What part of "I am republican first and foremost" (Colin Powell)
Posted By: Do you not understand? nm on 2008-10-19
In Reply to: You do understand the term, "closet" democrat, don't you???nm - nice ry yourself
nm
Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old. To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
same with Colin Powell
It is easy to see that he is heart-sick that his years of service to our nation were in vain because he was pressured into making those untrue statements to Congress. It is big, sick, industrial machine ruining lives everywhere it plants its massive cloven hoof.
what about Colin Powell as VP?
x
Come to think of it, Colin Powell might be the
.
Was that before or after General Colin Powell
nm
I don't look to Colin Powell as my "leader"
@
And let us not forget....Colin Powell....
believed that same "bad" intelligence and went before the UN to sell it to the world. Surely they do not consider Colin Powell an imbicele...the same Colin Powell who endorsed Barack Obama? Surely NOT. Sighhhhh. So did the senate foreign relations committee, lots of Democrats. Our VP elect also voted for the war resolution. But that is conveniently forgotten in the rip Bush apart effort. These same people who preach unity. Sighhhh.
Colin Powell would get voted in in a heartbeat if he ran.
He would have democratic and republican support.
I wish he would run too!
IMHO Colin Powell isn't a puppet.
Colin Powell interview on Obama
Beautifully stated. See link.
I doubt Colin Powell would ever speak out against this admin.
It's not in his nature to be a whistle blower.
I will say though I have ALWAYS admired him, before he joined the Bush admin. I had great respect for him; in fact, when I learned that he was a republican I was surprised. I felt we had a lot in common politically. While I am a democrat, I consider myself an independent thinker and do not always vote a straight democratic ticket.
I still had respect for him though as sec of state in Bush's admin. It did turn my stomach though when he made the case for this war, I felt he was either being lied to and was falling for it or felt he had to support it because of his political affiliation.
If you've ever heard him speak publically, he's very down to earth and nonpolitical in his nature. Much to be admired still in this man.
Colin Powell....closet democrat...no surprise there...nm
What makes you think Colin Powell would want to be on the McCain ticket?
Colin Powell decided not to run for President of the United States several years ago. Why on earth would he accept an offer to run for Vice President on the McCain ticket? In addition, Powell has adamantly denounced the despicable smear tactics used by the McCain campaign recently.
I find it laughable how quickly the right-wing wackos turn against anyone who makes an educated decision to support Obama.
I prefer watching re-runs of Colin Powell's
nm
Here we have a fringe flock constituent accusing Colin Powell
with a straight face and seriously expecting us to buy into this psycho-babble. The only people you are scaring with this trash is each other.
I agree. This is the exact reason why Colin Powell wouldn't run..sm
He didn't want his privacy or his entire family's personal life to be dug up and exploited by the media. He got a lot of respect from me when he chose to protect what was the most important to him...family.
LOL...Is this the part where I call you a bible-thumping republican? ROFL....sm
I got most of those books, by the way. Going on vacation after today though, so it'll probably be a week before we can get into it.
First and foremost - I am an American
Stupd is as stupid does. His stepfather was muslim. His biological father had nothing to do with his upbringing and his grandparents (white folks from Kansas) raised him. He went to a primarily Muslim school and also Catholic schools. He is a Christian. But, Christians can be violent terrorists just as much as Muslims. Please research before you make judgments - it just makes you look ignorant.
First and foremost, Obama was not sent by God... SM
nor was his winning the election the will of God. It was by God's gift of free will to mankind that Obama was elected. Mankind's will is not always (and most of the time not ever) in line with the will of God. God would no more send Obama to be our leader than he would "send" Satan to lead. You did get one thing right, it is a test for all His followers (God's, not Obama's – lest you confuse the two). Being excited about Obama being in office and fainting in his presence, fixating on what he's ordering for lunch, calling him "The One," and as you called him the deliverer from your oppressor is taking "excitement" to another unhealthy, dangerous level. I'm not promoting myself. I'm hoping that with all the "intellect" all you Obama groupies claim to possess, you might recognize the fact that all this hoopla has become more than just mere excitement. My belief system is what inspires me and my relationship with God is what led me to post my original post. You are on very dangerous ground. However, as an atheist, this is not unfamiliar territory for you.
I understand the need for change. I haven't been exactly thrilled in the last eight years with how President Bush handled some things. However, wanting change without definition is very dangerous. Obama is different and he offers "change" but at what cost?
I haven't "sang" the praises of President Bush. Did I vote for him? Yes, twice. This is what I will say about President Bush. He is a patriot. He made our national security his priority. Like it or not, there is a war going on against terrorism. It is a war that was brought to our front door. We cannot ignore that. Nor can we ignore the potential threat that Iran poses in its quest for nuclear capabilities. Regardless of the fact that Israel possesses nuclear weapons, these weapons in the hands of terrorists, zealots, fundamentalist Muslims with a hatred toward us, towards Israel, is very scary and very dangerous. These are the things President Bush addressed during his time in office. Terrorism is real and is not going away. And you don't have to tell me about the sacrifices our men and women in the military are making. My husband is a military man. My husband served in Desert Storm and he has done a tour in Iraq. I know a great many soldiers who believe in what they are doing with every fiber of the being. They are on the front lines and see the difference they are making. They know what they are fighting. You talk big about human rights and genocide and yet you criticize our presence in Iraq which single-handedly put an end to the reign of a evil genocidal dictator.
If you believe for one minute that Obama is going to change the way that Iran or any other country in the middle east view America you are very, very naive. The only thing Obama will accomplish will be to weaken this country in an effort to make us more "likeable" to the world and in the end the only thing we will be is weak.
My dislike of Obama has nothing to do with the color of skin. I point out his race only because that seems to be what everyone else finds to be so fabulous about his rise to power.
Another arrow pointing to your naivete, this "global leader" Obama, this man called the "world's president" – do you believe this man is going to put an end to offshoring American jobs? How can he make America liked and respected by other countries, and take away a source of income for so many in third world countries?
There have been many a man of "vision," "intelligence," "compassion," and "faith," but none more so than the true Messiah, Jesus Christ. How ironic and unfortunate you choose to worship Obama instead of Him!
First and foremost, Obama was not sent by God... SM
nor was his winning the election the will of God. It was by God's gift of free will to mankind that Obama was elected. Mankind's will is not always (and most of the time not ever) in line with the will of God. God would no more send Obama to be our leader than he would "send" Satan to lead. You did get one thing right, it is a test for all His followers (God's, not Obama's – lest you confuse the two). Being excited about Obama being in office and fainting in his presence, fixating on what he's ordering for lunch, calling him "The One," and as you called him the deliverer from your oppressor is taking "excitement" to another unhealthy, dangerous level. I'm not promoting myself. I'm hoping that with all the "intellect" all you Obama groupies claim to possess, you might recognize the fact that all this hoopla has become more than just mere excitement. My belief system is what inspires me and my relationship with God is what led me to post my original post. You are on very dangerous ground. However, as an atheist, this is not unfamiliar territory for you.
I understand the need for change. I haven't been exactly thrilled in the last eight years with how President Bush handled some things. However, wanting change without definition is very dangerous. Obama is different and he offers "change" but at what cost?
I haven't "sang" the praises of President Bush. Did I vote for him? Yes, twice. This is what I will say about President Bush. He is a patriot. He made our national security his priority. Like it or not, there is a war going on against terrorism. It is a war that was brought to our front door. We cannot ignore that. Nor can we ignore the potential threat that Iran poses in its quest for nuclear capabilities. Regardless of the fact that Israel possesses nuclear weapons, these weapons in the hands of terrorists, zealots, fundamentalist Muslims with a hatred toward us, towards Israel, is very scary and very dangerous. These are the things President Bush addressed during his time in office. Terrorism is real and is not going away. And you don't have to tell me about the sacrifices our men and women in the military are making. My husband is a military man. My husband served in Desert Storm and he has done a tour in Iraq. I know a great many soldiers who believe in what they are doing with every fiber of the being. They are on the front lines and see the difference they are making. They know what they are fighting. You talk big about human rights and genocide and yet you criticize our presence in Iraq which single-handedly put an end to the reign of a evil genocidal dictator.
If you believe for one minute that Obama is going to change the way that Iran or any other country in the middle east view America you are very, very naive. The only thing Obama will accomplish will be to weaken this country in an effort to make us more "likeable" to the world and in the end the only thing we will be is weak.
My dislike of Obama has nothing to do with the color of skin. I point out his race only because that seems to be what everyone else finds to be so fabulous about his rise to power.
Another arrow pointing to your naivete, this "global leader" Obama, this man called the "world's president" – do you believe this man is going to put an end to offshoring American jobs? How can he make America liked and respected by other countries, and take away a source of income for so many in third world countries?
There have been many a man of "vision," "intelligence," "compassion," and "faith," but none more so than the true Messiah, Jesus Christ. How ironic and unfortunate you choose to worship Obama instead of Him!
for new pres foremost, to keep us safe.
x
The Anti-Republican Republican Who is Really a Republican
The whole anti-Republican Republican ruse might have succeeded, were it not for the fact that McCain's rhetoric was at odds not merely with his own voting record - 90 percent with Bush - and his own Bush-on-steroids agenda.
Even as he was pledging to "change the way government does almost everything," the senator from Arizona announced his commitment to much, much more of the same.
He pledged to maintain endless occupations of distant lands that empty the U.S. Treasury of precious resources that might pay for infrastructue renewal, housing and job creations initiatives for hurting Americans.
He outlined trade and tax policies that would extend, rather than alter a failed economic status quo.
He reintroduced flawed proposals for health care, education and entitlement reforms that Americans have wisely rejected.
And he threatened to achieve "energy independence" by declaring:
"We will drill..."
"We'll drill..."
"More drilling..."
McCain's rhetoric was that of a liberated man declaring his independence from his party's failed president and corrupt Congresses.
But his platform was that of Republican candidate who, for all of his talk of reform, offers the crudest continuity to a country that is crying out for change.
http://www.truthout.org/article/the-anti-republican-republican-who-is-really-a-republican
Colin, not Colon...you must be an MT! Thanks for the laugh..nm!
//
Colin said he was given wrong info IT WAS ABOUT OIL sm
You really have to do some research. Absolutely no WMD. Even Palin admitted it's about nation building and energy resources. Dead young people for oil. What a sorry shame. Shame on you republicans!!!
!!!
I saw this last year. It was great. I have always liked Colin, even though I disagreed w/him...sm
I do understand why he left his position. It takes a real con to hold his head high when they know they are lying to you with a straight face.
only part saved was the ignorant part
You can read the whole article. This quote was saved to show what she said that was so stupid.
Powell
I agree. I think he'd win by a landslide, and America would finally have a President with some dignity. Oh, to dream!!
Powell
He was never anything but a Dem in my book. Notice that it was that nasty, ole' George Bush who was the first prez to put a black into such a high level in his cabinet. And also Condi Rice... But Bush is way too lib for me, anyway. But he's right on things I consider important.
I find it amazing that the Dems will defend their party no matter what the scandal, but the Republicans don't. Rmemeber Mark Foley? Gone! His replacement: 3rd mistress, I believe? How about Ted Stevens? He needs to GO, and is Republican. Clinton cheating on Hillary all the time? I wouldn't condone that from any of them.
That's my point, and it's the truth. The politicians work for US, remember?
The show and Powell
I thought the show was wonderful and illustrated very clearly how bits and pieces of intelligence were selected and manipulated and turned into something they weren't. (They referred to it as a "Chinese menu" that the administration used to pick and choose from.)
I taped this show and watched it a couple times. As far as Powell is concerned, it did show how Powell's relationship with George Tenet began to disintegrate.
It further showed how Tenet was, at Bush's father's urging, kept as CIA director when Dubya took office, and all the events leading to his resignation. He was one of Dubya's sacrifical lambs. I guess Bush thought giving him the Medal of Freedom made up for that.
Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, Powell's chief of staff, said that Powell told him, "I wonder how we'll all feel if we put half a million troops into Iraq and march from one corner of the country to the other and find nothing."
Powell said, "I will forever be known as the one who made the case. I have to live with that." (That made me feel really bad for Powell, who I have always trusted and considered to be an honest, ethical man. His association with Bush really dragged him down, and his statement about having to live with that just tells me that he's still an honest, ethical man, the kind of man who had a spectacular military career, actually had the guts to go fight in wars himself, someone who truly IS Presidential material, someone who doesn't belong in an underhanded, lying, foolish administration like Bush's.)
The show also pointed out how if you are someone who works for this president and you discover something not right or in alignment with his "plans," if you tell him, you'd better be prepared to resign or be fired.
This show clearly illustrated how Bush wanted to go to war with Iraq, and all he needed was a reason, even if he had to invent a fictional one.
Again, I thought it was an excellent show, and if you ever have the opportunity to watch it or obtain a transcript of it, I would highly recommend it.
I always admired Powell
There are some people you admire even if their politics are different and it's because they appear to have integrity. That's what the frothing right-winger(s) on this board don't understand. It's more about integrity than political affiliation for some of us. And that's why so many folks don't care for Bush - he had a life-long history of lacking integrity and being publicly mean and petty at times.
You got that right. Colon Powell could have
nm
If he had chosen Powell...
all we would be hearing is about how Powell went to the UN and "lied" about the "faulty intelligence" that took us into Iraq. Powell has said that no one lied and it was indeed faulty intelligence and he believed it too...and the same people who are here lauding Powell since he endorsed Obama probably are the same ones who said Bush lied men died. Opinions are based totally on what side of the political fence someone is presently standing on. LOL. Sigh.
Here's a few more republicans besides Powell
1. William Buckley, III
2. Susan Eisenhower
3. Julie Nixon Eisenhower
4. US Senator Lincoln Chaffee (R-Rhode Island)
5. Former Rep Jim Leach (R-Iowa)
6. Former Bush White House intelligence advisor Rita E. Hauser
7. Governor Linwood Holton (R-Virginia)
8. Former LA Mayor Richard Riordan (R)
9. Bill Ruckelshaus, appointed first chief of the EPA in 1970 by President Nixon, appointed acting director of the FBI in 1973 and later named deputy U.S. attorney general. He resigned rather than obey an order from Nixon to fire the Watergate special prosecutor, Archibald Cox. In 1983, Ruckelshaus was appointed interim director of the EPA by President Reagan.
10. Douglas Kmiec, co-chairman of Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign’s Committee for the Courts and the Constitution; worked in the Reagan Justice Department.
11. Mayor Ed Koch of New York, formerally endorsed Rudy Giuliani and Michael Bloomberg for Mayor, AL D’Amato for U.S. Senate, George Pataki for Governor, and, in 2004, George W. Bush for President of the United States.
12. Retired four-star Air Force General Merrill “Tony” McPeak, served in the Air Force for 35 years. Former member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, served as co-chairman of Oregon Veterans for Bush something he would later call an enormous mistake.
13. Donald Capoccia Vice Chair, US Commission of Fine Arts
14. Jackson M. Andrews, Republican Counsel to the U.S. Senate. Republican nominee, U.S. Senate from Kentucky.
15. John Martin, Founder of RepublicansForObama.org
16. Richard J. Schwartz, Chairman, New York State Council on the Arts
17. Todd Garrett, retired Senior VP and CIO of the Procter & Gamble Company
18. Richard B. Stewart, Assistant Attorney General for Environment and Natural Resources
19. Jim Whitaker, Fairbanks, Alaska Mayor
20. Ambassador Thomas Graham Jr., Executive Chairman of Thorium Power Ltd.
Collin Powell........sm
has been hoodwinked, just like so much of America who has put on the blinders when Obama is the subject for discussion. I don't believe that Powell is necessarily a fool, but I do believe he has been fooled.
If it was McCain and Col. Powell
I would have probably voted for Powell. If it was McCain and Rice, I probably would have voted for Rice. But Obama? WHO IS HE, REALLY! I know nothing about him. I do not trust him at all, ESPECIALLY since now our new treasury guy is in office. Soooo, can I use Turbo tax and kinda of fudge my taxes and not pay for some things and then state, "Oh, I am sorry, I guess I do not know how to use Turbo Tax." You know it and I know it that I would be thrown in jail. But this? A guy who is now running our treasury department? There are higher ups now, newscasters, Jim Cramer on Mad Money and so many others who are not pleased with the new treasury guy let alone Obama's stimulus package. I even heard almost half the Democrats, are not to thrilled with his stimulus package.
Nope, DO NOT trust our new president at all. I wish we could have had future presidents take a mental exam. Sorry, I really, REALLY wanted our new president to the best for this country. We are all in the same boat, but I choose not to sink in the same boat.
If McCain had chosen Powell for VP...sm
the race would be a LOT closer right now. Stupid choice John.
You must be thrilled that C. Powell has relegated SP's SNL flop
nm
Exactly. The real Obama himself. I thought Powell
was to be picked for something by Obama since Powell endorsed Obama. Waiting to see where Oprah fits in this too. Already picking shady characters for his team and more liberals. Partisanship, my ....
Powell WMD speech 'lowest point in my life'
Former aide: Powell WMD speech 'lowest point in my life'
Tuesday, August 23, 2005; Posted: 10:44 a.m. EDT (14:44 GMT)
Former Secretary of State Colin Powell presents the case that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction in 2003.
(CNN) -- A former top aide to Colin Powell says his involvement in the former secretary of state's presentation to the United Nations on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction was "the lowest point" in his life.
"I wish I had not been involved in it," says Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, a longtime Powell adviser who served as his chief of staff from 2002 through 2005. "I look back on it, and I still say it was the lowest point in my life."
Wilkerson is one of several insiders interviewed for the CNN Presents documentary "Dead Wrong -- Inside an Intelligence Meltdown." The program pieced together the events leading up to the mistaken WMD intelligence that was presented to the public. A presidential commission that investigated the pre-war WMD intelligence found much of it to be "dead wrong."
Powell's speech, delivered on February 5, 2003, made the case for the war by presenting U.S. intelligence that purported to prove that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. Wilkerson says the information in Powell's presentation initially came from a document he described as "sort of a Chinese menu" that was provided by the White House.
"(Powell) came through the door ... and he had in his hands a sheaf of papers, and he said, 'This is what I've got to present at the United Nations according to the White House, and you need to look at it,'" Wilkerson says in the program. "It was anything but an intelligence document. It was, as some people characterized it later, sort of a Chinese menu from which you could pick and choose."
Wilkerson and Powell spent four days and nights in a CIA conference room with then-Director George Tenet and other top officials trying to ensure the accuracy of the presentation, Wilkerson says.
"There was no way the Secretary of State was going to read off a script about serious matters of intelligence that could lead to war when the script was basically un-sourced," Wilkerson says.
In one dramatic accusation in his speech, Powell showed slides alleging that Saddam had bioweapons labs mounted on trucks that would be almost impossible to find.
"In fact, Secretary Powell was not told that one of the sources he was given as a source of this information had indeed been flagged by the Defense Intelligence Agency as a liar, a fabricator," says David Kay, who served as the CIA's chief weapons inspector in Iraq after the fall of Saddam. That source, an Iraqi defector who had never been debriefed by the CIA, was known within the intelligence community as "Curveball."
After searching Iraq for several months across the summer of 2003, Kay began e-mailing Tenet to tell him the WMD evidence was falling apart. At one point, Wilkerson says, Tenet called Powell to tell him the claims about mobile bioweapons labs were apparently not true.
"George actually did call the Secretary, and said, 'I'm really sorry to have to tell you. We don't believe there were any mobile labs for making biological weapons,'" Wilkerson says in the documentary. "This was the third or fourth telephone call. And I think it's fair to say the Secretary and Mr. Tenet, at that point, ceased being close. I mean, you can be sincere and you can be honest and you can believe what you're telling the Secretary. But three or four times on substantive issues like that? It's difficult to maintain any warm feelings."
Colon Powell endorses Barak Obama. nm
.
Bush inherited Powell from Clinton who inherited him from Reagan.
Bush wouldn't have had the sense to pick Powell all by himself. Have you heard the latest on Condi? She's been palling around with senior Hamas leaders, sending them thank you notes and such.
Here's how that other thing works. When the fringers stop lying, dems stop denying. It's not that complicated.
Republican
Are't you the one posting Democrat? Get over it. After all, thank God John Kerry's not in office, we'd all be dead.
Military Wife.
Just an fyi...I am not a Republican. (nm)
nm
Unfortunately, I'm not the other Me, by the way. I'm the republican me.
LOL
He was the only Republican of the 5....
and he and John Glenn were cleared of any wrongdoing.
The Keating Five were five United States Senators accused of corruption in 1989, igniting a major political scandal as part of the larger Savings and Loan crisis of the late 1980s and early 1990s. The five senators, Alan Cranston (D-CA), Dennis DeConcini (D-AZ), John Glenn (D-OH), John McCain (R-AZ), and Donald W. Riegle (D-MI), were accused of improperly aiding Charles H. Keating, Jr., chairman of the failed Lincoln Savings and Loan Association, which was the target of an investigation by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FHLBB).
After a lengthy investigation, the Senate Ethics Committee determined in 1991 that Alan Cranston, Dennis DeConcini, and Donald Riegle had substantially and improperly interfered with the FHLBB in its investigation of Lincoln Savings. Senators John Glenn and John McCain were cleared of having acted improperly but were criticized for having exercised "poor judgment".
All five of the senators involved served out their terms. Only Glenn and McCain ran for re-election, and they were both re-elected.
ANd by the way....I think Obama has the market cornered on bad judgment. lol.
So is all the one-way republican B.S.
Republican too
I am a Republican too, just don't get on politics board very often. I am praying McCain/Palin win for the sake of our country.
Since when has a Republican? (Unless you
.
I'm not republican....I'm just looking out for my
Unfortunately, I've come to realize the real reason for putting Obama in office has nothing to do with their pocketbook, which is all I heard for weeks, but it has to do only with the color of his skin. I've realized there are so many racists such as yourself on this board that care absolutely nothing about their country...only the color of this man's skin.
How sad for you
What does Republican have to do with it?
@@
I'm not republican but......
the only ones being had by Obama are the ones who voted for him........
that would be you, right? So you mean he played his own democratic party into believing he actually cared about the people of this country, isn't that what you meant? Republicans and independents knew he was lying all along. Too bad you didn't!
ROFL!
So tell me what does a republican look like
I'd like to know how you were able to tell the republicans from the democrats and independents. All three parties were at the rallies, and to me they all look like human beings to me. I couldn't tell one from the other. They all had 2 ears, a head, a body, and most of them had arms and legs (except for a few I would imagine). All I know is there were democrats, republicans, and independents there and they were all patriots. It was a day where parties were put aside and people talked about facts, not parties. Everyone who participated did not say it was one side or the others fault. They said it was both sides fault. This was not an anti-Obama rally, it was an anti-government rally. Didn't you read the signs? I guess not.
You think there are no black republicans. Guess you don't follow politics very closely. As for old and white. First, that is a racist comment. Second if you want to see old and white look at your lord's administration. Every time he has a photo op he is surrounded by old white man. No blacks, no hispanics, no nothing except for old white men. Boy, talk about racism.
As for you not seeing any black faces. Yeah, sure you didn't. Why don't you say something that sounds halfway like a truth.
This is complete and utter bu!!sh!t about it being an anti-Obama rally. This pity party poor us your all picking on us routine is so old.
There is no danger to your lord. The danger is the fear and paranoia being spewed by the left. The left wing media is like a person who yells fire in a theater when there is none and then whines when people call him on it.
Yes I have heard there are concentration camps here, but how true it is I don't know. I'd have to do more research on it.
But for Pete's sake, turn off Keith Oberfool, CNN (Communist News Network) and the other spew on BSNBC and watch some real news. There are many many channels to choose from. Listen to both sides. Not just spew from the hate filled and spiteful left.
And this "I saw no black faces in the crowds". Sorry, I don't buy it. By reading your post I'll bet you were not even watching any of it.
|