Well....she may well be the one who cooks Obama's goose...LOL/joke...you started it. (nm)
Posted By: sam on 2008-08-30
In Reply to: Katrina and Gustav - weepaws
nm
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
- Katrina and Gustav - weepaws
- Well....she may well be the one who cooks Obama's goose...LOL/joke...you started it. (nm) - sam
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
Too many cooks
The number of "Czars" Obama is creating is just plain odd.
Let's see drug czar and intelligence czar (okay, I've heard of those before), but now he's created a tech czar, energy czar, climate czar, economy czar, education czar, He's creating another layer of beurocrats between him and cabinet people.
But, with all those czars, it just goes to show you he is President bizarre (bi-czar) 
Sorry you have to deal with so many cooks
nm
Started paying attention to Obama right after
nm
Obama started the race card game all by his
@
It did not start on Obama's watch - it started last administration -
nm
But Obama's plan is a joke! So much waste and
nm
Obama's plan is no joke. It is more like a nightmare
nm
Ever heard of Barack Hussein Obama before he started running?
that argument doesn't play out either! and she's the VP not the president!
Obama didn't wait for his term to legally begin, he started on Nov. 5th.
Goose egg...but I'd be willing to pay just to see
loopholes dry up. The sky is falling gains no traction once again. Just doesn't...what's that word?...ah yes, just doesn't resonate with us Joe Shmoes.
goose/gander
Remember the joy on the right when Nat Enq revealed Edwards' tawdry affair. Well check out this week's news. SP was doing the wild thing with her hubby's biz partner, so hubby shut down the biz. How do you spell paternity test?
What's good for the goose is
OK. So what about the other 6 thugs listed in the link and the others that are not shown there, such as convicted criminal Gordon Liddy, for example? Naturally, you are using obsfuscation and deflection to miss the point. The issue at hand is candidates and their friends and associations. Obama has also refuted, explained in excruciating detail, reviewed, reiterated, and rebuked 'til the cows came home, and most Americans chose to "accept that and respect that", just as you have done. That has not stopped fringe hate-mongers from beating dead horses over and over and over and over again, to no avail, unless their underlying intent is that of propelling fellow former defecting republicans over to the other side in droves and driving McC's poll numbers into a deep plunge. Ergo, McCain's refute and rebuke does not count unless it has been run into the ground, resurrected and exercised repeatedly until it achieves equal standing.
What's good for the goose is good for the gander. As long as folks keep trying to take issue with Obama and his friends and associates, wildly speculate and draw outlandish conclusions, then McC's friends and associates will also remain fair game and as such, the 6 thugs, Gordon Liddy and many others too numerous to list here in such limited space and time require a league of 24/7 defenders to step up and explain themselves. O camp also has the option to make mountains out of mole hills, take it way beyond the outer limits of logic, call him in and turn him into a Mafioso deadbeat for political gain. You will notice that they do not need to do this to advance their agenda and have not taken that road unless egged into it by these repeated O character slurs.
Ya know what, Silly Goose.........sm
You're not such a silly goose after all.
I agree that, as a public forum, we should be allowed to post what we want (within the realms of human decency) without meeting with ridicule and namecalling.
It may be that, come tonight or tomorrow or whenever the results of the SC decision are posted, I will be wiping egg off my face in order to eat a huge plate of crow (smothered with onion gravy, if you please), but I think the matter does need to be investigated and every person posting here has a right...yes, a constitutional right...to post his or her opinion.
Thank you for putting into a cohesive and coherent manner exactly what I had been trying to say earlier but seemed to have failed so miserably.....that this is still America and that we still have a right to our own opinions.
Yup. A great big goose egg.
x
What's good for the goose.....
Yes, PBS is funded and believe it or not, is not allowed to slant their view. Why in the world would Bushies want to slay their funding? Hmmmm?
With Dems it's more like goose-stepping.
nm
What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
rasberries
This all started because you said
*founded on Christian principles*....now I see you've moderated it to *God* Yes, they were *Deists* not Christians as you said in your first post...big difference....not that you will even admit there is a difference.
First of all, GP started this particular
thread, so she is not responding to anybody's attacks in this case. Second, I think it is very mean to attack someone's religious beliefs. Third, GP indicated that George Bush said that God told him to be president. If I remember correctly, George Bush said that God told him to RUN for president. So he did. SP did not say that God doing the right thing would put McCain in the White House, nor did she imply it. She said that she has faith that God will do the right thing and that his will for the country will be done. Imagine, two Christian practicing their faith and treating God as if he actually exists.
Guess what? God told me to call my sister last weekend. Am I delusional too? Or is it only delusional to think God speaks and leads if you are national figure?
That is not how it started...
This has been going on for quite a while on the Politics forum. The rabid right-wing Christians have been forcing their beliefs on all of us for months and months and months. They have quoted scripture and told us that anyone who does not believe as they do is destined to burn in eternal fire. They have no respect for people of other religions. I was born into a Jewish family, and I have never felt animosity towards any Christian until recently. These posters have forever changed my opinion of Christianity and not for the better!
For nm-So have I. Plus 2 others started lately.
Does that give you a hint?
Don't get that started here......... sm
That is rude and totally uncalled for.
Looks like you started it
When you tried to accuse W of having a double digit and O of triple.
The fact of the matter is you don't know what GW's score is or O's for that matter. I've been on several sites pro and con for both sides. I've read that people were trying to pass a lie that GWs was 99 (looks like you want to believe the lie too). However there are many sites that say he scored around 129. They also said that some people want to believe O's is higher, but according to his SAT/LSAT is ranges in the 115-120. However, it also says that he won't release his SAT score. Imagine that....Obama not releasing information? Say it ain't so Joe.
The fact is before you start accusing someone of a low or high IQ score maybe you should research a little more. We get it, by your posts you don't like GW. Don't know many who do (including myself), but I don't lie to make one look bad.
Don't even get me started.
Double standards, contradicting, arrogance, etc. How much money does that jet cost for promotional tours? I thought stimulus passed.
You don't even know who I am, I only started coming here.
x
No, it started with a real
when they couldn't find anything, they dug up the sex scandal. Clinton was investigated for 7 years; can you name a high-level Clinton administartion official indicted? I know Clinton can't practice law; he was also impeached...what's your point?
So if WWWIII is to be started to
we're just supposed to sit down and shut up? Excuse me, but I was raised Catholic and I do not support this at ALL. Bush does NOT have a direct line to God Almighty.
No, not at all...it started on the far left rag...
the dailykos. That is where it broke. And then the rest of the far left picked it up and ran with it.
I was the first to congratulate Obama on his renouncing of the behavior. But even with him saying that, his supporters continue the salvos at Palin's family. Big time Dem pundits on TV still taking shots at her. Blogs still taking shots at her. Posters on this board still taking shots at her. Now you take people who are not committed yet, they see this happening, and you are left with only two conclusions...either Barack was very serious and meant what he said (which I believe) and his followers and pundits and the media are still going to attack regardless; or that he just made that statement to take the political high road while all the time in the background he is saying "sic her." It has to be one of the two...but either way, if his supporters and big Dem pundits continue the attack it reflects badly on his candidacy. I realize that he cannot control what people do...but one would think they would heed what he says (they claim to believe everything he says) and just lay off...but, to each his own.
Let's just get some more rumors started.
x
you are wishing him out before he has even started?
I understand being cautious, but can't you give the guy a chance? I gave Bush a chance even though I didn't vote for him. I'm not happy with how it turned out, but I wasn't wishing him out of office before he even started.
If your son joined after the war started...
I would be interested to know what HE thinks. There is no draft. No need to send your son to die. Again, you and I disagree on whether or not we should be there. I think that it is silly to think that Hussein was not a threat, or at the very least, a future serious threat. I think our biggest mistake was not taking him out and getting this all done the first time.
Judy started it.......
then I just got sucked in. It was like watching the toilet overflow. What can you do?
I know the Californias started
For awhile, I thought I was in California with all the license plates and Hawaiian shirts everywhere. Got tired of all the traffic too.
they became Medquist! I started sm
wit the Detroit office of TL in 1981 and worked for the company until February of 2006. Like you I made big bucks but after the change to the name Medquist and subsequent yearly changes like everyone else I left. At one time I workekd directly for John Donoho out of the Feasterville office and couldn't have been happier. My whole career with them was spent working at home but hiring MTs and supervising in the area that I live in. I miss the way it use to be. I was 50 years old when I left them and I truly remember a time when they valued their employees, gave bonuses, raises and great Christmas gifts. Its too bad MTs starting out now don't have that type of experience. Yes you could write your own ticket even with TL. They would gladly give out a good raise to a person who had great quality and production and was loyal to the company. Very sad to see what they hve done.
Wrong. It may have started that way...
But once again has degenerated to immature name calling and personal attacks.
5 years old? well when do you think the war started?
who hid a fact there were no WMDs? and there WERE you just dont find the mass media reporting on them. ill find that link to if you would like me to if you want to deny there were ever any weapons found, and let me remind you how long did they have before we invaded to move the weapons?
No iraq had nothing to do with 9/11, that was not why we went in now is it? was that said? We are attacking Iraq because they attacked us? NO, because they WOULD HAVE ATTACKED US as soon as they could.
as most everyone in that link agreed...
5 years old? well when do you think the war started?
who hid a fact there were no WMDs? and there WERE you just dont find the mass media reporting on them. ill find that link to if you would like me to if you want to deny there were ever any weapons found, and let me remind you how long did they have before we invaded to move the weapons?
No iraq had nothing to do with 9/11, that was not why we went in now is it? was that said? We are attacking Iraq because they attacked us? NO, because they WOULD HAVE ATTACKED US as soon as they could.
as most everyone in that link agreed...
Just remember that you started this one...LOL..(sm)
First of all, I am a firm believer in evolution. From what we know from archeologists, man started in small groups and gradually formed larger and larger groups, forming communities. We do know that they worked collectively for the benefit of the community, some hunting, some preparing meals, etc. So, I think there is a large element in society that says we choose what is "right" for the sake of the good/success/survival of the community.
I know that most will say the Bible, and I think the Bible did play a role, but not the only role. This is evidenced by the fact that all cultures have gone through this evolution of determining what is right and wrong. Consider the tribe in the middle of nowhere (and yeah there are still a few) that has had no contact with ANY religion. Scientists have studied cases like this before and have found that even they have a set of "rules" that they go by, and these rules were based on what would or would not benefit their community.
I think the most important thing though is that the rules of right and wrong are constantly changing as we evolve. If you asked your standard white christian lady in the 1800s if it was okay to beat the slave out back, the answer would have most likely been yes. Ask the same question today of anyone and the answer should be no.
So, I think evolution and probably instinct for self preservation are the key factors.
You are such a joke, gt. sm
You think there is only one patriot here? Get a trip on your sour shrivled heart and try not to speak.
what a joke
You truly are a JOKE, LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL..a joke. I live in reality and deal with reality..you, however, through YOUR posts have proven you are nothing but a joke.bye bye neocon..
LOL..JOKE!
Joke
MUJIBAR
Mujibar was trying to get a job in India.
The Personnel Manager said, Mujibar, you have passed all the tests,
Except one. Unless you pass it you cannot qualify for this job.
Mujibar said, I am ready.
The manager said, Make a sentence using the words Yellow, Pink and Green.
Mujibar thought for a few minutes and said, Mister manager, I am ready.
The manager said, Go ahead.
Mujibar said, The telephone goes green, green, green, and I pink it up, and say, 'Yellow, this is Mujibar.'
Mujibar now works as a technician at a call center for computer problems.
No doubt you have spoken to him.
Actually the joke is on us all...sm
First, yes there are terrorist. They attacked us on 9-11. The joke started with the trumped up war against Iraq. That mind you went from a war because of WMD, then a war to rid the world of a brutal dictator, then Operation Iraqi freedom, and now finally operation quagmire.
Ask yourself a couple questions ever so often and see if you still can laugh. *Did Al Quaeda reside in Iraq BEFORE the war????* Or even *Was Iraq a hot bed for terrorist BEFORE the war????*
The issue of the port protection is a different story. I think it would be in America's best interest to develop a US based security company or team. We should not be depending on *outsourced* protection. That's downright sloppy to me. I wouldn't care what country it was.
Is that a joke?
Because it sounds like the answer to the war on terror to me. 
Okay, now for a joke.
Rush *Limp*baugh blames liberals because Americans are fat. Huh?....talk about intellectually confused. http://mediamatters.org/items/20060829013
joke joke joke
Obama is chocolate, biden is vanilla. It never works when you have to explain your jokes. Mea culpa.
Oh come on - it's a joke! Do you truly believe everything
???
some joke-
NOT. What an awful thing to say, that that death would be a joke to anyone. Rights - what about responsibilities, like the responsibility to use some form of contraception other than abortion? I know you will come back with the rape, incest, endangered health of mother, and those are valid. But reality is that a large percentage of abortions are not performed for those reasons but for the "convenience" of the mother. And being that irresponsible is not a "right."
Because she's a joke.
What a joke........
May I suggest you go to their country and see how peaceful they live with you? So many try to defend something they haven't bother to study.
The holiest book of Islam draws the sharpest of distinctions between Muslims and non-Muslims, lavishing praise on the former while condemning the latter. Far from teaching universal love, the Qur'an incessantly preaches the inferiority of non-Muslims, even comparing them to vile animals and gloating over Allah's hatred of them and his dark plans for their eternal torture. Naturally, the harsh treatment of non-believers by Muslims is encouraged as well.
Does that sound like a loving tolerant people to you?
This has got to be a JOKE!!!
Of all the nerve!! I think this person needs to be banned from this site, as obviously this person is not in the MT field and just spreading a bunch of garbage to rile people up.
|
