Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

Yes - and payroll would be cheaper, simpler too.

Posted By: TechSupport on 2009-04-01
In Reply to: GOP Budget & Tax Plan - HomeAlone

Companies incur unbelievable costs trying to handle withholdings properly. Now, imagine that you've got just two numbers to deal with - 10% or 25%. The savings would be very significant.

I'm surprised by the 10% rate, however. I had always heard from proponents of the flat tax that it would have to be more like 17-20% to keep the government running (even before the government became even more bloated). Of course, they were talking about the same rate for everyone, not a two-tiered system like this, so perhaps the 25% bracket makes up the difference.


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

I will try to put it simpler for you.
We have put a lot of faith in our government because our economy was booming.  Now our economy is not doing so well.  We put our faith in the government and it let us down.  Obama wants bigger government.  Why would we want bigger government when government has failed us.  The bigger government is, the more power we give it to control out lives.  Obama wants to take away a person's right to have a gun.  You take away our guns and we won't have anything to defend ourselves with.  In the past dictators have taken away weapons from people so we have nothing to fight back with.  Here Obama wants to take away our guns.  You do the math.
Yes, it would be simpler as it would be a very very short list!
nm
He was still on the payroll until

You need to be on someone's payroll
as a lobbyist! Maybe Ms. Pelosi would be interested, she might use some help with her mice project.
Wouldn't it be simpler if they listed truths? LOL
 
He is not on their payroll that I am aware of....
there are many people who "work for the campaign" who are not paid members of the campaign. I have never heard Fox or any other network say he was a paid member of the McCain campaign. I said he was working on behalf of the campaign...so am I, but they aren't paying me either. Big difference. I don't think, and have seen no indication, the Rove will be a member of a McCain administration.
I understand the payroll tax on only over $250K....sm
I understand I won't pay more payroll tax and income tax at our low income, but it's the property taxes, fuel taxes, sales taxes, and capital gains taxes that are going to go up too, and being landowners and ranchers raising livestock, those taxes affect us big time and just add to the cost of our business, which already is hard to make a profit on.

I know it's hard for people whose income is from a job where you go to work and bring home a paycheck and taxes are simple to understand. But running a business isn't just about how much comes out of your paycheck for payroll tax and what you pay for income tax once a year. These corporate taxes he's talking about are going to affect so many small businesses because most of them make between $500,000-$1,000,000 a year, and increasing their tax rates is going to kill them. It's going to cause them to lay off employees, raise their prices, or simply close their doors.

I have several family members with mom-and-pop business in small towns from a beauty salon to a restaurant and a small computer fix-it business and they will really be hurt by this. They can't raise their prices because people in their small town can't afford to pay higher prices.

There are a lot of big farmers in our area who easily make over $250,000 a year, but what people don't realize is that probably 90-95% of what they sell their crops for has to go into planting and harvesting those crops and they have little to actually live on to pay their heating and food bills, etc., when it's all said and done, so where are they going to come up with the extra tax money?

By sticking it to the big corporate business, there's going to be a lot of collateral damage in the wake and those are going to be the small to mid-sized business of our friends and family. They need to raise the amount to 1-2 million or something because this is going to kill small town main street. JMHO
That's even better, cheaper, and should be
.
Well, everything was cheaper then, too
We didn't have $4-5 gallon gas then, heating bills were cheaper, in turn everything else was cheaper. I think the problem was my income didn't go up but everything else did. BTW, east coast here.
Cheaper plans -- $107 to $220
There are cheaper plans for the child, just checked and they range from 107 with 1000 deductible up to 220 for HMO.  I had to go without health insurance for a long while after getting divorced and getting my life back together, did not ask the government to come in and save me and at an older age, have a lot more chance of medical problems than young kids.  When I was a kid there was no health insurance, hardly went to the doctor.  I just feel that middle income people (over 80,000) can afford to support their kids with insurance.  Do not carry it on yourself and cover your kids if you feel so adamant about it.  And as for the cigarette tax covering it, once they find out the administation cost of it, then they will have to tax the rest of us to fund it.  Also every government plan starts out great and then they cut the benefits to the doctors as they don't have the money and pretty soon there are no doctors that will accept those patients.  Seen it time and time again.   But like someone else said, give a credit to the family once they pay the premiums for their kids.   Government taking care of us is not the answer, at least to me it isn't.
Wouldn't it just be cheaper to
donate condoms to them and tell them to use them?  I mean....I think a condom is cheaper than an abortion. 
It would be cheaper than smuggling it........LOL
^^
Foreign cars are not better or cheaper.

If they are cheaper it is because they are literally that....cheaper cars.  You pay for what you get.  I've seen so many American made cars throughout my family where they have put 200,000+ miles on vehicles and they keep going.  I've driven so many different types of vehicles since my husband runs a car dealership and I have to say that American trumps foreign any day in my opinion.  I will NEVER own a foreign car.  Ain't happenin.  You will more than likely see my happy butt in a Chevy of some type.  I'm currently driving a Chevy Uplander and I friggin LOVE it!  I have no problem telling someone their vehicle is a foreign piece of crap.  In fact, I recently told my best friend's sister that was what her Honda was.  LOL!


Sure they're cheaper. But shouldn't there be
.
Wrong! He gets away with paying cheaper wages

Joe is looking out for Joe, not Bob, Bill, and Brad who are looking for a "good job."  Joe will help Joe if he's making that much, believe you me!