Yeah, because he provided SO MUCH

• Will Obama be judged differently because he's black? - sm
  • He already has been subject to a different - maggie
    • A flawless campaign...are ya kidding me? - Chele
      • Said he had lots of money, I know I gave as much as I could. - Reader
      • She did not say FLAWLESS - Little or no problems
        • Okay....so the word "flawless" was - Chele
  • I think it is perfectly clear - Chele
  • He most certainly will be judged differently -- less harshly! - Lu
    • I think you are wrong - - Amanda
    • Did you intentionally call the President - of the United States
      • I am Obama girl and I think she meant - Reader
      • I did not intentionally call Obama "it." I'm not sure why I typed "it" - Lu
        • Yeah sure you did. - Uh huh. Yep.
        • Perhaps it was a freudian slip... - ???
  • Really good post, we all know he will be under a magnifying glass, and all his motives and ideals,,, - Cyndiee
    • O scares the heck out of me. Not because of race - Because he has almost NO experience! nm
      • who has experience being the President? nm - Amanda
        • Very funny. NOT! Executive experience! - and glad Bush kept us safe from 9/11 til now!.nm
          • Do you even believe that statement, seriously? There are unclassified documents from FBI/CIA where - Cyndiee
          • Bush Kept us Safe? - Now THAT IS Funny!
            • I read plenty, thank you. History will prove your - extremely biased left wing opinion wrong.nm
              • Might as well not waste time talking to the haters. - -like talking to Joy Behar! yuck.nm
        • I DO. - LOL. No message below.
      • Bush's Exit speech was REALLY scary - MT
      • And George showed SO MUCH experience and wisdom when he first took office, right?????....sm - Cyndiee
        • Yes. President's first job is Natl Security. - Trust Obama?? uhh.. no. nm
          • And Bush failed that first test. - Because of him we were attacked.
        • When is everyone going to............... sm - m
          • It will probably take the same - amount of time
          • what needs to be defended? nm - Amanda
            • To those who understand............ sm - m
              • Try me - - Amanda
              • Even quoting the New Testament here will not defend the horrifying tragedy what was the Bush adminis - Cyndiee
                • Not sure what Bible you are reading........... sm - m
                  • I read the one only true Testament of our Lord Jesus Christ, who was infallible Lord....sm - Cyndiee
                    • You read ancient Greek? That is - awesome.
                      • Wow, you have just proven my point with such a nasty slam, you knew exactly that I was referring to - Cyndiee
            • Exactly, Amanda! - Smoke and Mirrors
          • I am responding to all the posters who have made a living on this board denegrating everything that - Cyndiee
            • Bush kept us safe after 9-11. Economy was great - til dems took over 2 years ago.nm
              • You have that completely backwards, it was President Clinton's administration that had a balance - Cyndiee
              • Yeah, it is so easy to bash Bush, but say one little - thing about Obama -labeled a racist.nm
                • Yeah, because he provided SO MUCH - MQQA
                • George Bush HIMSELF makes it so easy to make fun of George Bush!!!! oh where would I start, so litt - Cyndiee
                  • Cyndiee, I think you need to read your own - sm
                    • And I think you have to read all of my posts, I am responding to arrogant inflammatory remarks, whic - Cyndiee

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

into your browser and click "go," the page will come up with the entire article.  If you scroll down a bit, you will see the video screen which will work if you click on it.

I just tried it, and it works fine.  I will try again to post the link below under "URL/Link." 

I personally believe that your husband and all other soldiers who are placed in harm's way deserve so much better, whether it's safe food/water, safe electricity, better vehicles to protect them against IEDs, etc.  They are doing their best for us, and they deserve the best FROM us, IMHO.

originated, I believe, during FDR's New Deal.  When wages were capped, employers found a way to circumvent this by providing ''sickness insurance'' for their employees, thus giving them a raise without violating the wage caps. 

Another example of government meddling.  Had they not imposed wage caps, employers would have been able to keep paying their employees and give raises to enable them to afford their own healthcare.  But instead, we grew the employer-provided healthcare system we have now and people experience ''job lock,'' unable to move to another employer because of pre-existing conditions which may not be covered by a new company's insurance plan. 

Of course it's income, always has been.  Same as use of a company car, or executive housing provided by a company (both of which are taxable to the extent they are used outside of actual business activities.)   I'm amazed nobody until now has taxed insurance.

Does this constitute a new tax on people earning under $250 thousand (or $235 thousand, or whatever the new number is?) 

That's exactly what I said.  Scarborough has always supported Bush.  There is a difference between supporting and blindly following.  For example, you see nothing wrong with how this case was handled.  You see nothing wrong with Bush lying every time he opens his mouth.  That's blind faith.

Scarborough is an objective Republican who believes in honesty.  I realize this is a difficult concept for some CONS to understand.  Once upon a time, honesty was considered a good thing in the United States.  People who were honest were considered to have moral character and integrity.  Scarborough is one of those rare of Republicans, totally foreign to you, I'm sure.

To blindly follow (which I'm sure you're quite familiar with) means worshiping a man as if he's some kind of god, believing every single word he says, even when you see evidence to the contrary right before your eyes.   He lies every day; those who follow blindly believe him every day.  And when it becomes common knowledge that he's lied and when they can't twist and manipulate the lie out of recognition any more, then his blind followers make excuses for him, usually blaming democrats or anyone else who is handy but never blaming the liar himself.  And they justify all the lying because they have that special *connection* with God.  They can lie all they want and God just winks at them and says it's okay because their place in heaven has already been guaranteed, unlike the rest of us poor slobs out there without that special connection.

The only thing that scares me more than Bush having the same credibility as Al Qaeda is the fact that there are so many morons who blindly follow him, who just aren't smart enough to figure out that Bush was never on their side - he's only on the side of big money.  He even joked about his *base* - the *haves* and the *have nots.*

By the way, you are on the liberal board.  If you don't care for the liberal point of view, the CON board is ---->

I was responding to this:  *And know a lot PK. I know A LOT about your posting habits more than you could ever imagine.*  I was accused of doing something I simply didn't do, so that just shows me how much you people really DO know, and, yes, I can *imagine* a LOT when faced with this kind of ominous post. 

Those of your ilk have dark histories of murdering people of different beliefs (for example, personnel at abortion clinics), and the latest tactic of the Neocons is intimidation and retribution.  Just ask Valerie Plame, who used to have a career before her husband spoke the truth.

If someone said that to you on your board, you'd be accusing them of threatening to assassinate you and contacting the FBI.  Who are you KIDDING?  Typical neocon double standard and hypocrisy at work again. 

but the point is, the far left hates Cheney as much or more than Bush, so impeach Bush, get Cheney, then what?  Impeach Cheney?  Then you get Hastert. I know the far left doesn't like him. Impeach him and get Ted Stevens.  He's a Republican, too.  (President pro tempore of the Senate).  Impeach him and get...Condi Rice...if she isn't buying shoes.  What have you gained. Absolutely nothing. Well...maybe some payback for Clinton, which is what this is all about anyway.  Why not just wait until 2008 and vote the bums out.