Yeah, he has extended the timeline, but......(sm)

at least there is a timeline.  That means there is a light at the end of the tunnel.  Would you prefer that our troops go without funding in the meantime just to prove a point?  That's what the GOP is doing.  They are going on with that tit-for-tat war, being the party of no, just to oppose anything Obama does, with no regard whatsoever to the needs of our military. 

• Here's a question....(sm) - Just the big bad
  • And all this time I thought you were - Trigger Happy
  • Unpatriotic. - Zville MT
  • Smart? (just kidding) nm - Backwards typist
  • Maybe an even better question.......sm - m
    • because the situation OVER THERE CHANGED, - ()
      • 'over there', everything is interwovn, intermingled, intertwined, no borders!..nm - ()
      • What on earth does the Taliban in Pakistan.... - watcher
        • When he said we do not belong there he was - talking about Iraq (SM)
          • From **Stars and Stripes** Obama: Taking the fight - to Afghanistan.
        • Bin Ladern is still wandering around in t - ()
        • I throw it right back at you: Blind, in denial, naive, conservative pub...nm - ()
    • Yeah, he has extended the timeline, but......(sm) - Just the big bad
      • No, that's not it.........it's called lying, like so many others - promises he made! Please!!! nm
      • There is no timeline - just me
        • Just me: Hahaha! You are saying..............sm - ()
        • Well, there is a timeline of sorts.... - watcher
        • There is a time line. It was agreed - Backwards typist
          • Sorry my message was not clearer. - just me
          • I think it was last August ..sm - E.
            • Exactly! nm - watcher
        • Please note....(sm) - Just the big bad
          • Yikes, jtbb..... - watcher
            • And if one wants to split a rather large hair.... - watcher
          • Not to antagonize but... - E.

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

That's exactly what I said.  Scarborough has always supported Bush.  There is a difference between supporting and blindly following.  For example, you see nothing wrong with how this case was handled.  You see nothing wrong with Bush lying every time he opens his mouth.  That's blind faith.

Scarborough is an objective Republican who believes in honesty.  I realize this is a difficult concept for some CONS to understand.  Once upon a time, honesty was considered a good thing in the United States.  People who were honest were considered to have moral character and integrity.  Scarborough is one of those rare of Republicans, totally foreign to you, I'm sure.

To blindly follow (which I'm sure you're quite familiar with) means worshiping a man as if he's some kind of god, believing every single word he says, even when you see evidence to the contrary right before your eyes.   He lies every day; those who follow blindly believe him every day.  And when it becomes common knowledge that he's lied and when they can't twist and manipulate the lie out of recognition any more, then his blind followers make excuses for him, usually blaming democrats or anyone else who is handy but never blaming the liar himself.  And they justify all the lying because they have that special *connection* with God.  They can lie all they want and God just winks at them and says it's okay because their place in heaven has already been guaranteed, unlike the rest of us poor slobs out there without that special connection.

The only thing that scares me more than Bush having the same credibility as Al Qaeda is the fact that there are so many morons who blindly follow him, who just aren't smart enough to figure out that Bush was never on their side - he's only on the side of big money.  He even joked about his *base* - the *haves* and the *have nots.*

By the way, you are on the liberal board.  If you don't care for the liberal point of view, the CON board is ---->

I was responding to this:  *And know a lot PK. I know A LOT about your posting habits more than you could ever imagine.*  I was accused of doing something I simply didn't do, so that just shows me how much you people really DO know, and, yes, I can *imagine* a LOT when faced with this kind of ominous post. 

Those of your ilk have dark histories of murdering people of different beliefs (for example, personnel at abortion clinics), and the latest tactic of the Neocons is intimidation and retribution.  Just ask Valerie Plame, who used to have a career before her husband spoke the truth.

If someone said that to you on your board, you'd be accusing them of threatening to assassinate you and contacting the FBI.  Who are you KIDDING?  Typical neocon double standard and hypocrisy at work again. 

but the point is, the far left hates Cheney as much or more than Bush, so impeach Bush, get Cheney, then what?  Impeach Cheney?  Then you get Hastert. I know the far left doesn't like him. Impeach him and get Ted Stevens.  He's a Republican, too.  (President pro tempore of the Senate).  Impeach him and get...Condi Rice...if she isn't buying shoes.  What have you gained. Absolutely nothing. Well...maybe some payback for Clinton, which is what this is all about anyway.  Why not just wait until 2008 and vote the bums out.