Yeah, he could have had dinner before or after

• Skipped the speech? Turns out O took Michelle out - for early private B-day dinner. sm
  • Can you be any more disrespectful - Just me
    • I am not surprised. Obama represents the rude left - quite well. Bad taste and little respect for other
      • You must have missed the reports about - jj
    • To not attend? You had to be invited to attend - - Amanda
      • Besides Bush, he's the next man that everyone is watching - Hellooooooo?????? That wasn't the point
    • No more than the bad taste you are displaying being so nitpickey over this matter..funny you didn - woofer
      • No bad taste would be - Just me
      • and I dont' find that bad- - Amanda
        • Not true. - Marmann
        • As noted previously...(sm) - Just the big bad
    • Being from Texas, I've had an extra 5 years - of his drool...
    • No danger of no shows. Media coverage alone - will span 4 day, so
    • Evidently, Cheney doesn't agree...NODDED OFF during the drivel - and it was only 8 minutes long! sm
      • HA HA HA HA - see message - Just me
        • Sorry. No sale. - The shrub earned his just dues. sm
          • You are so right, and as soon as - Obama does something
            • What I'm happy about is - sm
              • Well said! - Marmann
  • Refreshing to see he loves his wife, and isn't - afraid to show it. Bush is all but history now.
    • Well, gee. I think Bush loves his wife too. - This is getting ridiculous. Petty junk.nm
      • Sorry. I have to agree with the OP. - It IS refreshing to SEE (sm)
        • No, this is ridiculous. But out of respect, Obama - does appear disrespectful.nm
          • Yeah, he could have had dinner before or after - the speech. No reasonable excuse...and dumb.nm
            • Why? So you could turn around and - sm

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

and chianti to reply.  What's happening in the market is called a hiccup.  It will jump a little, drop a little, and bounce around.  It does that when a president has a colonoscopy or gets a mole removed. 

I would not start singing Ding-Dong the Witch is Dead quite yet (am I mixing movie metaphors?) because I think the overall trend will be gradually down over the long term.  Let's see what a 6-month average has been in, say, September?  (Now might be a really good time to divest....just sayin')

Did anyone else see this?  Thank you Colbert, I am now a fan. 

http://video.freevideoblog.com/video/AAC7FA18-2DDC-4D3E-B1BB-9D6CBD83E27F.htm

That's exactly what I said.  Scarborough has always supported Bush.  There is a difference between supporting and blindly following.  For example, you see nothing wrong with how this case was handled.  You see nothing wrong with Bush lying every time he opens his mouth.  That's blind faith.

Scarborough is an objective Republican who believes in honesty.  I realize this is a difficult concept for some CONS to understand.  Once upon a time, honesty was considered a good thing in the United States.  People who were honest were considered to have moral character and integrity.  Scarborough is one of those rare of Republicans, totally foreign to you, I'm sure.

To blindly follow (which I'm sure you're quite familiar with) means worshiping a man as if he's some kind of god, believing every single word he says, even when you see evidence to the contrary right before your eyes.   He lies every day; those who follow blindly believe him every day.  And when it becomes common knowledge that he's lied and when they can't twist and manipulate the lie out of recognition any more, then his blind followers make excuses for him, usually blaming democrats or anyone else who is handy but never blaming the liar himself.  And they justify all the lying because they have that special *connection* with God.  They can lie all they want and God just winks at them and says it's okay because their place in heaven has already been guaranteed, unlike the rest of us poor slobs out there without that special connection.

The only thing that scares me more than Bush having the same credibility as Al Qaeda is the fact that there are so many morons who blindly follow him, who just aren't smart enough to figure out that Bush was never on their side - he's only on the side of big money.  He even joked about his *base* - the *haves* and the *have nots.*

By the way, you are on the liberal board.  If you don't care for the liberal point of view, the CON board is ---->

I was responding to this:  *And know a lot PK. I know A LOT about your posting habits more than you could ever imagine.*  I was accused of doing something I simply didn't do, so that just shows me how much you people really DO know, and, yes, I can *imagine* a LOT when faced with this kind of ominous post. 

Those of your ilk have dark histories of murdering people of different beliefs (for example, personnel at abortion clinics), and the latest tactic of the Neocons is intimidation and retribution.  Just ask Valerie Plame, who used to have a career before her husband spoke the truth.

If someone said that to you on your board, you'd be accusing them of threatening to assassinate you and contacting the FBI.  Who are you KIDDING?  Typical neocon double standard and hypocrisy at work again. 

but the point is, the far left hates Cheney as much or more than Bush, so impeach Bush, get Cheney, then what?  Impeach Cheney?  Then you get Hastert. I know the far left doesn't like him. Impeach him and get Ted Stevens.  He's a Republican, too.  (President pro tempore of the Senate).  Impeach him and get...Condi Rice...if she isn't buying shoes.  What have you gained. Absolutely nothing. Well...maybe some payback for Clinton, which is what this is all about anyway.  Why not just wait until 2008 and vote the bums out.