Who do you think you are kidding?
Posted By: This stupidity has been "out there"....sm on 2008-11-29
In Reply to: Certainly not a "landslide" - see message
Since the end of August....the moment Hillary lost in the primaries, Berg launched his legal proceedings. This subject has been exercised ad nauseum in the blogosphere ever since.
The sources for your claim that "a lot more people" would have voted differently "had they known" is curiously absent, making your credibility rating less than zero. Your speculation on "another election" is stupidity on top of stupidity. How do you think the 192 electoral vote margin could change? NOT. He received 67.8 percent of the electoral vote..more than 2/3rds. No one here said anything about a landslide, but it is not overstating the situation in the least to say that this election was won by a wide and comfortable margin that cannot and will not be reversed by this BC idiocy.
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
Are you kidding? (sm)
He never had any cheese on his cracker! All that clown needs is a room with mirrored walls and he'd be happy!
Who are YOU kidding?
You don't want to interrupt our so-called "Bush hate-fest with facts"????
Number one, you THRIVE on this. You thrive on spouting your drivel, fighting and spreading your venom. You need it like a fish needs water. You can't survive unless you spread your evil hatefulnes all over this board. You're not satisfied with a respectful, reasonable debate. You're not happy unless you're personally stomping someone who disagrees with you into the ground.
Number two, the entire issue involved with this thread IS "FACTS." An increasing number of Americans want to know what the truth is, and they're bright enough to realize they've been fed a bunch of lies by the idiot in the White House. You people are so adverse to the truth, you wouldn't be able to identify a fact if it hit you between the eyes.
I realize that you're energized and  over the fact that you've got a fight going here.
You have no compelling point of view. All you know how to do is insult and call people names. You don't have the ability to intelligently debate any issue. You're nothing more than message board thugs. I personally am very uncomfortable stooping that low, and from now on, I refuse to read and/or respond to any of your posts, and I would urge the thoughtful, respectful, intelligent people who frequent this board to do the same and NOT give you the conflict that you thrive on.
Take it back to the cesspool you call home: The Conservative Board. Isn't that what you've repeatedly promised to do, anyway, LEAVE?? Once again, your word has just as much value and credibility as Bush's. It's easy to see why you worship him. You share the same "values."
I don't know that it was kidding, but it's quite different.
But I'm sure you knew that. I could take the time to explain how these are two very different threats/comments from a legal as well as common sense standpoint but it it would fall on deaf ears. Not playing this game with you anymore. If you want to pretend to be ignorant, go ahead. Just not sure why you'd want to do it in public.
You ARE kidding, right?
You never heard of TRAVELGATE?!!!!!? Oh, well, people's lives were only ruined. People who had worked in the travel office under many different administrations. You know, people like you and me, just average Joes. Until Clinton cronyism ruined their lives. Gosh, how come you people don't know this stuff? That's really amazing. And disturbing.
You have got to be kidding, right?
Those comments the other night weren't particularly disturbing. They were a bit crass at times, and the John Willkes Booth comment was a bit coarse and probably a bit over the top.....but overall they were quite amusing. I even saved one posting because it was HILARIOUS. Okay, probably not hilarious to the conservative board, I do realize that. But after watching these dreadful playground bullies beat up on everyone on that board that didn't spew their propaganda there was some sort of justice in those posts that appeared. Sort of a karmic get-even thing. I am so glad that I got to read all of them that particular evening.
Reading the other board is kind of like passing a gruesome car accident. You don't want to look, but yet you can't resist.....and you never know how awful it's going to be. Human nature, I guess.
Your kidding right...??...sm
While this is not at the top of my list, a sitting president who was not elected by the people is nothing to say 'oh well' about.
I have always favored the popular vote over electorial votes. All electronic so swinging chads are not an issue.
You got to be kidding.
All day and night long, Bush used it as a political statement, beginning with Cheney and Rice on the Sunday talk show circuit and ending with a neocon made for TV movie that tried to pin the blame for 9/11 on Clinton.
Are you kidding?
213,000 refugees in 2004 and 801,000 in 2005 - I guess all this liberty/democracy/newfound security is just too much for some Iraqis, so they have to leave their country. ???????????????
Baghdad Empties as Residents Flee to Safety
Major Exodus Sends Hundreds of Thousands of Iraqis to Jordan, Syria
By JIM SCIUTTO
BAGHDAD, Iraq, Sept. 18, 2006 — - Iraqi officials insist that the government's security plan shows signs of success, but hundreds of thousands of Iraqis express a different view -- by leaving the region in hordes.
Baghdad's passport office is overrun with people trying to leave the country. On a recent afternoon, a car bomb went off just outside the gates, killing nine people.
Inside an official tried to calm the crowd, saying this happens all the time. The attack was one more reason for resident Kaiss Warash to want to leave Iraq.
I'm tired of life here, he said.
Visit bus stations in Iraq's capital and it's clear many feel the same as Warash. By some estimates, this is now the largest movement of refugees in the world today, with most of the fleeing people going to neighboring Syria and Jordan. And the pace of the movement has accelerated. In 2004, 213,000 Iraqis fled the country. Last year that number rose to 801,000.
There is persecution going on of religious minorities, of professionals … and of course Shia or Sunni, said Lavinia Limón of the U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants. People are actually told if you don't leave we're going to kill you.
The drain is worst among professionals. An estimated 40 percent of the country's professionals have left, and Baghdad's main hospital is now experiencing a dangerous shortage of trauma surgeons.
Unemployed but Safe
Across Baghdad, in some areas quiet streets and vacant homes are an eerie testament to the exodus.
In Jordan entire neighborhoods of Iraqi refugees have sprung up. In Jordan they can walk the streets safely again, but many can't work legally.
One refugee told us, I don't have a job here … but there's nothing better than security.
And so many keep leaving, hoping some day it will be safe to come home.
Copyright © 2006 ABC News Internet Ventures
No kidding!
I belive the vet stated that someone spat on the ground near him. This same vet has also had other incidents happen to him. Kind of strange. I guess accusations of spitting have been what is called an urban legend and been around since VIet Nam.
no kidding, you are right about that
My son heard some negative ads on the radio the other day and was telling me Obama did this or McCain is going to do that, and we had to have a talk about taking all of this with a grain of salt and about twisted half-truths. It's hard to get to the bottom of a lot of it. I really commend you for "I stand corrected." Not many people are willing to do that on either side.
You have got to be kidding!
Spreading false rumors - I thought junior high was over with!
Besides, it's far more probable that the Palin had the baby due to her age, rather than her young daughter.
Grow up, would ya?
Are you kidding me?
In my family....if there is a baby in the house....it is passed around like a game of pass the parcel. We love babies and quite frankly they get heavy sometimes....and so you pass them to someone else to TAKE A BREAK FROM THE DEAD WEIGHT OF A SLEEPING BABY. SHEESH. This isn't child abuse. This is called sharing the love!
are you kidding me?????
Glenn Beck last night!
ARE YOU KIDDING ME??
x
Are you kidding me?
The poor people of this country get all the benefits. I go to my local Wallyworld on the first weekend of every month and see those "poor" people wheeling 2 baskets of groceries, with crab legs and cases of beer and steaks, wearing gold jewelry, hair and nails done and better clothes than I wear and they pull out their benefits card to pay. And then when I get out to the parking lot I see them loading their groceries into the brand new car while I work for 3 services, dh works a full time job and a part time job and I got into my 10 year old SUV. and this happens every month, not a once or 2 thing. These people know how to work the system to get benefits and live the good life all the while. Give me a freaking break...you believe in charity...you give your paycheck away and leave mine alone. I have kids to take care of and I'd like to retire someday.
Are you kidding me??????
Believe me, if you were making 250K a year, you would definitely be paying more than 25%. I do have family members who work their BUTTS OFF to make that and I can guarantee you they pay FAR MORE than 25% in taxes, not to mention all the other garbage they get hit with, just for making an honest living and employing others.
So what now, we're supposed to despise those that succeed in life? Isn't that what we're supposed to strive to do?
Where do you think all the jobs come from in this country, besides our out of control government jobs? Jobs usually do come from those that financially may be better off. What's wrong with that? If they didn't own more and have more, so they could have businesses that employ the rest of us, where do you think you would be?
My husband is a CPA and does taxes as well and I can tell you you don't have a clue what you are talking about. Those making 250K don't make it by sitting on their duffs. They usually live at their businesses and if you think you have little time, they have even less for enjoyment, etc. And they pay through the nose to the tune of 50% plus on their taxes.
A flat tax would be the only fair way to be taxed at all, even though individuals paying income tax in this country is illegal anyway. There are no laws governing such thing. Only for corporate taxes. Instead of taxes, we should only have consumer taxing...we pay taxes on what we buy, not what we make.
Government has no right to our money, never has. Supreme Court shot down individuals paying income taxes back in the early 1900's, called it unconstitutional, but look how it managed to creep its ugly self back into our lives.
You have got to be kidding!!!!
From BF's own mouth when Greenspan and the republicans were trying to regulate FMFM, he said there was no problem. Know why? They would find out he and a bunch of others were skimming the profits.
This started before Bush. There were warnings but the dems did not heed them. Why? Because the republicans wanted this regulation and we all know NOW that the dems won't do anything for the better of the people if it means voting for something the repubs try to put in place, no matter how good the legislation is.
I think you better do some homework.
Are you kidding?
I know if your a democrat you staunchly believe it wasn't the democrats fault and it was all the republicans fault and vice versa. I'm sure you could even find articles written by democrats or republicans who will write article proving why its not the democrats or republicans fault. But facts are facts and they cannot be hidden.
My take is it is both sides fault. They all let it happen. They knew what was going on and they continued to line their pockets (both democrats and republicans?)
I am sick to death of one side blaming the other side and then sit there and say , oh no, it wasn't the side I support, it was everyone else.
Have you seen a list of the people who had a hand in this. BOTH SIDES!!!!!
Then of course when you point it out they say "oh, well lets not do the blame game". They won't take responsibility for a situation they created.
And now they have the nerve to let the same people who got us into this mess figure out a solution to get us out? Are they for real?????? That's like letting criminals once found guilty decide what punishment they should receive.
Oh and the top 1% of republicans that is getting rich under a republican president is the same 1% that were getting rich under a democrat president. It may take awhile but I could find the names of the 1% wealthy that got even more wealthy when Clinton was in. Both sides! Face the facts.
I am so disgusted with the whole thing. They are all crooks and I don't trust not one of them! They should all be fired! Crooked to the bone, liars to the core!!!!!!
No, I'm not kidding
It would be nice to write off the current crisis on Wall Street and global financial markets as something that only matters to the investor class.
Unfortunately, the effects are already being felt in lower-income communities around the United States. Worst-case scenarios for what spins out from the U.S. mortgage meltdown are truly frightening -- a severe world recession is a distinct possibility.
Whether such worst-case scenarios can be averted, or softened -- and preventing the recurrence of similar crises in the future -- depends on abandoning the laissez-faire financial regulatory regime entrenched over the last decade.
The current crisis is the predictable (and predicted) result of a massive U.S. housing bubble, which itself can be traced in part to global economic imbalances that could have been prevented.
At least five distinct regulatory failures led to the current crisis.
Regulatory Failure Number One: Failure to Manage the U.S. Trade Deficit. The housing bubble (as well as the surge in leveraged buyouts of publicly traded companies ("private equity")) was fueled by cheap credit -- low interest rates. One reason for the cheap credit was an influx of capital into the United States from China. China's capital surplus was the mirror image of the U.S. trade deficit -- U.S. corporations were sending lots of dollars to China in exchange for the cheap stuff sold to U.S. consumers.
Regulatory Failure Number Two: Failure to Intervene to Pop the Housing Bubble. Along with an influx of capital, Federal Reserve policy kept interest rates very low. There were good reasons for the Fed Policy, but that did not mean the Fed was helpless to prevent the housing bubble. As economists Dean Baker and Mark Weisbrot of the Center for Economic and Policy Research insisted at the time, Federal Reserve Chair Alan Greenspan simply by identifying the bubble -- and adjusting public perception of the future of the housing market -- could have prevented or at least contained the bubble. He declined, and even denied the existence of a bubble.
Regulatory Failure Number Three: Financial Deregulation and Unchecked Financial "Innovation." A key reason that mortgages were made available so widely and with such little review of recipients' qualifications was a shift in which institutions hold the mortgages. Traditionally, banks made mortgages and held them. In the new era, banks and non-bank mortgage lenders made loans, but then sold the loans to others. Investment banks packaged lots of mortgage loans into "Collateralized Debt Obligations" (CDOs) and then sold them on Wall Street, with a promise of a steady stream of revenue from interest payments. These operations were pretty much unregulated. Despite the supposed sophistication of the investors involved, no one took account of how shoddy the loans were or -- more fundamentally -- the certainty that huge numbers would go bad if and when the housing bubble popped.
Regulatory Failure Number Four: Private Regulatory Failure. It was the job of ratings agencies (like Standard and Poor's, and Moody's) to assess the CDOs and give investors guidance on how risky they were. They failed totally, likely in part because they wanted to maintain good relations with the investment banks issuing the CDOs.
Regulatory Failure Number Five: No Controls Over Predatory Lenders. The toxic stew of financial deregulation and the housing bubble created the circumstances in which aggressive lenders were nearly certain to abuse vulnerable borrowers. The terms of your loan don't matter, they effectively purred to borrowers, so long as the value of your house is going up. Lenders duped borrowers into conditions they could not possibly satisfy, making the current rash of foreclosures on subprime loans inevitable. Effective regulation of lending practices could have prevented the abusive loans, but none was to be found.
Unfortunately, the consequences of the mortgage meltdown go far beyond the foreclosure epidemic, as horrible a toll as that is taking. The entanglement of the financial sector with mortgage instruments, and the ripple effects of the housing bubble, has made lenders uncertain of who even among large corporations and financial institutions is credit worthy. The resulting credit crunch endangers the functioning of the global economy. Financial markets are guessing wildly about the prospects of banks, insurers and other financial corporations, and the plunging value of stocks poses immediate dangers to the real global economy.
Less acute, but probably more profoundly, the popping of the housing bubble is driving down home prices. U.S. consumer demand over the last five years has been driven by consumers borrowing against the increased value of their homes; with housing values falling, that process is working in reverse. The depressed housing market is also ravaging the construction sector, a nontrivial portion of the U.S. economy. A serious recession looms as a real possibility.
Mitigating these harms and preventing the worst now depends on active and interventionist government -- a government stimulus plan, and aggressive efforts to force lenders to adjust mortgage terms and let people stay in their homes. Preventing financial panics of the kind now underway require new standards of transparency and regulation for high finance. The coming days and months will tell whether any lessons have been learned.
R U Kidding?
Suggest you study up on national health care in other countries. It is NOT good.
no kidding!
x
You are kidding, right?
Surely you have more to do with your time than this rubbish. Get over it!!
no, I'm not kidding
and the part that matters is that the tax tables do not lie. did you read that part or just jump to a conclusion. Do what it says. Look at the tax tables from those years and see for yourself. The IRS publications and tables are all available to you.
are you kidding me?
x
Are you kidding me?..nm
nm
What? Are you kidding me?
if it were McCain's mother? Seriously. It does not get any more desperate than this. You would discount the validity of the last act of a living, breathing American? Alive and strong enough to make to the early polls...should it count. You bet it should.
No kidding
I had some other military wife tell me that she just doesn't have four hours to spend making bread--of course it doesn't really take four hours and she has no kids and no job, so I really wondered why not? If I can do it, why can't she? Lazy is really my guess and I don't really care, except she was so condescending about the whole thing.
Are you kidding?
You need to take the time to read the begining post before you start going on about nothing. Poster was making a comment against whites, referring to their ammo, and I just told her as a black person, I own a gun and there is nothing wrong with that. Don't act so ridiculous.
Are you kidding me? I have taken so
past 3 years....the latest one being the company I work for did away with our QC dept. It is now the MTs responsibility to do the QC work -- for no pay of course. They sure didn't ask for my opinion before doing this. But, I still have a job, and yes, I am thankful for that.
Yes I am serious and no I am not kidding.
ALL politicians are responsible for this financial mess and doesn't it seem quite odd that an emergency economic summit would be called by foreign countries? Reckon they were about to call in our national debt? What kind of deal do you suppose Bush made to keep them at bay until Obama takes office?
are you kidding???
who really cares??? how can you ask? Everyone should care. We are talking about the Constitution here. How can someone not care? I think it is very important that our Constitution be honored, very very important. What else would you like to "not care about." our Bill of Rights, too? Sure, who cares??? That is one DUMB question. I would have expected better.
Are you kidding me?...(sm)
FYI, I'm not talking about O'Reilly, Hannity and Colmes, Greta VanSustern, etc. I'm talking about the regular news. --- Ummm, they are the regular news...LOL. So about what percentage of Fox News do you think is appropriate?
I guess you don't like it because its more fair in its reporting and not one-sided.
No, it's definitely one-sided, just like MSNBC is one-sided. Unfortunately, I think most people get their news from one main source. If you don't ever look around at the other side, then you can never realize just how biased your side may be. This is true for both sides. Personally I actually watch alot of them including MSNBC, CCN, Fox, BBC, Link TV, and read a lot online. I think that if you expose yourself to both sides, you have a better basis for forming an opinion of your own.
LOL!!! Are you KIDDING?
The right wingers have produced more organized boycotts of advertisers than anyone in history that I can recall. Below are just two of the sites that describe this.
As far as Ann Coulter is concerned, I personally prefer to hear her voice when her jaw is wired shut; however, I want to see more, more, MORE of her. In fact, I think they should give her her own show! Coulter and Chip Saltsman are great for the Democratic party. 
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/american-family-association
http://www.wluml.org/english/newsfulltxt.shtml?cmd%5B157%5D=x-157-247584
R U Kidding?
This guy, as you say, the one who has been there, done the fighting and made the sacrifice - you think YOU have a better grasp of the situation than he does while you sit at home transcribing?? How arrogant can you possibly be?? And having a God son who is there now, I can tell you many Iraqis are grateful for our presence and have come out and said so to members of our military.
Are you kidding? I do not see a
I do not think a burglar would attempt a 9/11 attack and killed thousands of people.
No kidding!!!
President Obama will make us vulnerable? President BUSH is the one who snubbed the world, told the UN task force that had searched for WMD that we were going to invade Iraq, even when they did their inspection of Iraq and told everyone that there were no WMD (which has been proven to be true). Bush had his own agenda - to finish the job that his father couldn't or wouldn't - nothing else. No matter what leaders of the free world told him, he could have cared less. He thumbed his nose at the whole world and just did as he felt, constitution be damned! HE is the reason the rest of the world hates us.
The head of the UN factfinding mission to Iraq quit because of Bush ignoring the fact that there WERE NO WMD, therefore no reason to attack Iraq. Bush ignored him and he ignored the will of MOST of the forward thinking people in this country.
Foreign relations were great under the 3 administrations before Bush. Now we have invaded Iraq and Afghanistan (which is where he SHOULD have concentrated on finding AL Qaida - they don't live in Iraq!) and we are close to another cold war with Russia.
President Obama is a uniter, not a divider. He is going to have his hands full trying to re-establish diplomatic relations with the rest of the world.
It is going to take years to re-establish the good foreign relationships that we had pre-Bush. It is going to take a LONG time for the world to trust us again.
You are Kidding...
Rush has honesty??? Take off the rose colored glasses. He is a liar and a criminal and most of all a total HYPOCRITE.
Oh my....are you kidding me?
So we should all support President Obama because he is the president. We can't oppose anything he does and we can't question anything? So what is the point of the senate and congress? You are describing a dictatorship and I hope and pray that is not what America is heading for.
BTW, it is one NATION under God but you can't even say that anymore because too many people get their panties in a bunch when you mention God.
You have got to be kidding me!
We don't care? How unbelieveably arrogant! No wonder they can go on blindly passing bills that have nothing to do with anything - they think we don't care what they do!
No, I am not kidding.
Nancy Pelosi is not the one who spews hatred and anger. She is an intelligent, accomplished woman who has worked tirelessly for the good of this country. I have read your posts, and most of them are angry and one-sided. For example, today's post about illegal aliens. You found it "unbelievable" that someone would want to stop racial hatred and protest the fact that a couple of smug high-school football players murdered an innocent Hispanic man. Frankly, I find that unbelievable!
No Kidding!
The cult thread below fits here....Obama cult follower for sure!
Are you kidding me?
Walking around the middle east would not make me appreciate how moral this country is because it has lost most of its morality, which is why we seen crap on TV every night pushing the envelope at every turn, taking God out of our schools, trying to push gay marriage, and the lists go on and on. It is the parents' place to teach their children moral values. Just because a country practices sick practices such as beheading and strapping bombs to someone doesn't relieve us of our duties in this country of instilling moral values in our children. If a child isn't taught the love of God from an early age on and they enter the public school system with all its sickening government institutionalized garbage, you think that child will somehow "know" what is the truth? Pleeeze!!! That's the problem. Parents who just let things slide in their schools and their communities, mainly because they're too worried about what others think or they're just plain too lazy to care!!
Sorry you have such negative views of church....perhaps you need to find one who truly teaches the word of God and you'll know it when you hear it. My children are grown and they do know immorality when they see it, but I can guarantee you if I sat on my butt and let everything around them in their everyday lives dictate their moral values, they wouldn't have any!!!!
Are you kidding me!!!
The dems were in control of congress for the past 2 years and could have done something or at least brought something of worth to the table. however, they didn't want to do anything good (not that they had anything good in the first place) while Bush was in office because they didn't want him to get credit for it. That is how these parties work. That is why both parties are not for the people. The pubs don't want the dems to succeed because it makes them look bad and the the dems don't want the pubs to succeed for the same reason. This is why it is so hard to get them to reach across the aisle and work together. They are too busy lining their pockets with money, paying back the special interest groups that got them elected, and trying to make their party look better than the other. This is why we are where we are. WAKE UP PEOPLE! SMELL THE COFFEE!
Are you kidding me?
Obama does have a personal agenda and all this spending of money shows it perfectly. First of.....he is trying to pay off everyone who invested in his campaign.....that is why we needed spending bills with pork in them. In fact, Obama lied about keeping pork out of the spending bills and instead signed them even though they were loaded with pork. Obama is nothing but a socialist puppet for all who contributed millions to his campaign.
Secondly, Obama....like most dems, want a bigger government. They want government to control more. Just like them bailing out AIG (which gave Dodd and Obama a butt load of money for their campaigns) and after slipping in the loophole to allow their bonuses.....now the government wants to take it away because the public found out and is outraged. The constitution is being shredded and spit on.
I cannot believe that you people cannot see the warning signs here. This is total take over. We are heading down the road of socialism and the dems are doing nothing but spending, smiling, and running our country into the ground. Obama lacks the experience and all they want to do is spend and tax....spend and tax. That isn't going to help our economic crisis.
All Obama cares about is his personal agenda. That is why he keeps spending to get this done before we are totally bankrupt. I'm so sick and tired of hearing how Bush spend so much money in 8 years but yet you refuse to hold Obama accountable for the amount of money he has spent in a few months. What a joke! The double standards are absolutely friggin amazing with some of you people.
Bush made some major mistakes and government spent money like it was going out of style. All Obama talked about was change and hope and how we couldn't survive with another 4 years like Bush's 8 years. Well....look at the money government and Obama has spent in a few month and he has the audacity to talk about how much Bush spent in 8 years with a war. Are you kidding me?
The reason a lot of people are upset about Obama is because his presidency is a mistake......and a BIG one. He is doing nothing but finishing W's job of running this country into the ground because our government is too corrupt and all they want to do is pay back the companies and people who contributed to their campaign. Government gets so many benefits while they are in office as well as continued benefits while they are out. I think they need to have things stripped from them. The next time they complain about CEOs having private jets, I want all of governments private jets to be taken away as well. What is good for the goose is good for the gander. Government is so busy passing judgment on businesses and CEOs while they do nothing but waste and spend money themselves. Makes me sick and obama is part of this mess.
I am just amazed at how many people still follow this man blindly. Open your eyes. If you think the US is heading in the right direction, why don't you take a trip to Russia and live there for a bit and see how you like it cuz that is what we will become under Obama's regime.
I have no faith in Obama whatsoever. Not only do I think our enemies find him to be a joke, but his constant spending shows me that he doesn't give a rats behind about the American people. He just cares about turning our country into a socialist country and will spend whatever it takes to get there.
But keep drinking the kool-aid!
NO KIDDING!!
.
Are you kidding me?
If you think for one minute this document has ANYTHING to do with "terrorists" you are delusional. If your government were so concerned about your safety and well being from the "bad guys", then why in hades are your borders wide open to anyone who is REALLY a terrorist.... free to walk across at any moment, day or night? Pleeeze!!!!
You have got to be kidding me...(sm)
"He really did have a heart for the soldiers and their families." Is that why he sent soldiers to their death in a war that didn't need to happen -- not to mention soldiers who are still there working out this mess (with casualties still coming in) -- all because of Bush's greed for oil?
And yeah, Beck has made a name for himself at Fox...but probably the one he was hoping for. The name "raving lunatic" comes to mind.
Geez...you are so far off the deep end its pathetic.
You have got to be kidding me!!!
You do nothing but ridicule people for watching Fox News even though Fox has the highest ratings going on right now and you post a video from MSNBC. They aren't biased at all, are they? Give me a break. Why don't you post something substantial from an actual source instead of the twisted BS from MSNBC.
No kidding!
They certainly are a dying breed....thus the reason for all the drama queens on this board. Just talking louder doesn't make you right.
you must be kidding
like you are nonpartisan!! Do you really think this is okay? you don't have a problem with the truth being buried, whatever it may be?
You have got to be kidding....(sm)
"No one can marry someone of the same sex. Never in the history of the world."
How about Canada, Sweden, Norway, Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, South Africa......closer to home.....Massachusetts, Connecticut, Iowa, Vermont, New Hampshire.... 
|
