etc, etc) and this is what people want to keep talking about. How fun and joyful it is that Bristol Palin is going through what she is going through and we should be happy about that because why? It affects Sara Palin and people would like to shove the knife in her back and twist is just a little bit more.
C'mon people - grow up!
Second BTW - I'm not a republican so you don't have to shout it and say you republican. I'm a registered democrat and I voted for the O (yes, I know, I too was scammed by the lies, just glad I've woken up and now listen to common sense people and not the scammers anymore), so I'd really watch who you call a democrat or repbulican. Not all democrats are in support of the annointed one or of what congress/senate/house is doing to our country.
Every thread of yours
0
New thread above.
nm
And, that has what exactly to do with this thread?? SM
BTW it's Western KY University. There is no Southern KY University.
The thread was that someone said he never...
talked about religion. I pointed out that he DOES.
actually this thread is about...
whether the members of military support the effort or not. you turned into something about info available when you claimed that you have more info and a more clear picture than they do and that they are "just following orders" And you are the one who didn't agree with the sentiment of the original post and started the "i don't like people who disagree with me," not dnh, when you started saying you had a clearer picture than they. You are simply out to argue and stir the pot. Not worth the effort to debate with you.
And no actually, if you follow the thread SM
I was posting to American Woman.
I read this whole thread here. sm
MT was very careful to say it was not word for word. Gosh, all the calling people liars. It's terrible. She said it wasn't word for word more than once. How about recalled incorrectly? Liar is a horrible word and I have been called it so many times on these boards for no good reason. Anyway, as I said, I am mixed race and I am not offended. That's all I am going to say because there is no use posting here. Flame away gt. Call me a liar yet again. I really don't care and as Republican said, you don't scare me. I think you are sad and pathetic and I think your life must be very empty to be as hate filled as you are.
This whole thread is stupid!
MT did not say she was going back to Iraq...she was answering a poll!!!! Where's the lie?
The subject in this thread is a cat.
How did we get to this? And is it really necessary to call names? I mean, we are civilized people after all. It's rather hard to understand why you attack someone even when they are AGREEING with you. I try to be respectful here, but it's very hard to communicate when the subject is changed constantly in a thread. Perhaps an I hate Bush and all conservative thread would be best started and all posts to that effect might go there. Nothing is being furthered here except what seems to be a very bad grudge. In a public forum. Really not cool.
Your 1st post in this thread had NOTHING to do
pardon me for being a bit puzzled about why you brought it up.
Dead thread.
nm
The only bash under this thread is
Just can't resist slamming a different perspective, can you? Not even one time is this possible.
awww, don't want to go there so this thread
has ended? "Case closed" I guess.
Have you not read this thread?
Simply stating Christian beliefs. This country, although based on religious freedoms, was founded by Christians. In God We Trust ring a bell?
I'm sorry, it's not me. Wrong thread?
???
let this thread die. The stupidity
of it speaks louder than any response trying to explain things because they don't "understand" They want to keep the subject off the issues.
Sorry, got tripped up in the thread... the ol'
Evidently you are not following your own thread
The rational people are the Obama folks who will not engage in the foolishness of the conspiracy theory to nowhere and the brick wall...well, that would be you, "Everyone should be interested!"
I might have missed that thread but I...
didn't miss the thread of negativity in your posts.
If you are not able to follow my thread,
at least try to follow your own. I was replying to your right-from-wrong post where, in an attempt to avoid the points I had made about Israel, you stated I had listed all of Palestinian atrocities. My reply followed consecutive order.
The first item on the list you were trying to attribute to them began with occupation. Since you made the blanket, all-encompassing statement that I had just listed ALL of their atrocities, I began my reply with occupation and followed point-by-point with responses to the other listed items. You would probably have a vague understanding of that if you actually engaged in debating substance rather than simple vollies of empty, vacuous put-downs and denials.
He sure does have a relevance to this thread
Because your comment was same sex people can't ever have sexual intercourse. The relevance is that Bill Clinton came out on national TV and told the world "I did not have sexual intercourse with that woman...Ms. Lewinski?" Both are bold face lies.
Two woman are perfectly capable of having a sexual relationship as are two men. And that is why we have sperm donors and other means to allow woman the capability of having a child without having sex with a man. Maybe if you got out of the "puritan" mind set you might just even have a little fun. But somehow I doubt that. Reminds me of my aunt telling me that sex is only for pro-creation. Once you don't want to have kids anymore then you shouldn't be having sex anymore. Is this you aunty???????
Maybe you could begin in another thread.
Day of Prayer and the absolute vicious lies about Obama's faith.
Just because you believe he lied about other things does not automatically make him a Muslim.
Patty, just get off this particular thread.
It is very obvious that you are a minority here and you're just trying to stir the pot, as you always do. Nobody wants to hear your bigoted idiotic statements about something you know nothing about, so just keep handling your snakes and leave everybody else's sex life alone. It is none of your business!!
After reading all the posts in this thread,
You definitely won, hands down, no contest because you speak the truth.
(Don't ya just love the word "insufferable?" I think it's used mostly by those "tater" people when they start sputterin' and spoutin' and spittin'!) 
Thank you Dem for adding some saneness to this thread.
While I agree that Bill C. caught flack you have to remember it was for things he lied about and then was proven to have done such as getting a BJ in the chambers of the oval office and then committing the documented crime of perjury by lying about it. If it is solidly proven by investigation that GWB has lied to the country under oath I will raise my white flag and cry uncle, and then all this hatred and uproar will be just. The far left, and I include GT in that group, has gone off the deep end with all this unsubstantiated speculation about this war and GWB. I do not believe Cindy Sheehan is truly honoring the memory of her son by doing what she's done. While she has every right to do it does not mean it is the correct interpretation about how the majority of this country feels nor is it what her son wanted his legacy to be. From the statements of Casey Sheehan his thoughts about this war were entirely different from his Mom's and in large part of the rest of the Sheehan family.
What's missing here is your understanding of this thread....
it is about infants born alive after botched abortions and left to die without care. Partial birth abortion is when they turn the baby around in the womb, let all but the head be born, then stick a needle in base of skull and suck the brain out to collapse the skull and make sure the baby is dead before it comes out, to avoid that pesky being born alive thing that proabortion people so hate.
At least get your facts straight and know what you are denying before you deny it.
And yes, he does support partial birth abortion. He supports removing the ban on that heinous procedure. His wife sent out a campaign letter while he was running for senate in Illinois that said that very thing.
Sheesh.
This whole thread is a vast wasteland of
nm
I'm taking my response to a new thread
nm
This thread is worthwhile for grown ups.
No way, no how can you lay the abysmal Bush/republican response to Katrina at the feet of the DNC, Obama, Biden, Hillary, Bill or the Hope Train, so the best you can do is make a childish joke and dismiss it? You really ae just as cold blooded as your leaders.
Imagine this. It's Monday night, and the opening speaker of the RNC takes his place behind the podium. He is the very same guy that McCain is desperately trying to distance himself from. The media is trying to cover the event AND a category 3, 4 or 5 hurricane, as it makes landfall just west of New Orleans, placing it on the dirty side of the storm.
What will the media do? Perhaps the best they can….they cover the speech and split the screen with streaming video and scenes of the levies bursting at the seams or the FEMA trailers being smashed to smitherines as huge chunks of metal siding are being blown around like sheets of paper, slamming into buildings, trees being uprooted, and cars disappearing under flood waters raging through streets/canals of the city.
Meanwhile, GW is preaching to the choir and singing the praises of the party as he promotes the candidacy of the RNC's best pick. It will not be that easy for the TV viewing audience to block out the image of Bush and McCain eating cake last time around while New Orleans drowns again. So this beg the question….what sort of damage control do you think they can pull out of their magic hats to make it go away?
What a retarded thread...get a life
nm
Exactly, that is the common thread in Democratic...
party these days. And the only way to end that stalemate in Waashington is for that, for lack of a better word...crap to stop. McCain and Palin are reaching across the aisle, saying they are willing to work with democrats to stop the stalemate...country first. McCain says he wants Democrats and Independents in his cabinet. Country first. This election is a no-brainer for this Independent. McCain/Palin.
I think you responded to the wrong thread.
Best post of the thread, Kaydie. nm
Is someone in this thread related to Senator
 Is that his nick name for McCain supporters? Hey how about McCain sell a few of those houses and give it to the financial companies???? How about the rich do something for a change???? How about that????
This makes me sick, all of it! We need to be addressed by these candidates and not set aside until oil companies and rich folks figure out what happened!!!! We are looking at who is going to be our next President and all Bush cares about are his pockets being lined? Poor thing; did he invest in the wrong stock???
I must be really whacked, but I feel this candidacy is waaaaay more important than IGA, IGM, Wash Mut, Bank of America, Lehman, Looman, Dooman, or dooofus, whatever!!!!! These lenders loaned the money to people who they knew couldn't pay it back and now it has come back to bite them and now its the rest of us having to bail them out. No sympathy here! I stayed within my budget; so sorry others did not!!!!!!!! These candidates are going to run this country. I think Obama is right; let's get it on with the debates.... JMO...
have you read the rest of the thread?
Before you start firing off, maybe you should read the thread. In a lot of areas in the US, the wait for access to healthcare is a lot more than 6 weeks.
Also, a lot of folks in the US don't have any kind of insurance, so they would wait a lifetime for a CT.
That was a truly lame comeback to this thread.
nm
Read the thread. It's about a local -
New York's not exactly a swing state.
Not with all the ghetto crack addicts and abortion-loving welfare moms.
Dems all the way, baby!
The facts were given in the links above in the thread nm
really now
Can you not recognize a dead thread
x
Try to follow the thread. OP said he/she was bored....
and felt compelled to post that he/she was bored. I merely said it was boring to read posts about people complaining that they are bored. If you are bored by my posts, don't read them. Simple fix.
How many thread do you need to dominate tonight?
You could post your question down under your newly brought up to the top post and while you are at it, you might consider answering the questions I have been posing to you since lunch time. Otherwise, do you mind if I solicit opinions on this progressive tax table from posters other than yourself?
Sorry Shelly, but the common thread
parental responsibility versus government interference. You folks can't have it both ways. I have no problem, big or otherwise, understanding these concepts, but you, on the other hand, need to take off those blinders. Government interference in responsible parenting applies to both situations in exactly the same context, that being one of expecting laws to act as the eyes, ears and voices of reason for parents on behalf of their children.
What's that you say? Parents don't have time to be with their children while in the library? Huh? If they don't, what makes you think the government sould be held responsible for this?
I'm not interested in straw issues. Rather, I want to see the constitutional ban on government censorship enforced with clenched teeth while parents stop whining and expecting government to do their jobs for them. Government censorship is a steep and slippery slope. I can't think of ANYTHING that poses more of a threat to our democracy than that and am happy to see a deputy AG nominee who understands that.
i call stupid on this whole thread.
Does no one understand that this big stimulus plan comes with massive *tax cuts*? Two hundred eighty-eight billion dollars worth of them? (That's $288,000,000,000)
Follow my logic here: The plan cuts your taxes. So it's just not right to take the cost of the bill, divvy up amongst all the taxpayers, and say, aha, here's how much it raised my taxes--the overwhelming burden of the cost is because it's taking the burden off the taxpayer.
Now, we can debate whether this is the right way to go (it isn't--again, tax cuts aren't terribly effective). But to portray a tax cut as a tax increase is just...well, did I use the word "stupid" too many times already?
(Please note I'm not calling *you* stupid, just the website calculator and the trillions of well-paid pundits and congresspeople who insist that a tax cut is a tax increase, to attempt to resuscitate their dying agenda.)
This thread is about bailing out illegals,
but I don't agree with bailing out the banks and CEOs either.
Youhave to read the whole thread, then you will know what it is all about..nm
nm
As we are tired of YOU!
Why can't you comply with the moderator's request not to bash posts here? If we are so offensive do you, why do you come here other than to stir up trouble?
|
