Yeah, I'm sure they're having wild orgies........Jeezus

Cover the pictures of our founding fathers? Maybe you need to party a little more - you sound like a miserable little wretch. Remove the log from your own eye before you try to remove the speck from mine.

• parties at the White House - Amanda
  • Okay...maybe I should try my point - Trigger Happy
    • Can YOU prove it's taxpayer money? - Mrs. Bridger
      • She said IF taxpayer money was being used - sm
    • Thank you!!! - that's what I've been trying to say - madmt
  • Thank you - read the links - see message - IMHO
    • What makes you think they're "FRAT" parties? nm - Just the big bad
      • Ok sorry, Animal House parties - is that better? - IMHO
    • I meant to add it reminds me of what I read about Napolean and M. Antionette - and how they lived - IMHO
      • I suppose they should cover the mirrors - Mrs. Bridger
        • Hypocritical, aren't you? Because you would - NEVER approve of Bush doing that, correct?nm
          • I could give 2 shts what Bush did in his personal life... - Mrs. Bridger
            • Hey, news flash - This isn't O's personal life - IMHO
              • Hey Newton - parties are after hours? - Mrs. Bridger
                • Hey Einstein - its the tax payers money - IMHO
            • Dont worry about Bush. OBAMA is ruining - what was left of our country -sad
            • You are still here, right? Still free? - Oh, yeah, you forgot that part..nm
        • Rock on and party dude - IMHO
          • Yeah, I'm sure they're having wild orgies........Jeezus - Mrs. Bridger
            • Maybe she's confusing Obama's parties with.(sm) - Just the big bad

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

It makes no sense whatsoever that I should email him, he should respond promptly, thanking me and saying he will post something, and VOILA, his posts appear.  What are the odds of FACTS being associated with that sequence of events?

Yeah, you're right.  That makes no sense at all because you've got your FACTS, and logic should just be ignored! 

And as far as who you claim to be, I couldn't care less who you are.  I should point out, however, that you're breaking the rules on this board, the same rules you claim to respect so much. 

the only thing you did in the above post is try to start yet another fight by claiming that all Obama supporters are racist.  Nice job staying on the issues...NOT.

BTW, I could give a rat's butt what MLK's party affiliation was.  I know what he stood for and fought for as a person, and that is what made him a legend, not his color and not his party credentials.

The ironic thing is that YOU are one of the ones who consistently bring race into just about every conversation.  Get over it.

to the whole country.  They're trying to take it over.  They want to control which God you believe in, who you love and what you do with your body, be it regarding life or regarding death.  If you don't voluntarily agree to turn your free will over to their control, they will hunt you down and nag you to death (since they can't do anything more violent on a message board).  It's obvious they are sick, sick people and need major help.

But they ARE like watching a car wreck and are sometimes hard to ignore.

I've thought about it, and for me personally, the very best thing to do is ignore them and for 2 reasons: 

1.  Ignoring them and not reading their posts makes my visit on this board much more pleasant.  I already know I'm not missing anything because there isn't one post on this entire board written by them that has contributed anything of value or intelligence.

2.  If we all refuse to read and respond to their posts, they might give up and go find another board to terrorize.  I doubt that, though, because they've taken over this board and simply don't have the CLASS to leave.  They take pride in their bully on the playground mentality and are proud of their ignorant behavior.  They will probably just continue to pat themselves on their backs on this board.  The only thing that might startle them and cause them to stop is that the NUMBER of posts on the Liberal board are starting to increase heavily as a direct result of their posting.  In the past, they've used the Liberal board's lower numbers to trash us for not being as interesting, when, in fact, the CON board must be pretty boring if they are always choosing to be HERE instead.

Like I said, I've decided that I'd like my visits here to be pleasant, so I'm just going to stop subjecting myself to their cesspools of attacks.  They've proven their posts aren't worth wasting time reading, so I'm just going to stop and will feel much better as a result of stopping.

That's exactly what I said.  Scarborough has always supported Bush.  There is a difference between supporting and blindly following.  For example, you see nothing wrong with how this case was handled.  You see nothing wrong with Bush lying every time he opens his mouth.  That's blind faith.

Scarborough is an objective Republican who believes in honesty.  I realize this is a difficult concept for some CONS to understand.  Once upon a time, honesty was considered a good thing in the United States.  People who were honest were considered to have moral character and integrity.  Scarborough is one of those rare of Republicans, totally foreign to you, I'm sure.

To blindly follow (which I'm sure you're quite familiar with) means worshiping a man as if he's some kind of god, believing every single word he says, even when you see evidence to the contrary right before your eyes.   He lies every day; those who follow blindly believe him every day.  And when it becomes common knowledge that he's lied and when they can't twist and manipulate the lie out of recognition any more, then his blind followers make excuses for him, usually blaming democrats or anyone else who is handy but never blaming the liar himself.  And they justify all the lying because they have that special *connection* with God.  They can lie all they want and God just winks at them and says it's okay because their place in heaven has already been guaranteed, unlike the rest of us poor slobs out there without that special connection.

The only thing that scares me more than Bush having the same credibility as Al Qaeda is the fact that there are so many morons who blindly follow him, who just aren't smart enough to figure out that Bush was never on their side - he's only on the side of big money.  He even joked about his *base* - the *haves* and the *have nots.*

By the way, you are on the liberal board.  If you don't care for the liberal point of view, the CON board is ---->

I was responding to this:  *And know a lot PK. I know A LOT about your posting habits more than you could ever imagine.*  I was accused of doing something I simply didn't do, so that just shows me how much you people really DO know, and, yes, I can *imagine* a LOT when faced with this kind of ominous post. 

Those of your ilk have dark histories of murdering people of different beliefs (for example, personnel at abortion clinics), and the latest tactic of the Neocons is intimidation and retribution.  Just ask Valerie Plame, who used to have a career before her husband spoke the truth.

If someone said that to you on your board, you'd be accusing them of threatening to assassinate you and contacting the FBI.  Who are you KIDDING?  Typical neocon double standard and hypocrisy at work again. 

but the point is, the far left hates Cheney as much or more than Bush, so impeach Bush, get Cheney, then what?  Impeach Cheney?  Then you get Hastert. I know the far left doesn't like him. Impeach him and get Ted Stevens.  He's a Republican, too.  (President pro tempore of the Senate).  Impeach him and get...Condi Rice...if she isn't buying shoes.  What have you gained. Absolutely nothing. Well...maybe some payback for Clinton, which is what this is all about anyway.  Why not just wait until 2008 and vote the bums out.